@EternalDarkness wait, for real?!... tho... I still have all my albums from 2012 onwards in imgur. so I'm not sure what might be the source of the problem.
exactly what I've pointed out in some of my posts. a known bug is memory leak due to pause, but that's just a minor thing. the annoying thing is that it barely uses resources at it's disposal, yet, it lags like if I were running Nier Automata at 4K... first off, the game always runs the GPU on Idle and cpu is barely on 30-50% load, also the RAM usae is farily low when comparing to games that can actually put a pc to it's knees for not enough resources. the game choke's itself for resources despite having a ginormous amount of resources, which varies a bit from each device.
@bjac0 This! I ahd to put dummy ammo with a fuel cell in mid on my tank to recreate the ammo storage, it actually explodes xdd but on airplanes it's different. My curent drachen has 4x200kg boxes of ammo in the nose of the airplane, while I only set the ammo as deadweight, it'd be really cool if those boxes actually spent their ammo and liberate weight for the airplane. it would make for better weight calculations too.
add the Ejection input, so we press a separate button and ejct from the canopy. add it like an FT so we can link it to various things(or multiple seats too)
following the VR switches, add "potentiometers", if possible, with custom input or FT support. it can be useful for multiple purposes inside the cockpit. it's be different from normal rotators because you could "interact" with the rotator itself to adjust a certain setting.
Ability to add text onto fuselage(and with high definition) wether it is for fancy fuselage names or for text inside the cockpit. so we can place text above each gauge or general section to indicate it's purpose. also with customizable font.
@AndrewGarrison since gauges are planned, will they vary in style and measurement?
for example, most common ones are in knots and have all sorts of flashy paint, but WWII gauges could go from Metric, to Imperial to knots. also their style is very unique, especially comparing german vs allied gauges. it would be very useful if we could select the style of the gauge, or at least... change the font of the numbers and the needle style. Another thing is screens, will we have circular screens? as for radars? could they support FunkyTrees?
also... pls Add the RPM related to specific engine, (as in AmmoCount style of code), I'm having a serious headache calculting the RPM of my engines, worse with variable pitch propellers...
well... as example you have my two companies. M.A (Marcox Aeronautics), which produces both civilian and military aircrafts. It comprises of my own designs and has as goal to have the best reliability and quality of aircraft avaible. My aircrafts sustain a rigorous failure test before passing prototype stage.
MFzF or MF for short (Marcox FlugzeugFabrik) was created as a WWII variant of my current M.A company. it has the same motto, altho it goes more for pushing the boundaries of technology avaiable in the third reich, thus requiring months of research on avaiable components of the era.
quite interesting propulsion system. tho I recommend you setting the front sidegrip around 120-130% for better stability withoud doing donuts everywhere.
@RavenG59 I may not know how to make mods, but me and @vcharng know a lot about radars because we had to build our own radars for WWII aircrafts, (our aicrafts actually share the same FuG 240 radar, with mine getting an additional Fug 350).
if you want info or useful links, feel free to ping me! :3
really useful info, this explains why my automated airbrakes didn't get overrid by manual control because the manual control was on the second bracket...
@Kennneth I know that for today's standards, it is highly outpaced... but this 3rd gen I7 is on par or better than a 2nd gen desktop I7... take into account I've been running this laptop since 2015 or earlier. and desktop I7's LGA15xx didn't get an upgrade in core count until 6-7nth gen. It is nontheless a 4C/8T CPU running at 3.2Ghz nonstop
@AtlasMilitaryIndustries managed to beat it using the terrain, used flares to get behind the mountain, then appeared on the other side of the mountain, aquired lock and got the kill with a single AIM9J Sidewinder.
this aircraft is giving me a serious headache, even if my aicraft are capable of dodging the first salvo of missiles, such a spam of missiles ends up killing my aircraft... will have to go out of my conventional ways to beat it.
maybe one day, tho flight school is very expensive, wether it's the air force or civilian pilot. I know for sure that if I want something, I can do it, but money is the problem...
I read somewhere on youtube that you can take a trial flight in your local airport if it's allowed, so an instructor teaches you in flight and stuff.
regarding high part creations... I like to push the limits of my creativity, and my pc's limits. Sure, SP is incredibly un-optimized for the resources it uses, it barely uses 30% of CPU power out of a 3rd gen I7 and barely uses more than 2GB of VRAM, but somehow, it is very CPU intensive, it likes high core count over frequency. a lot of high part count tings come from detailed parts like speedometers or things like decals, since we don't have a paintob feature or importing a .png so we can save parts. sometimes I have to duplicate the parts of an entire plane ust to have it in a two-tone paintscheme, imagine the part saving with just some .png images thrown here and there.
From my point of view, SP needs to solve the spaghetti of code before upgrading, I used to play KSP with at least 20 mods and that was way more demanding but optimized than SP, yet, SP is such a spaghetti of code that it doesn't use the given resources apropiately, I wrote a post about it in my bio. Unity has it's limits, it's an engine for small games, not for an overcomplex amount of stuff. if it were a newer game, maybe keep the same layout, but transfer it to a more powerful engine like Unreal engine or Havok, where we can go nuts about building and crashing stuff.
For point 1) SP is far from perfected, we still need more sliders and activation groups because there's simply not enough to make all the functions without a very clunky working mechanism. Modders have created such incredible maps, that I wish they were the default maps, visual effects and even parts completely from scratch, those things should have been by default in the game! take into account SP is no longer about aircrafts, it's aircrafts, ground vehicles, naval vessels and even spaceships.
Also, Android is a market now, and the game has to accomodate to both worlds, and difference between monster pc's and a RoG phone, there's still a gigantic gap in performance. they're completely different operating systems, one based on Linux an the other on Windows or IOs. you can't compare an android 2.2Ghz octacore vs an entry level 3.4Ghz quad core with hyperthreading, and not even joke about the ultra high gamma 4.5Ghz 12C / 24 threads that the new ryzen has. Graphics is even more of a joke.
build... maybe a week or two + an entire week of testing. +1000 can take me an entire year if it's historical stuff, because it's extremely hard to find certain blueprints or info whatsoever.
Yay, another FACH plane! :3 may I challenge you to shoot down my M.A Red arrow? I designed it to compete with the chilean F-5 tiger II, I'll tag you in it.
my laptop can handle up to 5000 parts, up to 3000 with moderate lag.
o7 mate, you were a great Mod.
+2wow... never expected SP to ave this level of easter egg...
+2@EternalDarkness wait, for real?!... tho... I still have all my albums from 2012 onwards in imgur. so I'm not sure what might be the source of the problem.
@WNP78, may I ask, what's the current code for posting images on forum/ airplanes posts? my posts with pictures are no longer visible due to this...
exactly what I've pointed out in some of my posts. a known bug is memory leak due to pause, but that's just a minor thing. the annoying thing is that it barely uses resources at it's disposal, yet, it lags like if I were running Nier Automata at 4K... first off, the game always runs the GPU on Idle and cpu is barely on 30-50% load, also the RAM usae is farily low when comparing to games that can actually put a pc to it's knees for not enough resources. the game choke's itself for resources despite having a ginormous amount of resources, which varies a bit from each device.
+3Slat and flap wing parts. currently, it's extremely hard to simulate flaps and slats in-game, so this additin would be very useful.
+12@bjac0 This! I ahd to put dummy ammo with a fuel cell in mid on my tank to recreate the ammo storage, it actually explodes xdd but on airplanes it's different. My curent drachen has 4x200kg boxes of ammo in the nose of the airplane, while I only set the ammo as deadweight, it'd be really cool if those boxes actually spent their ammo and liberate weight for the airplane. it would make for better weight calculations too.
+1add the Ejection input, so we press a separate button and ejct from the canopy. add it like an FT so we can link it to various things(or multiple seats too)
+3following the VR switches, add "potentiometers", if possible, with custom input or FT support. it can be useful for multiple purposes inside the cockpit. it's be different from normal rotators because you could "interact" with the rotator itself to adjust a certain setting.
+6Ability to add text onto fuselage(and with high definition) wether it is for fancy fuselage names or for text inside the cockpit. so we can place text above each gauge or general section to indicate it's purpose. also with customizable font.
+39@AndrewGarrison custom text... that'd be trully a blessing!
+5@POTETOZ
awesome video hahaha.
@AndrewGarrison since gauges are planned, will they vary in style and measurement?
+1for example, most common ones are in knots and have all sorts of flashy paint, but WWII gauges could go from Metric, to Imperial to knots. also their style is very unique, especially comparing german vs allied gauges. it would be very useful if we could select the style of the gauge, or at least... change the font of the numbers and the needle style. Another thing is screens, will we have circular screens? as for radars? could they support FunkyTrees?
also... pls Add the RPM related to specific engine, (as in AmmoCount style of code), I'm having a serious headache calculting the RPM of my engines, worse with variable pitch propellers...
@BlackThuNDR ty!
+1@BlackThuNDR mayyybe this fits for your egg-airforce... maybe not xd
+2are fictional planes allowed?
+1incredible detail and the handling and grip feel really good.
+2@tucan oh, ok.
well... as example you have my two companies. M.A (Marcox Aeronautics), which produces both civilian and military aircrafts. It comprises of my own designs and has as goal to have the best reliability and quality of aircraft avaible. My aircrafts sustain a rigorous failure test before passing prototype stage.
+1MFzF or MF for short (Marcox FlugzeugFabrik) was created as a WWII variant of my current M.A company. it has the same motto, altho it goes more for pushing the boundaries of technology avaiable in the third reich, thus requiring months of research on avaiable components of the era.
does an F-117 fit in this category? I'm asking because of the tailerons... altho it uses it's fuselage and wings as lift surface...
@Wyalolworld thank you for the upvote! I hope you enjoy this cool experimental engine n.n
@Dazare lol, thank you for the upvote!
@Bife @Inuyasha8215 @RicardoAs1515 Thank you very much! n.n
+1quite interesting propulsion system. tho I recommend you setting the front sidegrip around 120-130% for better stability withoud doing donuts everywhere.
@RavenG59 I may not know how to make mods, but me and @vcharng know a lot about radars because we had to build our own radars for WWII aircrafts, (our aicrafts actually share the same FuG 240 radar, with mine getting an additional Fug 350).
if you want info or useful links, feel free to ping me! :3
really useful info, this explains why my automated airbrakes didn't get overrid by manual control because the manual control was on the second bracket...
wait, Nagisa deleted his content again?...
@Kennneth I know that for today's standards, it is highly outpaced... but this 3rd gen I7 is on par or better than a 2nd gen desktop I7... take into account I've been running this laptop since 2015 or earlier. and desktop I7's LGA15xx didn't get an upgrade in core count until 6-7nth gen. It is nontheless a 4C/8T CPU running at 3.2Ghz nonstop
@SodiumIodide laptop Samsung Series 7 chronos 2013: I7 3635QM, 12GB RAM DDR3, 1TB SSD, External GPU XFX OC edition Radeon RX 580 8GB and two screens at 1920x1080p
@Airsupremacy01
my deep apologies for the late entry, busy with work and other stuff. I wanted that you could see what it was about at least. n.n
@AviationHJM thank you very much! I hope you can give plenty of use to this replica gyrosight!
+1@AtlasMilitaryIndustries managed to beat it using the terrain, used flares to get behind the mountain, then appeared on the other side of the mountain, aquired lock and got the kill with a single AIM9J Sidewinder.
this aircraft is giving me a serious headache, even if my aicraft are capable of dodging the first salvo of missiles, such a spam of missiles ends up killing my aircraft... will have to go out of my conventional ways to beat it.
gonna slap this on my tanks peko
+1maybe one day, tho flight school is very expensive, wether it's the air force or civilian pilot. I know for sure that if I want something, I can do it, but money is the problem...
I read somewhere on youtube that you can take a trial flight in your local airport if it's allowed, so an instructor teaches you in flight and stuff.
@iloveworld4723 thank you for the upvote! n.n
regarding high part creations... I like to push the limits of my creativity, and my pc's limits. Sure, SP is incredibly un-optimized for the resources it uses, it barely uses 30% of CPU power out of a 3rd gen I7 and barely uses more than 2GB of VRAM, but somehow, it is very CPU intensive, it likes high core count over frequency. a lot of high part count tings come from detailed parts like speedometers or things like decals, since we don't have a paintob feature or importing a .png so we can save parts. sometimes I have to duplicate the parts of an entire plane ust to have it in a two-tone paintscheme, imagine the part saving with just some .png images thrown here and there.
@Airsupremacy01 was thinkg on doing it based on weapon groups, tho I need to remake the code, as the previous one didn't behave as I wanted...
manual transmission allowed... time to get creative with FT hehehe
@Fox00One thank you for the upvote! I hope you enjoy the aircraft!
last year December, but purely because of delivery work, otherwise... can't even recall the last time, but probs 2019
@UsualPiooneer yo, a TMP fan!
+1T, specifically looking for either an M103 or M104. M104 is extremely similar to the 2jz, but carries timing chain instead of timing belt.
+1@TheCommentReader they are slow to take off, mainly because of the poor stall speed and because of the engines.
it looks really cool, I'm hyped to fly it in-game
From my point of view, SP needs to solve the spaghetti of code before upgrading, I used to play KSP with at least 20 mods and that was way more demanding but optimized than SP, yet, SP is such a spaghetti of code that it doesn't use the given resources apropiately, I wrote a post about it in my bio. Unity has it's limits, it's an engine for small games, not for an overcomplex amount of stuff. if it were a newer game, maybe keep the same layout, but transfer it to a more powerful engine like Unreal engine or Havok, where we can go nuts about building and crashing stuff.
For point 1) SP is far from perfected, we still need more sliders and activation groups because there's simply not enough to make all the functions without a very clunky working mechanism. Modders have created such incredible maps, that I wish they were the default maps, visual effects and even parts completely from scratch, those things should have been by default in the game! take into account SP is no longer about aircrafts, it's aircrafts, ground vehicles, naval vessels and even spaceships.
Also, Android is a market now, and the game has to accomodate to both worlds, and difference between monster pc's and a RoG phone, there's still a gigantic gap in performance. they're completely different operating systems, one based on Linux an the other on Windows or IOs. you can't compare an android 2.2Ghz octacore vs an entry level 3.4Ghz quad core with hyperthreading, and not even joke about the ultra high gamma 4.5Ghz 12C / 24 threads that the new ryzen has. Graphics is even more of a joke.
+1build... maybe a week or two + an entire week of testing. +1000 can take me an entire year if it's historical stuff, because it's extremely hard to find certain blueprints or info whatsoever.
Yay, another FACH plane! :3 may I challenge you to shoot down my M.A Red arrow? I designed it to compete with the chilean F-5 tiger II, I'll tag you in it.
+1