Not to be rude or anything, but it is a very good idea to look through the site for a specific airplane via the search function under the airplanes tab before asking someone to build it. There are a couple good looking X-36’s you might want to take a look at.
This is pretty easy to achieve. First make sure that the first cannon to fire have the salvo delay that you want, then put the firing delay on all the rest of them to 0 seconds. You will have to do that part through XML editing. Also, there is an issue where the cannons with 0 second delay will have no cannon recoil visual; it will exhibit the recoil force, just the barrel will not roll-back like it should.
Even though this is my first time dealing with ships, I easily found out the problem. The forward bottom edge of turret No.2 strikes the rear of turret No.1 and the rotator continues to try and move, thus flipping the boat over. Overall, it is a wonderful design that certainly deserves some attention. Side note: I recommend making the boat a tad bit wider.
Edit: to solve the problem of it sliding while turning, you need a vertical stabilizer running diagonally down and out and running the entire length of the ship’s middle section. All warships have this to create a “pivot point” for the ship and to also prevent water flowing diagonally across the ships hull in a turn.
Ok I managed to get a fragment: "Ilyushin worked on the deck version of his Il-40 attack aircraft (which, incidentally, was only in sketches by the end of 1950), which received the designation Il-58. In addition to deck attributes, the aircraft had a glazed cockpit of the navigator and scorer and a reduced reservation." It was the competitor of Tu-91 "Boot" (existed in reality), and projects Yak-25PK, Grigorovich DG-68, and Tupolev Project 509 as part of a carrier-based aircraft competition. All of them are listed in the article.
Also, from Secret Projects Forum: "IL-58 carrier-based attack aircraft project proposed in the initiative order Ilyushin Design Bureau in 1952" and, "As for Il-58, after Stalin's death and her subsequent revision of military doctrine, the interest of the customer to the construction of aircraft carriers, and with them, and planes for their weapons, long disappeared in the Soviet Union."
@Mustang51
Cool! Although I am working on creating the Sukhoi I-2M-107 with over 140 parts, and the bomber destroyer version of the Ilyushin Il-14 fitted with the extremely powerful 100mm V-0902 cannon as my gold build. @Winstonlharambe
It's because of the hydraulic system. It did that on all world fighters up until the mid 1950's when they brought in more powerful hydraulics, except for the WW2 Polikarpov I-16 fighter which had a hand-cranked wire retraction system. What it does is 65% or more hydraulic power is spent on one gear leg to crank it up, while just enough is used to bring up the other. When the first one completes the process, all hydraulic power is shift over to the second one which makes it go faster until it finishes too. @xXRaindropXx
iExplorer indicates that the app developer needs to enable Document support in the app before it can drill down to SimplePlanes -> Documents.
At present, I can't see any files under the SimplePlanes app. If you were to enable the Documents, then iTunes would allow transfer of documents from its interface. No need for iExplorer.
A long time has past since you posted that comment lol. Interests change and that's what really happened way back 2 years ago. I'm just checking in and tending to a little nostalgia at the moment. I got burnt out completely trying to make accurate replicas that also had a realistic fight model back in 2020 during my height. But I got really discouraged when I found out I pretty much needed to manipulate it using the then-new Funky Trees; ever since then I struggled to fully use it. It frustrated me very much how I needed to go to extreme lengths to get my projects to perform what they possibly would have flown like. The last project I was working on was a remake of the Alekseyev I-216 heavy interceptor with two 76mm NS-76 cannons. Got the fuselage and front guns done and had just the canopy, wings, and landing gear left. I also had massive ambitions to create the sister project of my M-31, the Myasishchev M-32 with a single massive FAB-9000 bomb. I really wanted to fly and work on military prototypes like I was doing here as a real world career. However, I realized that it would most likely be out of the question and I would have to be a civilian pilot instead which has never interested me. I've gone full circle and have ended up back in the same interests I had as a younger kid which happens to be semi trucks and especially farming. There has been a couple times where I've mustered up some confidence to try and pick the game up, but they've been shot down as all my procedures and understanding of the building techniques are 2 years old. It would take a very long time to try and understand something I'm not 100% gung-ho about. I suppose I should try to not forcefully resurrect a past hobby, so I'll probably let this one quietly die out and reflect on the great memories I had and created. @WinsWings
I hope you realize that this airplane is strikingly similar to the Ilyushin TsKB-60; the first one to receive the designation IL-6. I almost wonder if you took inspiration from it!
Nice work! Although I wish you had read further on this aircraft. “302” was the original number for the aircraft with PVRDs under the wings. The “302P” was a further development with no PVRDs after much argument in OKB-55 about including them in the final prototype. Overall, it is a fantastic build and I like it greatly.
Not to be rude or anything, but it is a very good idea to look through the site for a specific airplane via the search function under the airplanes tab before asking someone to build it. There are a couple good looking X-36’s you might want to take a look at.
+2This is pretty easy to achieve. First make sure that the first cannon to fire have the salvo delay that you want, then put the firing delay on all the rest of them to 0 seconds. You will have to do that part through XML editing. Also, there is an issue where the cannons with 0 second delay will have no cannon recoil visual; it will exhibit the recoil force, just the barrel will not roll-back like it should.
+2I thought it was my dad’s firewall giving me trouble.
+2This is pretty good. I like it.
+2FINALLY!! Someone made an R-23/R-24!
+2Hello. I do mainly fighters and attack aircraft, although every now and then I will crank out a bomber because they are not my specialty.
+2I LOVE THE ZONDA
+2Thank you!
+2@Tums
@KerlonceauxIndustries
Why didn’t I upvote this!??! I swear I upvoted it a long time ago!!
+2Drink Vodka Give Hugs
+2Even though this is my first time dealing with ships, I easily found out the problem. The forward bottom edge of turret No.2 strikes the rear of turret No.1 and the rotator continues to try and move, thus flipping the boat over. Overall, it is a wonderful design that certainly deserves some attention.
Side note: I recommend making the boat a tad bit wider.
Edit: to solve the problem of it sliding while turning, you need a vertical stabilizer running diagonally down and out and running the entire length of the ship’s middle section. All warships have this to create a “pivot point” for the ship and to also prevent water flowing diagonally across the ships hull in a turn.
+2FINALLY A GOOD REPLICA!
+2Girthy Melons
+2Amazing job! This is so cool!
+2Ok I managed to get a fragment: "Ilyushin worked on the deck version of his Il-40 attack aircraft (which, incidentally, was only in sketches by the end of 1950), which received the designation Il-58. In addition to deck attributes, the aircraft had a glazed cockpit of the navigator and scorer and a reduced reservation." It was the competitor of Tu-91 "Boot" (existed in reality), and projects Yak-25PK, Grigorovich DG-68, and Tupolev Project 509 as part of a carrier-based aircraft competition. All of them are listed in the article.
Also, from Secret Projects Forum: "IL-58 carrier-based attack aircraft project proposed in the initiative order Ilyushin Design Bureau in 1952" and, "As for Il-58, after Stalin's death and her subsequent revision of military doctrine, the interest of the customer to the construction of aircraft carriers, and with them, and planes for their weapons, long disappeared in the Soviet Union."
+2@Mustang51
Thanks for the upvotes!
+2@Thelegitpilot13
@randomusername
@FranzPeterSiegfried
Your welcome! After all, you did play a big part in this in my opinion. @Brendorkus
+2Thank you! @Sgtk
@Aarons123
Impossible. It is based totally around the mod. There would be no tracks if it was mod less. @ayaya
+2‘eh cun ah get sum spageteh wis dem meetbuls mon?
+2Ahh yes, the vodka shot glass launcher as I like to call it. Second only to the vodka bottle launcher known as the Yak-9K.
+2#Satisfying
+2One of my favorite British bombers!!
+2You have a ridiculously awesome imagination!
+2Ahh page 7..........the perfect number.......
+2Your silver.......
Am I seeing this right?!?!!!
+2The nose look somewhat similar to what you would find on a Soviet Shturmovik (ground attacker) to let the pilot see the ground easily. Excellent job!
+2This thing is pretty good for a beginner!
+2Cool! Although I am working on creating the Sukhoi I-2M-107 with over 140 parts, and the bomber destroyer version of the Ilyushin Il-14 fitted with the extremely powerful 100mm V-0902 cannon as my gold build. @Winstonlharambe
+2What the blin (crépe)?!!?! 0_o
+2This is crazy good.
+2It's because of the hydraulic system. It did that on all world fighters up until the mid 1950's when they brought in more powerful hydraulics, except for the WW2 Polikarpov I-16 fighter which had a hand-cranked wire retraction system. What it does is 65% or more hydraulic power is spent on one gear leg to crank it up, while just enough is used to bring up the other. When the first one completes the process, all hydraulic power is shift over to the second one which makes it go faster until it finishes too. @xXRaindropXx
+2Very true. They’re unique to the country. @CarsonG1017
+2Oh thanks. That probably would help. @jamesPLANESii
+2Lol!! @jamesPLANESii
+2Thank you for your upvotes! @randomusername @CarsonG1017
+2Hah! Just imagine if President Trump had a 3D printed model of this in the White House!!!
+2@F104Deathtrap Thanks for your upvote.
+2I love it. Another one for my Cold War collection.
+2iExplorer indicates that the app developer needs to enable Document support in the app before it can drill down to SimplePlanes -> Documents.
At present, I can't see any files under the SimplePlanes app. If you were to enable the Documents, then iTunes would allow transfer of documents from its interface. No need for iExplorer.
+2A long time has past since you posted that comment lol. Interests change and that's what really happened way back 2 years ago. I'm just checking in and tending to a little nostalgia at the moment. I got burnt out completely trying to make accurate replicas that also had a realistic fight model back in 2020 during my height. But I got really discouraged when I found out I pretty much needed to manipulate it using the then-new Funky Trees; ever since then I struggled to fully use it. It frustrated me very much how I needed to go to extreme lengths to get my projects to perform what they possibly would have flown like. The last project I was working on was a remake of the Alekseyev I-216 heavy interceptor with two 76mm NS-76 cannons. Got the fuselage and front guns done and had just the canopy, wings, and landing gear left. I also had massive ambitions to create the sister project of my M-31, the Myasishchev M-32 with a single massive FAB-9000 bomb. I really wanted to fly and work on military prototypes like I was doing here as a real world career. However, I realized that it would most likely be out of the question and I would have to be a civilian pilot instead which has never interested me. I've gone full circle and have ended up back in the same interests I had as a younger kid which happens to be semi trucks and especially farming. There has been a couple times where I've mustered up some confidence to try and pick the game up, but they've been shot down as all my procedures and understanding of the building techniques are 2 years old. It would take a very long time to try and understand something I'm not 100% gung-ho about. I suppose I should try to not forcefully resurrect a past hobby, so I'll probably let this one quietly die out and reflect on the great memories I had and created. @WinsWings
+1I hope you realize that this airplane is strikingly similar to the Ilyushin TsKB-60; the first one to receive the designation IL-6. I almost wonder if you took inspiration from it!
+1Hands down, cutest anime I’ve ever watched
+1T
+1It’s a naval strike fighter. Could be fitted with bombs or rockets, but was seen most with a torpedo.
+1@TheTwoanie2000
Ok thanks. I’ll participate!
+1@WiiMini
They also added two engines in the MiG-19 making it definitively supersonic.
+1@BagelPlane
Just so you know, the “C” in Russian translates to “S” in English.
+1Aym phast boi
+1To what? Making him leave?
+1@shipster
Nice work! Although I wish you had read further on this aircraft. “302” was the original number for the aircraft with PVRDs under the wings. The “302P” was a further development with no PVRDs after much argument in OKB-55 about including them in the final prototype. Overall, it is a fantastic build and I like it greatly.
+1