@Graingy the Tu160 and B1 aren't actually in the same league, the B1 being a low altitude penetration bomber, and the tu160 being a high altitude fast moving bomber (fun fact, it's the heaviest military plane ever produced and still in service, pretty cool right ?).
The only reason people are hating it IS because it's a russian plane, american kidos can't recognize that something is great if it ain't american, even tho most times they don't know shit about the other plane.
@Luminaria you're giving points for speed ? Most planes don't have the same top speeds that's absurd...
I don't even see a criteria for the build quality or how efficient it is...
@WhaleFall Yes, at high altitudes, it can reach that speed at high altitudes and not under 10 secondes.
It's ok to not know much about planes, most plane's top speeds are calculated at high altitudes. Some planes can reach +mach 2 at high altitudes but can't reach mach at sea level.
@WhaleFall
Acceleration is comedy as much as the top speed is, the plane is flying at +mach even at 50% Throttle. It turns like crazy and even tho I didn't open the debug console to get the numbers I'm sure that it pulls more than 20Gs at almost every turns. It feels like an arcade version of Ace Combat (this game already being arcade)...
You say that you did build this with mobile players in mind but that's not why you didn't put any FT, it's more likely because you don't know anything about it, and that's not a bad thing, I suck at it too, but I do accept criticism and won't pull out stupid excuses when somebody point this out.
Also, a good flight model doesn't always need FT, so that's just an excuse.
On top of that, +850 parts and +3800 perf cost isn't that mobile friendly.
Just accept criticism
Your build is beautiful, it just doesn't fly good.
@Graingy ok, would have done the joke anyway. Lucky for you it isn't a joke.
Send me a message on discord so I can provide some screenshots on how to solve the issue.
So looks over performance ? It's an interesting question, I do think that looks are more important than performance, but is it the case in a low parts build ?
@SC2311 It's already really good, and it's visible from far away tht you're really trying to improve your skills and make interesting builds. SimplePlanes has a weird progression curve, so it's okey to have less skills in like making a flight model than making a fuselage.
For the part count, the look of it is already very good, could be improved of course but it's really good, and funkytrees also something else, I'm a total noob at it, but you can seek help everywhere, all the codes I use are maybe by people that's I reached for some help :)
Anyway, keep it up !
(Sorry for my crappy english)
@SC2311 Thanks ! It's not perfect at all but it was the max I could achieve with my skills, still pretty happy with it even tho I'm remember the last two ~ three months weren't fun at all anymore, just focusing over doing ad detail then another then another
I just LOVE this airplane, it's really cool to see a good one out here.
I really like it, under 1000 parts but still with great details, the overall shape of the plane is here and the body looks really good, the wings could have had a better airfoil but hey at least it's fuselage wings.
I like the fact that the interiors are simple and without much to do but at least everything works and you did it which is great, I also like the dedication to make the two of them even tho it's a one player game, this kind of motivation is nice to see.
The flight model is way way better than most builds out there, it feels like a real plane, doesn't do to many crazy stuff but still is fun enough.
My only point but I'm being picky is that I'm not sure that the Tornado could super-cruise, maybe I'm wrong tho, same for it pulling 18° of AoA, I don't think it could pull this much.
Overall awesome build.
A lot of parts for many details, we like details, details are great.
But sadly details went sto some places and not others, the cockpit is beautiful but the wings shape really is good looking (at least it's fuselage wings).
Some goes for the fligh characteristics, it flys like an RC plane, maybe it was your goal but I find it kinda sad that such an high detailed plane that could be use to simulate air flight got such a crappy fligh model.
I really like the description and the whole manual, really useful.
@TheMouse Active on Discord yes, but I think it's more about being in the SPMC discord server, since it brings you closer to some devs and other moderators, thus making them know you a little bit better.
I'm not sure at all tho, it was only a thing I always tough worked that way.
The Mig 21B actually had "bumps" on the wings where the landing gear retracted, that's why yours couldn't go in all the way. Would have looked more aesthetic and realistic to make these.
@Graingy russian copy on the design solutions, some questions have the same answers. But build for an other puropose
@DCSplanepro12 how do you get what ?
@Graingy the Tu160 and B1 aren't actually in the same league, the B1 being a low altitude penetration bomber, and the tu160 being a high altitude fast moving bomber (fun fact, it's the heaviest military plane ever produced and still in service, pretty cool right ?).
The only reason people are hating it IS because it's a russian plane, american kidos can't recognize that something is great if it ain't american, even tho most times they don't know shit about the other plane.
+3Don't ask for upvotes :) people will upvote if the build is cool 👍🏾
Nice to see that you finished it, keep going I'm sure you'll be a great builder
+2If you're talking about upvotes, well I just don't care about them
@Luminaria womp womp yourself 🥴
@Luminaria you're giving points for speed ? Most planes don't have the same top speeds that's absurd...
+1I don't even see a criteria for the build quality or how efficient it is...
that's actually pretty cool for ten parts haha
@GuardianAerospace I feel like you're the same as I am, 20% of building and 80% of looking at your creation haha
+1@GuardianAerospace understandable, as long as you enjoy the game :)
You're getting better
Will there be a cockpit interior ? The build doesn't seem that detailed and complicated it shouldn't be hard to cut a cockpit in it.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover generally, leading-edge slats only go down, I also noticed that yours are inverted, the slats should go down when pitching up.
are the slats...going up ???...
@GuardianAerospace it was a joke because the shape isn't that smooth
+1Who cares ?
It ain't a multiplayer game, just have fun by yourself instead of finding joy in others caring about you.
+3It looks like it was made in simpleplanes
+2@WhaleFall Yes, at high altitudes, it can reach that speed at high altitudes and not under 10 secondes.
+3It's ok to not know much about planes, most plane's top speeds are calculated at high altitudes. Some planes can reach +mach 2 at high altitudes but can't reach mach at sea level.
@F8boa by pulling the handles on the side of your sit towards you
+1@WhaleFall
Acceleration is comedy as much as the top speed is, the plane is flying at +mach even at 50% Throttle. It turns like crazy and even tho I didn't open the debug console to get the numbers I'm sure that it pulls more than 20Gs at almost every turns.
It feels like an arcade version of Ace Combat (this game already being arcade)...
You say that you did build this with mobile players in mind but that's not why you didn't put any FT, it's more likely because you don't know anything about it, and that's not a bad thing, I suck at it too, but I do accept criticism and won't pull out stupid excuses when somebody point this out.
Also, a good flight model doesn't always need FT, so that's just an excuse.
On top of that, +850 parts and +3800 perf cost isn't that mobile friendly.
Just accept criticism
Your build is beautiful, it just doesn't fly good.
+1The model is absolutely beautiful, but the flight model is sadly a total mess.
But I can't point out the work done on the build quality, it's pure beauty
+3@MrCOPTY just let them be virgins
+1@Graingy yes sure
+2@Grob0s0VBRa nope, just some reshade settings
@Graingy ok, would have done the joke anyway. Lucky for you it isn't a joke.
Send me a message on discord so I can provide some screenshots on how to solve the issue.
Was the almost naked young lady necessary on the front of the tank ? Also, why hide it on the screenshots ?
+1I do have a fix for this
So looks over performance ? It's an interesting question, I do think that looks are more important than performance, but is it the case in a low parts build ?
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 yes you're right
the city in this map has already been used in another SP modded map haha
lovely !
+2@winterro damn didn't got it, can't wait to see it
winterro making a plane O_O
@ollielebanania self tag
The plane is what it is, but almost 4 years of dedication on a build deserves an upvote
+1@ollielebanania what manage you to do in 3.7 years, it's a lot there must be a lot of stuff in it
+23.7 year in the making ?? saying that for the cloud ?
@Jacobdaniel Yes, I used discord to host my images on the website but since it's not possible anymore I have to update the page, sorry.
@SC2311 oh bruh that's a shitty situation haha, well don't hesitate to ping me on a post or any forum if you seek some help :)
+1@SC2311 If you want I can give you my discord so if you need any help I could help you
+1@SC2311 It's already really good, and it's visible from far away tht you're really trying to improve your skills and make interesting builds. SimplePlanes has a weird progression curve, so it's okey to have less skills in like making a flight model than making a fuselage.
+1For the part count, the look of it is already very good, could be improved of course but it's really good, and funkytrees also something else, I'm a total noob at it, but you can seek help everywhere, all the codes I use are maybe by people that's I reached for some help :)
Anyway, keep it up !
(Sorry for my crappy english)
@SC2311 Thanks ! It's not perfect at all but it was the max I could achieve with my skills, still pretty happy with it even tho I'm remember the last two ~ three months weren't fun at all anymore, just focusing over doing ad detail then another then another
+1High quality ? Please tag me on these, I'll be a pleasure to test flight your builds
(If possible, tag on both)
@SyntheticL good old times when my average part count was under 1000 parts
+1Lovely build !
I just LOVE this airplane, it's really cool to see a good one out here.
I really like it, under 1000 parts but still with great details, the overall shape of the plane is here and the body looks really good, the wings could have had a better airfoil but hey at least it's fuselage wings.
I like the fact that the interiors are simple and without much to do but at least everything works and you did it which is great, I also like the dedication to make the two of them even tho it's a one player game, this kind of motivation is nice to see.
The flight model is way way better than most builds out there, it feels like a real plane, doesn't do to many crazy stuff but still is fun enough.
My only point but I'm being picky is that I'm not sure that the Tornado could super-cruise, maybe I'm wrong tho, same for it pulling 18° of AoA, I don't think it could pull this much.
Overall awesome build.
A lot of parts for many details, we like details, details are great.
+6But sadly details went sto some places and not others, the cockpit is beautiful but the wings shape really is good looking (at least it's fuselage wings).
Some goes for the fligh characteristics, it flys like an RC plane, maybe it was your goal but I find it kinda sad that such an high detailed plane that could be use to simulate air flight got such a crappy fligh model.
I really like the description and the whole manual, really useful.
@TheMouse Active on Discord yes, but I think it's more about being in the SPMC discord server, since it brings you closer to some devs and other moderators, thus making them know you a little bit better.
+2I'm not sure at all tho, it was only a thing I always tough worked that way.
the real game begins !
The Mig 21B actually had "bumps" on the wings where the landing gear retracted, that's why yours couldn't go in all the way. Would have looked more aesthetic and realistic to make these.
@MrCOPTY I'd love to
+1