@Smoothray oh wow, you actually did it, most users I see usually start arguing that it's theirs, when they know perfectly well it isn't, but you actually did the right thing and credited REW in the description, thanks!
I like this, it's definitely a sign that teachers are realizing the actual benefits that some games have, instead of immediately resorting to saying that it'll make your brain rot. Although I wouldn't exactly use SimplePlanes as a physics demonstration, considering that there are times when if something lands in water, it'll immediately accelerate to around Mach 3 and end up flying into the stratosphere. Also, due to the hitbox of parts, the cockpit block can stand perfectly upright on it's topside, without falling over. Lol
Jesus Christ, if something like this was ever made irl, you could literally create a weaponized floating city, you could have a large portion of the carrier deck for the city itself, most of the deck for navy related things since it's an aircraft carrier, the interior of the carrier could literally store and deploy other smaller carriers, and even a fleet of destroyers, heck, you could even use it for more city space too if there's enough room, and based on this thing's size, it'd be possible to dispatch an entire Air Force from this thing to scout out the surrounding area, and destroy any possible threats. What? You think just because it's an absolutely massive target will make it easier to sink? Nonsense. Something of this size could probably withstand a small nuke going off inside of it, and the carrier would be fine.
Ahh yes, a carrier like this irl would truly be unsinkable.
@Mobius1Cyka dang, how does somebody hate a Russian tank destroyer with a top speed of around 40km/h, a gun that can do around 400-700 damage per shot, and that has the good ol' cheeki breeki soviet power?
@TyDillon13GEICO nope, he allowed it; I used an XML Modded gun to give the main guns a bullet shell ejection effect, so it would look cooler and score higher on the looks factor of the challenge.
@CRJ900Pilot same, in fact I was literally just reading your comments a little bit ago, and happened to notice your little argument between BogDanX about his U-2 Dragon Lady, and how you were just trying to help him, but he went off on a tangent about how you "don't know a single thing about the U-2".
I've also tried conversing with him too; someone made an absolutely outstanding Spitfire that had well over 1,000 parts, multiple functional gauges and meters in the cockpit, as well as beautiful decals and details, basically everything you'd want in a Spitfire! Link to Plane But of course, BogDanX typed out a whole two paragraphs of design flaws, imperfections, and basically anything he could find that wasn't "perfect". I replied to his comment saying that he should understand that the creation took an extremely long time to create, and he should appreciate all the hard work that was put into it, rather than pointing out every single "mistake and imperfection" in the entire build. But alas, he went off on a tangent about why he lists all the flaws, and how it's supposed to motivate the user to do better next time, and I replied saying that not everyone has the same incredible standards as you do, so don't go off saying that something is flawed and that it should be corrected, when they weren't trying to be absolutely perfect, but instead they just wanted to make a highly detailed Spitfire, that didn't need to be perfect, according to their standards. And then BogDanX went and did the only right and correct thing to do, which was block me from communicating with him. Congratulations, you now have one less person supporting your amazing creations. But yeah, long story short, I definitely agree with you, and that his standards are waaay too high sometimes.
@CRJ900Pilot
@SubXTribe
@Aeromen
BogDanX deletes his posts even if they have 100+ upvotes because they're aren't good enough compared to his standards, I kinda wish he didn't delete his posts, because then we'd still be able to play around and have fun with them. Ehh, whatever, to each his own.
I conducted multiple tests on its ability to survive certain situations, and here are the results: Horizontal Crash - When you crash into a flat surface horizontally, for instance, a mountain, it seems that most of the general structure survives, while one of the wings will break off and explode, or the entire thing will explode, depending on where you crash. Vertical Crash (Dive-Bomb) - Same thing as the horizontal crash, not much else happens. Wing Clip - If you strike your wing on the tip of a mountain, it seems to hold up perfectly fine, with minimal damage, and if you're lucky, you can even stay flying too! Fighter Aircraft - I spawned in some AI Fighters to shoot me down, and it seems that this thing's biggest weakness is being shot at, as it will easily get destroyed, due to how once enough parts are destroyed, the structure of the aircraft will eventually just fall apart, since there is nothing left holding it together. Missiles - I provoked the destroyers at the USS Beast to shoot some AA Missiles at me, and surprisingly, the missiles didn't obliterate the entire thing, but instead they just knocked out a big chunk of the aircraft's fuselage. Obviously, this still sent it crashing into the ocean, but it still held up quite nicely after a missile impact. Flak Cannons - It was easily able to survive one shot from a Flak Cannon, but all it took was another shot to finish it off, since the first Flak Shot was able to highly damage the majority of the fuselage, and then the next one easily blew it apart, due to the sudden weakness in the aircraft's structure.
Hopefully, this was enough to judge the endurance of this aircraft, thank you for your time reading this.
They look almost exactly alike, I literally couldn't tell the difference between the top picture and the bottom picture, you are seriously the best passenger jet creator in SimplePlanes!
@EchoWhiskey11 Thanks, I'm trying to keep it at as low of a part count as I can, while keeping important details and deadly characteristics at their highest!
@EchoWhiskey11 thanks for answering, I wanted to have an exhaust effect for my engines, and I have a Modded mini gun that gives the guns a bullet-shell ejection effect, so I just wanted to clarify if that was allowed. Thanks!
March 17th, 2019, An Anti-Vaxx mother and her son are in a room, the mother trying her best to care for her child.
"Here son, have some essential oils, those should get rid of your Measles in a jiffy!"
"I dunno mom, I'm not sure if these are cough working, it seems to be cough getting worse."
"Don't worry, it'll get better! The only thing you need to worry about is what you want for your 3rd birthday next week!" Three Days Later
"Mom, I don't feel cough so good, are you sure I'm cough cough ok?"
"Strange, I gave you essential oils, why isn't it working?" The innocent child proceeds to start wheezing and coughing, and then dies a few minutes later, right in front of his mother.
"Oh no! What have I done?!" All of a sudden, a hoard of Oompa Loompas enter the room.
OOMPA LOOMPA DOOPITY DOO, WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU? OOMPA LOOMPA DOOPITY DEE, YOUR CHILD HAS DIED BEFORE HE TURNED THREE.
It's called the "Thud" because that's the sound a convoy truck makes when it hits the ground after being launched a few kilometers into the air after being obliterated by six 500lb bombs at once. Or you know, something like that.
Three questions:
- Can I use extra things like jet engines that produce no thrust, and extra guns for things like bullet ejection effects, for purely aesthetic purposes?
- Is landing gear necessary, or will the aircraft(s) be spawned in the air?
- Are Infinite Fuel-Blocks allowed?
@MIDNIGHT aww, thanks! I just really like dragons, so that's the main reason why I support your account, since you seem to make nothing but dragons, which is awesome!
Also, by any chance do you read "Wings of Fire"?
This is just too cool, like as long as this doesn't just break physics to fly, and it actually flys using the mechanism it has, this could seriously be used irl, and I think that's amazing!
This thing is great, you weren't "Lyon" when you said that it's speed has been increased!
Sorry.
+1@Smoothray oh wow, you actually did it, most users I see usually start arguing that it's theirs, when they know perfectly well it isn't, but you actually did the right thing and credited REW in the description, thanks!
@Notaleopard you already used SimplePlanes in school?! No wonder you're such a good user!
This was copied from REW's post, either credit him in the description, or delete the post.
C'mon, you're better than that. We all know you can post better than this. Now go, create something, and impress us!
@Awsomur it's supposed to look like Tai-Lung from "Kung-Fu Panda" since this guy fsr really likes Kung fu panda.
I like this, it's definitely a sign that teachers are realizing the actual benefits that some games have, instead of immediately resorting to saying that it'll make your brain rot. Although I wouldn't exactly use SimplePlanes as a physics demonstration, considering that there are times when if something lands in water, it'll immediately accelerate to around Mach 3 and end up flying into the stratosphere. Also, due to the hitbox of parts, the cockpit block can stand perfectly upright on it's topside, without falling over. Lol
+6@BuiltBionixInd10 well, that's kinda what a fire tornado does, so you're not wrong...
I love how it says OWO on one of the smokestacks
+2Very creative, now you gotta make a working Frag. Grenade that has actual separating fragments!
@Destroyerz117 does it have a cold? Don't worry, I'll go get the vaccinations!
+1@Mobius1Cyka Чики Брики Товарищ!
Jesus Christ, if something like this was ever made irl, you could literally create a weaponized floating city, you could have a large portion of the carrier deck for the city itself, most of the deck for navy related things since it's an aircraft carrier, the interior of the carrier could literally store and deploy other smaller carriers, and even a fleet of destroyers, heck, you could even use it for more city space too if there's enough room, and based on this thing's size, it'd be possible to dispatch an entire Air Force from this thing to scout out the surrounding area, and destroy any possible threats. What? You think just because it's an absolutely massive target will make it easier to sink? Nonsense. Something of this size could probably withstand a small nuke going off inside of it, and the carrier would be fine.
Ahh yes, a carrier like this irl would truly be unsinkable.
+4@Mobius1Cyka dang, how does somebody hate a Russian tank destroyer with a top speed of around 40km/h, a gun that can do around 400-700 damage per shot, and that has the good ol' cheeki breeki soviet power?
+1@ChiyomiAnzai SimpleRockets 2 players.
Congratulations
The SU-100Y is one of my most favorite Russian Tank-Destroyers, especially in WoT.
+2@Destroyerz117 thanks!
@TyDillon13GEICO nope, he allowed it; I used an XML Modded gun to give the main guns a bullet shell ejection effect, so it would look cooler and score higher on the looks factor of the challenge.
+1Anyone else notice how good this thing is at doing wheelies?
@DankDorito oh yeah definitely
Alright, that's enough SimplePlanes for one day...
+1@CRJ900Pilot same, in fact I was literally just reading your comments a little bit ago, and happened to notice your little argument between BogDanX about his U-2 Dragon Lady, and how you were just trying to help him, but he went off on a tangent about how you "don't know a single thing about the U-2".
I've also tried conversing with him too; someone made an absolutely outstanding Spitfire that had well over 1,000 parts, multiple functional gauges and meters in the cockpit, as well as beautiful decals and details, basically everything you'd want in a Spitfire! Link to Plane But of course, BogDanX typed out a whole two paragraphs of design flaws, imperfections, and basically anything he could find that wasn't "perfect". I replied to his comment saying that he should understand that the creation took an extremely long time to create, and he should appreciate all the hard work that was put into it, rather than pointing out every single "mistake and imperfection" in the entire build. But alas, he went off on a tangent about why he lists all the flaws, and how it's supposed to motivate the user to do better next time, and I replied saying that not everyone has the same incredible standards as you do, so don't go off saying that something is flawed and that it should be corrected, when they weren't trying to be absolutely perfect, but instead they just wanted to make a highly detailed Spitfire, that didn't need to be perfect, according to their standards. And then BogDanX went and did the only right and correct thing to do, which was block me from communicating with him. Congratulations, you now have one less person supporting your amazing creations. But yeah, long story short, I definitely agree with you, and that his standards are waaay too high sometimes.
@CRJ900Pilot
@SubXTribe
@Aeromen
BogDanX deletes his posts even if they have 100+ upvotes because they're aren't good enough compared to his standards, I kinda wish he didn't delete his posts, because then we'd still be able to play around and have fun with them. Ehh, whatever, to each his own.
That's a goat if I ever saw one...
+1I conducted multiple tests on its ability to survive certain situations, and here are the results:
Horizontal Crash - When you crash into a flat surface horizontally, for instance, a mountain, it seems that most of the general structure survives, while one of the wings will break off and explode, or the entire thing will explode, depending on where you crash.
Vertical Crash (Dive-Bomb) - Same thing as the horizontal crash, not much else happens.
Wing Clip - If you strike your wing on the tip of a mountain, it seems to hold up perfectly fine, with minimal damage, and if you're lucky, you can even stay flying too!
Fighter Aircraft - I spawned in some AI Fighters to shoot me down, and it seems that this thing's biggest weakness is being shot at, as it will easily get destroyed, due to how once enough parts are destroyed, the structure of the aircraft will eventually just fall apart, since there is nothing left holding it together.
Missiles - I provoked the destroyers at the USS Beast to shoot some AA Missiles at me, and surprisingly, the missiles didn't obliterate the entire thing, but instead they just knocked out a big chunk of the aircraft's fuselage. Obviously, this still sent it crashing into the ocean, but it still held up quite nicely after a missile impact.
Flak Cannons - It was easily able to survive one shot from a Flak Cannon, but all it took was another shot to finish it off, since the first Flak Shot was able to highly damage the majority of the fuselage, and then the next one easily blew it apart, due to the sudden weakness in the aircraft's structure.
Hopefully, this was enough to judge the endurance of this aircraft, thank you for your time reading this.
+1@QingyuZhou This looks amazing, and those Chinese Characters are on point!
Damn, this is amazing!
Pretty cool, I like how it's spinner is square shaped, very unique compared to other entries.
@BlackhattAircraft you're welcome! Sorry forgot to upvote, lol
They look almost exactly alike, I literally couldn't tell the difference between the top picture and the bottom picture, you are seriously the best passenger jet creator in SimplePlanes!
+2Hans, get ze Gustav!
@EchoWhiskey11 Thanks, I'm trying to keep it at as low of a part count as I can, while keeping important details and deadly characteristics at their highest!
@EchoWhiskey11 thanks for answering, I wanted to have an exhaust effect for my engines, and I have a Modded mini gun that gives the guns a bullet-shell ejection effect, so I just wanted to clarify if that was allowed. Thanks!
+1@EchoWhiskey11 Can you plz answer my questions about your challenge that you made? (The latest one)
Also nice plane! @BlackhattAircraft
March 17th, 2019, An Anti-Vaxx mother and her son are in a room, the mother trying her best to care for her child.
"Here son, have some essential oils, those should get rid of your Measles in a jiffy!"
"I dunno mom, I'm not sure if these are cough working, it seems to be cough getting worse."
"Don't worry, it'll get better! The only thing you need to worry about is what you want for your 3rd birthday next week!"
Three Days Later
"Mom, I don't feel cough so good, are you sure I'm cough cough ok?"
"Strange, I gave you essential oils, why isn't it working?"
The innocent child proceeds to start wheezing and coughing, and then dies a few minutes later, right in front of his mother.
"Oh no! What have I done?!"
All of a sudden, a hoard of Oompa Loompas enter the room.
OOMPA LOOMPA DOOPITY DOO, WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU? OOMPA LOOMPA DOOPITY DEE, YOUR CHILD HAS DIED BEFORE HE TURNED THREE.
+1It's called the "Thud" because that's the sound a convoy truck makes when it hits the ground after being launched a few kilometers into the air after being obliterated by six 500lb bombs at once. Or you know, something like that.
+3Pretty cool!
@EchoWhiskey11
@EchoWhiskey11
@EchoWhiskey11
Refer to previous comment
Three questions:
- Can I use extra things like jet engines that produce no thrust, and extra guns for things like bullet ejection effects, for purely aesthetic purposes?
- Is landing gear necessary, or will the aircraft(s) be spawned in the air?
- Are Infinite Fuel-Blocks allowed?
@BionicDragonYT don't say that just yet, there may still be some people who will enter. When's the deadline?
Spy Snorting Noises
Me: Look at this aircraft carrier called the "Sigma-Class CDV Trinity"
My Friend: What's Sigma
Me: Sigma Balls! ECKS-DEEEEEEEEEE
@MIDNIGHT aww, thanks! I just really like dragons, so that's the main reason why I support your account, since you seem to make nothing but dragons, which is awesome!
Also, by any chance do you read "Wings of Fire"?
Awesome, you are just amazing at creating dragons in this game!
@BionicDragonYT thanks, I'll comment the link here.
@CrashFighter05 you're welcome. :)
@Mobius1Cyka Happy Easter and happy flying!
Can I enter the egg I posted a little bit ago?
This is just too cool, like as long as this doesn't just break physics to fly, and it actually flys using the mechanism it has, this could seriously be used irl, and I think that's amazing!