Profile image

Shell poop apparatus 9000

Mod BaconAircraft  4.5 years ago
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @BobBobTheLandia same question.

    +1 4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,409 Tookan

    Is it already released or...

    +3 4.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    CRJ900Pilot Stop fighting With him

    4.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Oh I did not know that lmao @BaconAircraft

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Woah so realistic!

    +1 4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @CRJ900Pilot No can't do. Eject is automatic lmfao. Don't wanna eject? Dont fire! Lol

    +1 4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Yeah. The shell ejection was probably an afterthought, or at least wasn’t brought up early in development. On the other hand, however, the crew probably ejects the shells in non-war environments to keep the cabin free of clutter and potentially poisonous gasses from the spent shells. Then in a war situation they keep them for concealment. I have no idea though @BaconAircraft

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    I wouldn’t say the best, but the lowest maintenance and most simplistic yet gets the job done. The T-62 is watertight and have filter systems capably of maintaining a clean cabin in biological warfare and fallout.... but it has to open a hatch to yeet a casing when shooting... which defeats the purpose of a clean compartment system. @CRJ900Pilot

    +1 4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    No matter the situation, the Russian solutions are usually the memest. Used shells? Yeet them outside. Americans build million dollar space pen? Use a pencil. Americans build SST and space shuttle? Copy them. Lol @BaconAircraft

    +1 4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @BaconAircraft do you have discord i need help with a tank

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @BaconAircraft The russian yeet seems to be the best one for me XD

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @CRJ900Pilot Well I mean some does.
    There's 3 main ways shells are disposed of.
    1. I dont give a damn, casing exits breach falls on floor or a bin
    2. Russian YEET (T-62 to today) where spent casing gets yoten out of the turret
    3. Rheinmetall casing-b-gone where the shell casing essentially evaporates in the breach during combustion of the propellent charge and nothing is left. (Leopard 2s and abrams, and to name a few)

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Wow, very nice! I always thought takes kept their spent shells to hide where they’ve been. Anyway, the whole mechanism is very smooth and looks flawless

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,632 BeryllCorp

    Nice invention! The spent cartridges are a bit too big for the tank.

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    48.5k Sm10684

    When I first saw this I read:
    Shall poop asparagus 9000.

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    669 Jerba

    Yes, I didn’t know cause that’s what he said in the video that I was watching cause I was bored. I didn’t even watch the whole thing.@SnoWFLakE0s

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.0k SnoWFLakE0s

    @Jerba
    .
    Are you talking about the fume extractor? That doesn't need elevation to do its job. A neutral loading position is demonstrated here.

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @jamesPLANESii are u ok bud? how much crack did u snort

    +1 4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,146 Rickyjasper2

    I up dooted it

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    HurrrrrrRRRRRRRRRAAAA
    Ppppppppppppp
    💩💦🌊
    Ahhhhh....

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    WOAH!!

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    T H I C C

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    669 Jerba

    Hmm. Idk but the m1 abrams did this in a video I watched on the barrel bump thing. It’s funny cause I watched it yesterday day and I forgot everything already lol@BaconAircraft

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Nice! Tag me!

    4.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Jerba Nyet comrade. Modern stabilized tanks have negligible upward recoil due to presence of dampers and two-plane stabilisers. The T-62 requires the barrel to be returned to neutral position in order for the next shell to be loaded. For this example, when firing from an angle of elevation, the barrel goes down and returns to neutral elevation after firing for the loader to load, then raises to it's elevated position again. What you're talking about is recoil. This movement is a mechanical system at work.

    +4 4.5 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments