Profile image

Lockheed C-5B Galaxy

45.3k MonikaAkiyama  2.8 years ago
34,779 downloads

Its Finished, the gears are real packed with Funky Trees Coding, The Main Landing Gear rotator Coding is by @spefyjerbf on @AN2Felllla post here

Controls:

AG2 = Wing & Main Gear lights
AG3 = Rev thrust
Steering = Roll
Landing Speed = 150 To 180

Update
BigBoie Livery

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +7 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 173.1ft (52.7m)
  • Length 192.2ft (58.6m)
  • Height 52.6ft (16.0m)
  • Empty Weight 196,445lbs (89,106kg)
  • Loaded Weight 239,496lbs (108,634kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.182
  • Wing Loading 55.6lbs/ft2 (271.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 4,307.3ft2 (400.2m2)
  • Drag Points 17366

Parts

  • Number of Parts 408
  • Control Surfaces 18
  • Performance Cost 2,321
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @HololiveFan ik this is very late but the c5 isn’t retired. They use the aircraft quite a bit.

    1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Has a very fatal stopping issue.

    1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.8k ChiChiWerx

    A tip that speaks to KLM’s point concerning the RL gross weight of the aircraft, SP includes the area of the vertical and horizontal stabilizers, so your number in the designer will not reflect the true “wing area”, as understood in real life. The workaround is to look up the RL wing area (Wiki lists the C-5 wing area as 6,200 sq ft), add the wings and size them to 6,200 sq ft. Once that’s sorted, then add the vertical and horizontal stabs; this way your build will more closely reflect the RL lifting capability. As for the jittery landing gear, yes, SP is very annoying, there are workarounds, but tweaking masses and lowering forward reaction does minimize these issues.

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.8k ChiChiWerx

    @DJRianGamer004 where did you get that idea? We have 56 C-5Ms currently in the inventory, upgraded with new engines (GE F138 / CF6, same as the 747) and avionics.

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.8k ChiChiWerx

    This is really good, the flight model is excellent. It is certainly underweight and overpowered, but it feels like flying a big jet. The build is complete without being needlessly complex.

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MARKY3090 and its ptfs yall

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    lets all play pilot training flight simulator on roblox.

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @McDonnellDouglas no need to be so mean jees :/

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @McDonnellDouglas :(

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    464 IcyNylon

    @DJRianGamer004 no one cares abt your roblox account

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chillybaconface Fact: all the C-5 planes are retiered

    +2 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Cool I like it

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    You know the rules, and so do I.
    Time to shoot it down and make cool epic crash

    +1 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chillybaconface friend me in roblox my account username is DJRianGamer and my display name is Rian

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chillybaconface ok

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @DJRianGamer004 not but ill try to make it mobile capable

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Is it okay when i use low physics?

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    19.0k klm747klm747

    @Chillybaconface Okay, well good job overall.

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @klm747klm747 i just made the plane decent enough to fly nicely thats the reason why i dont put alot of weight, i tried my best to keep the landing from shaking or exploding because of the additional rotator & spring by attaching the top part of the landing gear into a separate hinge & connect the spring directly into its hinge & yes i agree that the brakes are weak i just noticed it when i fly it more & more

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    19.0k klm747klm747

    Good to see you included the TF-39s.

    Whoa this thing needs a lot of work, it feels like it has no brakes, 0.6 is not enough brake torque for a 230,000 pound airplane, even with this amount of wheels. Performance specifications say the airplane should be able to land and stop in 4,900 feet at 840,000 pounds

    I loaded it up to its true maximum takeoff weight and the airplane could not fly, as well as the landing gear being super buggy.

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mikey101234 its just the wing scale which affects the COL

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,867 Mikey101234

    How does this get on front page when the wings don’t have ailerons. I can’t tell you. Hint: look at the COL

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.1k Sparky6004

    I’ve been waiting for a C-5B like this! This is great! I’m gonna rig up my light modules for it that I’ve gathered and coded. Loving it already

    +1 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    38.6k Trainzo

    Very nice Galaxy . Great build .

    +1 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.2k SilverStar

    Oooh I can’t wait to test it !

    +1 2.8 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments