@Kevinairlines Record your screen when doing something, then use an online converter to convert it to a gif. Upload that gif to some website (I use steam), and then post it in a forum post like a picture.
No worries. I still think it should do well, as there are some entries that I would rather not spotlight. Points will be deducted, but you should still do well anyway. For the best score, I will score in the iOS bracket.
@TheNightmare811 That will work, although it will not show up. After you post the unlisted post, provide a link to the unlisted post in the comments of the challenge post.
Hm, entries in the challenge must be successors. If you wanted to post a successor then that's fine. I could judge the ship as it is, but I would have to deduct points as it isn't a successor.
@CWhat016 Ah, so you are having trouble moving a big vehicle? No worries. Just try to have a lot of lift, maybe using plenty of wings, and you could even get creative with some engines pointing down to help your wings.
@CWhat016 Ah, so you are trying to make a spaceworthy vessel? Well, for operation in a vacuum, I would recommend using RCNs for turning. For propulsion in a vacuum, a detacher-based system should work, although I do have some spaceworthy bullet-based drives on my profile (called impulse drives). Keep in mind that the vessel doesn't need to be operable in a vacuum, but If you do manage to make it spaceworthy, it will benefit your score immensely. So far, no entries are spaceworthy.
You can change the name by using the "edit" function, in which you can edit your description. You can go to the little downwards arrow next to the number of downloads, click it, and then press "edit" on the dropdown menu. No need to re-post the craft.
@Joco80 So I used the windows 10 "game clip" feature to record video, then I clipped/edited that video using a trash-tier (but free) film editing software to clip the video and add the text. I then searched "convert video to gif" on google, and clicked the first website. I think it is called easygif or something...
@PyrusEnderhunter Yeah, its a weird looking plane. Its predecessor was even more awkward though. Its odd shape is so it can accommodate any weapon for testing.
@MrSilverWolf Hm, I think doing what you think is right will serve you best. My only recommendation is not using excessively bright color schemes, and go easy on the color. I have seen too many rainbow-colored spaceships on this site lol. Also use beacon lights. They enhance the look immensely.
@EliteIndustries1 The landing gears were the last things that I added before posting it as unlisted. In hindsight, they were a little rushed. Thanks for the suggestion!
@TheDoodleBanger That can be done with a spread of zero, but it will only continue if the fireguns button is held. Upon investigating how negative Rate of fire works, I noticed that the negative rate of fire makes sure that only a certain amount of bullets can exist at a given time. The result is any bullets being terminated after the next barrage of bullets is released. That's why the range is short. In summary, the bullets do not stay still, but are replaced by another bullet after a short amount of time.
@AaltonenIndustries They are scaled to be very thin in two dimensions, while it is normal length in one direction. I do not remember how, exactly, i scaled it. I recommend that you use the overload mod to look at the setttings that I used to mod the engines.
@AaltonenIndustries If you were asking if I was the one flying the bomb, then no. I was flying the rescue VTOL.
@MrSilverWolf I mean, why not provide the link to the plane? haha yeah its a little sneaky but whatever.
I like the mechanical look of this.
@Kevinairlines There might be software for that on the app store. I used the screen recording software that comes with windows 10 (i use PC).
@Kevinairlines Record your screen when doing something, then use an online converter to convert it to a gif. Upload that gif to some website (I use steam), and then post it in a forum post like a picture.
@Tully2001 @BaconAircraft @MrMecha Thanks! I have also updated the wingart (the plane is nearly finished). You can take a look here
@MrSilverWolf Yes, that would be a fun post.
@FarrowAirlines Yep, plus the hue of blue looks better.
Just be sure to put the link to this in the comments section, as I don't want to forget.
No worries. I still think it should do well, as there are some entries that I would rather not spotlight. Points will be deducted, but you should still do well anyway. For the best score, I will score in the iOS bracket.
@TheNightmare811 That will work, although it will not show up. After you post the unlisted post, provide a link to the unlisted post in the comments of the challenge post.
@Z3RO Awesome, coming from you, that would look amazing.
@FarrowAirlines Yes
Hm, entries in the challenge must be successors. If you wanted to post a successor then that's fine. I could judge the ship as it is, but I would have to deduct points as it isn't a successor.
@CWhat016 Hm, I don't think leaning is too bad. As long as the ship is controllable.
@CWhat016 As in yaw motions? Add vertical stabilizers.
It actually looks quite nice, although I would have gone with a less bright shade of white.
@CWhat016 Then a lot of lift is good. More lift makes more stability. Also be sure to have your CoM and CoL in the right places.
@CWhat016 Ah, so you are having trouble moving a big vehicle? No worries. Just try to have a lot of lift, maybe using plenty of wings, and you could even get creative with some engines pointing down to help your wings.
@CWhat016 Ah, so you are trying to make a spaceworthy vessel? Well, for operation in a vacuum, I would recommend using RCNs for turning. For propulsion in a vacuum, a detacher-based system should work, although I do have some spaceworthy bullet-based drives on my profile (called impulse drives). Keep in mind that the vessel doesn't need to be operable in a vacuum, but If you do manage to make it spaceworthy, it will benefit your score immensely. So far, no entries are spaceworthy.
Also, I must ask, was this for the challenge, or is this a separate build?
@ZephyrSystems Sure! Just be sure to credit me so i don't think it's your own weapon design.
Soundgarden reference? Nice job on this one.
@CWhat016 The random floating piece should be removed, although it does contain the cockpit block
@Ctracerx2 I also managed to watch the part of the livestream that included you flying this. Fun to watch!
+1@Ctracerx2 Go ahead! Have fun with it!
@JakeTheDogg It has been about 4 months since I build an aircraft with a really thin/long cockpit, although that is subjective, of course.
@JakeTheDogg Yes, although I do enjoy using a thin cockpit once in a while.
You can change the name by using the "edit" function, in which you can edit your description. You can go to the little downwards arrow next to the number of downloads, click it, and then press "edit" on the dropdown menu. No need to re-post the craft.
@Joco80 So I used the windows 10 "game clip" feature to record video, then I clipped/edited that video using a trash-tier (but free) film editing software to clip the video and add the text. I then searched "convert video to gif" on google, and clicked the first website. I think it is called easygif or something...
Holy heck that challenge has a lot of great entries. Good job on this one.
@EliteIndustries1 @Visify @ThatOnion Thanks for the help! I have finished the plane!
@Tully2001 @MrSilverWolf @goboygo1 Many thanks for your help! I have finished the plane!
Nice. I'm still 1 year
@PyrusEnderhunter It flies quite well.
@PyrusEnderhunter Yeah, its a weird looking plane. Its predecessor was even more awkward though. Its odd shape is so it can accommodate any weapon for testing.
@PyrusEnderhunter I have updated the desc. that should give you some context.
@laSoul @Patrick20206 Thanks! The desc has been updated.
No problem! This build will be great when it is finished. The SP community as a whole will love it.
@MrSilverWolf Hm, I think doing what you think is right will serve you best. My only recommendation is not using excessively bright color schemes, and go easy on the color. I have seen too many rainbow-colored spaceships on this site lol. Also use beacon lights. They enhance the look immensely.
@MrSilverWolf Thanks! I have already beefed up the engine systems, and I plan on adding a tail cross or two.
@EliteIndustries1 The landing gears were the last things that I added before posting it as unlisted. In hindsight, they were a little rushed. Thanks for the suggestion!
@Visify Yeah, I was planning to add more to the wingtips. But I hadn't thought about the engines. Thanks for that suggestion!
@ThatOnion Thanks! I will try to add some of those improvements.
@Z3RO Haha, thanks! I think it could make a decent AA Vehicle.. but I would definitely make it less laggy.
@Patrick20206 Thanks! the desc has been updated.
Eh, used to be worse than jelly. There was plenty of NSFW content in the "today" tab. Now it's moderated so everything is family friendly.
@TheDoodleBanger That can be done with a spread of zero, but it will only continue if the fireguns button is held. Upon investigating how negative Rate of fire works, I noticed that the negative rate of fire makes sure that only a certain amount of bullets can exist at a given time. The result is any bullets being terminated after the next barrage of bullets is released. That's why the range is short. In summary, the bullets do not stay still, but are replaced by another bullet after a short amount of time.
@AaltonenIndustries They are scaled to be very thin in two dimensions, while it is normal length in one direction. I do not remember how, exactly, i scaled it. I recommend that you use the overload mod to look at the setttings that I used to mod the engines.
@CoBros2 I doubt I will be able to enter. I have a large scale project that I am staring in SP, and then I am continuing an IRL project after that.