@Avro683Lancaster It's even smaller, like 8m length and 7m wingspan.
I tried a lot of thing and it looks like the problem, at least for now, came from the takeoff dolly/carriage. If you drop it into the ocean during takeoff you'll be fine. If you fly all the way out of the render range, it looks like you'll be fine too. (like dropping the carriage at Wright and fly to Krakabloa)
@TOMJeb117 No I think the USS Beast is already bigger than real life...
I measured the USS Beast against my Fugaku (64.3m wingspan) and found that USS Beast is about 107m wide , about 30% wider than Nimitz (76.8)
I only make functional instruments and rarely cosmetic instruments, this makes my cockpit less complicated and more practical.
I also use extra fuselages to cover up the cockpit ( cockpit "glass"), but this means I have to place the camera/actual cockpit inside the fuselage and sometimes right at the edge of different fuselages, limiting usable cockpit space.
Historically the BV 246 is basically an early anti-radiation missile (glide bomb) and thus doesn't have armaments beside the warhead.
If you want to carry more weapons, I think the choices are very limited given the space of BV246
MK108 should be able to fit in, though ammo count would be questionable.
If you don't mind hampering flying characteristics, R4M rockets under the wings should be cool too.
I think I can "translate" the description into better English...
Tank Destroyer is a unit in the real-time strategy game "red alert 2", belonging to the Germany nation as its special unit. Tank Destroyer is essentially a self-propelled anti-tank gun, its firepower is overwhelming against armored vehicles, but is weak against structures and infantries, which greatly reduced its practical value.
@CookieDefender
Just a note: One red band represents the first ship of the 1st Carrier Division (Akagi)
I wonder why would a seaplane fighter bear a recognition mark of a carrier... Very nice plane anyway.
@Marine As far as I know, in order to make an automatic walking, you need to have a series of pistons and rotators to work in perfect coordination, which is theoretically possible in vanilla game but requires perfect timing.
using that Automation mod sounds more reasonable to me.
@OC3LOT1142 I think this is another application of Aggressive AI. He probably rigged the explosives to detonate when the AI gives the FireGuns command, which triggers at close range regardless of direction.
@Jerba It's a thing of past already.
Basically in order to make a point, I linked my creation and one of other's as examples, and was accused of "advertising my own work".
No idea. I don't think you can mod an engine's altitude performance by overload alone.
In fact you might need to create a mod and change the altitude behaviour wholesale.
you know what sounds weird to me? It's that people who didn't seem to have a problem previously suddenly started to have problems.
Supposedly nothing changed recently in SP, and this really shouldn't happen.
Did you update a graphic card driver or something recently?
In order to be a money making machine, you need to be safe.
Cuz you can't earn enough from tickets to pay for the compensations, not to mention deaths would impact your boarding pass sales greatly.
My guess is that there are some wing "ribs" on the drawings that could be mistaken as elevators...
During the cold war, the West had very confusing references regarding MiG-21 early models. According to wiki, Jane's even thought the "Fishbed" is a Sukhoi thing, and gave an illustration for Su-9 "Fishpot" back in 1960.
@Minecraftpoweer "remove the forum" do you mean remove this post or sth?
I am fully aware it's not the end of the world. I posted this just to ask about the alleged advertisement.
@Minecraftpoweer In order to make a point, I gave links about my PAPI and the IED. PAPI was made by me, IED was made by someone else. They both use aggressive AI.
My point was : if you think sb. stole your Harrier, do you think I should say that IED stole the idea from my PAPI about using aggressive AI?
Of course not, right? So the point is, there will be people using your ideas and it's ok.
But that guy states that my action of posting and mentioning my creation is a kind of advertisement and thus "took appropriate actions".
@Minecraftpoweer Well my intention was to ask whether this was indeed "advertising my works". This can be posted, right?
And unfortunately mentioning the story of me being blocked was a integral part of it.
Sure I can "censor" all the wordings about being blocked, but is that necessary? and does that even work?
Also it's "don't post about a certain player who blocked you."
I didn't mention his name and I never will.
The rules mentioned three situations:
1. mentioning the PERSON who blocked you.
2. mentioning the PERSON who blocked your friend.
3. mentioning an incident in which certain people (PLURAL) blocked one another.
I just got blocked on the other thread so I have to come here.
Seriously, there are very, very limited things you can copyright here, is what I understand when I first joined SimplePlanes.
I can't and won't copyright concepts myself, not even for building "ways". In fact you can copy some simple subassemblies of mine like revolver cannons and I won't say a thing. Only some pretty unique or complicated parts would I request credit when you copy them.
And that's when you COPY the parts. If you use your own hands to build a similar one in the same ways, and it's your creation and your creation alone.
It's not abnormal to think so, right?
@ThatOneF15Eagle The problem is that this "runway" is segmented. A 1km runway needs 10 sections and thus needs 10 precisely marked spawn points.
I tried to spawn a 3km runway in one segment in early stages of this project and I found that it either crashes the game or destroy the runway, or both.
@IStoleYourMeme Perhaps he's just trying to make an update. The Simple Cheats is indeed a bit outdated.
@Nickr I checked, the CoM is slightly in front of CoL.
@Avro683Lancaster I flew it and... not even close.
The plane in question is like 3 times the speed and twice the agility.
@Avro683Lancaster It's even smaller, like 8m length and 7m wingspan.
I tried a lot of thing and it looks like the problem, at least for now, came from the takeoff dolly/carriage. If you drop it into the ocean during takeoff you'll be fine. If you fly all the way out of the render range, it looks like you'll be fine too. (like dropping the carriage at Wright and fly to Krakabloa)
@TOMJeb117 No I think the USS Beast is already bigger than real life...
I measured the USS Beast against my Fugaku (64.3m wingspan) and found that USS Beast is about 107m wide , about 30% wider than Nimitz (76.8)
I only make functional instruments and rarely cosmetic instruments, this makes my cockpit less complicated and more practical.
I also use extra fuselages to cover up the cockpit ( cockpit "glass"), but this means I have to place the camera/actual cockpit inside the fuselage and sometimes right at the edge of different fuselages, limiting usable cockpit space.
The death toll is now 33. It is now officially the second worse arson since the end of WWII.
Yeah I'm thinking about that, too....
+1been working on my (hopefully) silver-getting plane
Until I heard about Kyoto Animation...
@RussianAS That's true though
@RussianAS 103 is a lot bigger than 108 though?
If you can install an 103 you should be able to put a MK213 too...
Historically the BV 246 is basically an early anti-radiation missile (glide bomb) and thus doesn't have armaments beside the warhead.
If you want to carry more weapons, I think the choices are very limited given the space of BV246
MK108 should be able to fit in, though ammo count would be questionable.
+2If you don't mind hampering flying characteristics, R4M rockets under the wings should be cool too.
I'd like to have an independent setting for that. I had to use worse engines for my new plane because of just that.
I think I can "translate" the description into better English...
Tank Destroyer is a unit in the real-time strategy game "red alert 2", belonging to the Germany nation as its special unit. Tank Destroyer is essentially a self-propelled anti-tank gun, its firepower is overwhelming against armored vehicles, but is weak against structures and infantries, which greatly reduced its practical value.
+1@CookieDefender
Just a note: One red band represents the first ship of the 1st Carrier Division (Akagi)
I wonder why would a seaplane fighter bear a recognition mark of a carrier... Very nice plane anyway.
@Marine As far as I know, in order to make an automatic walking, you need to have a series of pistons and rotators to work in perfect coordination, which is theoretically possible in vanilla game but requires perfect timing.
using that Automation mod sounds more reasonable to me.
@OC3LOT1142 I think this is another application of Aggressive AI. He probably rigged the explosives to detonate when the AI gives the FireGuns command, which triggers at close range regardless of direction.
@Marine hmm... I never tried the mod so maybe you'll have to ask the creator of that mod for instructions.
@RussianAS Unguided rockets? Try selfDestructTimer (rocket will explode after certain time from launch)?
I think you need to take a look at the Automation Mod.
@Jerba It's a thing of past already.
Basically in order to make a point, I linked my creation and one of other's as examples, and was accused of "advertising my own work".
Mods by WNP 78:
Overload
Designer Suite
Advanced Targeting
Underwater Cam
Metric
Nukes... and more
So would it be too much to ask most of them, if not all of them becoming part of SP vanilla game soon?
+2@Minecraftpoweer I know what you meant, just saying that "super colorful" version would look hilarious lol.
"Colors are still placeholders"
Hey I got an idea, how about you make a rainbow-colored version beside the "normal" version? It's gonna be hilarious.
@SubXTribe Link at the end of description
@SubXTribe I've uploaded it.
@SubXTribe Right I'll make one, hold on
@SubXTribe I can make one, but it's not going to feature a bomb bay door. is that okay?
@Trainzo Thanks, glad you like it.
No idea. I don't think you can mod an engine's altitude performance by overload alone.
+3In fact you might need to create a mod and change the altitude behaviour wholesale.
@Dllama4 Please tag me when you finished
you know what sounds weird to me? It's that people who didn't seem to have a problem previously suddenly started to have problems.
+1Supposedly nothing changed recently in SP, and this really shouldn't happen.
Did you update a graphic card driver or something recently?
yeah cockpit speed.
+1Missile locking is also slaved to the cockpit, which stops you from making a useable radar...
Great, now make a cell phone that detonates it (FBI knock knock)
+1I like the Orange. It looks very experimental-ish anyway.
In order to be a money making machine, you need to be safe.
+4Cuz you can't earn enough from tickets to pay for the compensations, not to mention deaths would impact your boarding pass sales greatly.
My guess is that there are some wing "ribs" on the drawings that could be mistaken as elevators...
+2During the cold war, the West had very confusing references regarding MiG-21 early models. According to wiki, Jane's even thought the "Fishbed" is a Sukhoi thing, and gave an illustration for Su-9 "Fishpot" back in 1960.
@Minecraftpoweer Right then.
I'l just leave this post be, and continue my next plane.
@Minecraftpoweer "remove the forum" do you mean remove this post or sth?
I am fully aware it's not the end of the world. I posted this just to ask about the alleged advertisement.
@Minecraftpoweer Frustration is also my guess, but as you definitely know, a guess from the exactly same guy who got _ed by him usually doesn't count.
@Minecraftpoweer In order to make a point, I gave links about my PAPI and the IED. PAPI was made by me, IED was made by someone else. They both use aggressive AI.
My point was : if you think sb. stole your Harrier, do you think I should say that IED stole the idea from my PAPI about using aggressive AI?
Of course not, right? So the point is, there will be people using your ideas and it's ok.
But that guy states that my action of posting and mentioning my creation is a kind of advertisement and thus "took appropriate actions".
@Minecraftpoweer Well my intention was to ask whether this was indeed "advertising my works". This can be posted, right?
And unfortunately mentioning the story of me being blocked was a integral part of it.
Sure I can "censor" all the wordings about being blocked, but is that necessary? and does that even work?
Also it's "don't post about a certain player who blocked you."
I didn't mention his name and I never will.
The rules mentioned three situations:
1. mentioning the PERSON who blocked you.
2. mentioning the PERSON who blocked your friend.
3. mentioning an incident in which certain people (PLURAL) blocked one another.
I don't think my post fits any of the above.
Usually a lag is more related to GPU rather than CPU
Nice build by the way.
@Minecraftpoweer yea that's pretty much the way i see it...
I just got blocked on the other thread so I have to come here.
Seriously, there are very, very limited things you can copyright here, is what I understand when I first joined SimplePlanes.
I can't and won't copyright concepts myself, not even for building "ways". In fact you can copy some simple subassemblies of mine like revolver cannons and I won't say a thing. Only some pretty unique or complicated parts would I request credit when you copy them.
And that's when you COPY the parts. If you use your own hands to build a similar one in the same ways, and it's your creation and your creation alone.
It's not abnormal to think so, right?
Formosan mountain dog. (google it if you don't know about them)
+1Healthy, loyal, intelligent, and not too big.
@Mod LOL
@Mod I think you're like 4 hours late lol
Alright I put a new screenshot. There's no secret now...
@Aeromen Um well it's supposed to be a teaser-ish, just like how test vehicles are camouflaged...
But since Destroyerz117 already showed the full plane... yeah I'll take another one soon.
@ThatOneF15Eagle The problem is that this "runway" is segmented. A 1km runway needs 10 sections and thus needs 10 precisely marked spawn points.
+1I tried to spawn a 3km runway in one segment in early stages of this project and I found that it either crashes the game or destroy the runway, or both.