@Gx
Comes to think about it, I have no idea lol.
For my F-22, I still had engine activated even throttle is 0 (AG1 activated only) because my plane is heavy, thrust spike won't do much in term of speed.

@GuyFolk That's something that already takes place, when we input AngleOfSlip it will correct in both directions, again, you'd have to input extra code to make it so that one engine doesn't slow down and the engine speeds up to correct only reacts. So yes, that works but that will present a new issue... now when the throttle is being fully cut then what? and I assume that happens a lot while trying to slow down for landing.
So ultimately there needs to be some condition that accounts for the lowering of speed. It's either lower the speed using the power of that speed value or make certian conditions like GS < x ? AngleOfSlip/y ; AngleOfSlip/z

@Gx
That might work.
But I have an alternative, when increasing thrust to one side, just lower the thrust of the other by the same amount, that way net thrust stay the same but distributed differently.
And how to make in equal?
idk
But I assume thrust is in linear relationship with throttle so lower the same % of throttle as you increasing it to the other side.

@ZoaMiki @GuyFolk How about making it dependent on speed then? Something like this? : pow(GS(clamp(AngleOfSlip/x, y,z))) and also shit, I forgot I can't use your real name anywhere else, sorry.

@Gx But what if I'm trying to land and the engines try to correct for the angle of slip? also don't use my real name! ヽ(ಠ_ಠ)ノ

@Gx
I guess my brain went kaput back then, got it mixed up with nozzle redirection lol.
And I found that (after a quick test with my basic differential thrust plane) when landing with differential thrust, the plane will slip and cause differential thrust to add more speed to the plane but it'll depend on the plane if the added speed will affect landing.

@GuyFolk You can also just keep the TVC independent on the power though, hell that is how it works normally... You'd have to actually write extra code just to make it so that the Tvc has to depend on. I think you're referring to nozzle redirection where your point will stand, but ZoaMiki used engine thrust directly to change yaw, so that point of low engine power is obsolete because in this case, I can yaw regardless of engine power, but the angle of slip advice is good. This thing likes to slip around A LOT and having to manually correct AoS in such an advanced fighter is a downside

@GuyFolk oki :-)

@ZoaMiki
Use both control surface and differential thrust, I'd say but if you can only have one, go with control surface.
Control surface is useless at low speed and tvc is useless at low engine power so they complete each other.

@GuyFolk Hmm... Maybe using both in unison or even having one activate at certain speed may add to the overall "Smartness". What do u say? （´-`）.｡oO( ... )

@ZoaMiki
So it's differential thrust then, it behave like gyro so no wonder why my first though was gyro.
And I think control surface will be more useful because when landing, the power setting will be low and differential thrust can potentially be less effective.
For me I'd use AngleOfSlip code for wing tips airbrake.

@GuyFolk I avoided using any gyros, so there are none on this, instead, there is code in the engines themselves. I didnt use angle of slip tho so thanks for the suggestion!

Not bad.
For yaw, I suggest you play with AngleOfSlip Funky tree, I assume you using gyro for yaw and if the gyro have AngleOfSlip correction code the plane will act like it actually have rudder.
And you can disable AngleOfSlip by AG1 to go completely yaw unstable like it is of now.
Constantly have to adjust for angle of slip manually is not a nice thing to have in fighter this high-tech anyway.

@X99STRIKER Oh, thank you!

@ZoaMiki
Keep up this level of quality and you will be platinum in no time.

@ZoaMiki
FYI, only the first three people tagged in one comment receive a notification.