@DeveloperKorzalerke Nah not really. The only extra physics calculation engines have is "apply this much force in this direction". Also the other engine's performance costs are nearly 1/10 of this one's.
@ZWLenning Thanks :)
@Madmaximus
We'll see how thorough my "leave" is. I probably won't have time to build detailed aircraft like this any more, but I think I will still be active here on the site, especially considering I'm the all-time most active user lol
Honestly, you're not the only one. For me, when it comes to building the cockpit, building progress slows to a snails pace. To make a realistic one, it's so much work and effort that goes into minimal reward. I mean, giving your plane a cockpit almost doubles its upvote score and makes users more excited for your future builds, but it quadruples the work, and making a cockpit is really janky and isn't supported very well. And making a cockpit means you need to make all the other systems more functional in your plane like making a better engine etc. Also we don't have enough customisability with the gauges, for example the arcs for the ASIs aren't adjustable (grinds my gears AF 😬) and all the gauges are from the same era and there's no realistic and normal looking artificial horizon. Also engines are basic asf and don't have basic things like mixture, realistic prop aerofoils, or temperatures so you have to improvise them yourself. Not yo mention propellers weigh like 700 KG and take a billion years to reach maximum RPM.
.
Gee. Sounds like I should be learning how to use plane maker in X Plane. XD
@ColonelCanada Oh yeah you did. WOW. I'll also upvote all of your stuff. It's just your notifications got obscured by DeveloperKorzalerke's ones lol
+5@DeveloperKorzalerke 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@Stanmich Well, it's 96% made by me, then Spillo made the radios, and BaconEggs disabled the drag for me.
+1Gee br you want sort out your reshade settings...
+5Guys I need to beat SledDriver before Jundroo overtakes me help
+5Farmers take note
+8@MrShenanigansSP The performance cost of this individual part is 60
+2Rip real time reflections turned off
+2@DeveloperKorzalerke Nah not really. The only extra physics calculation engines have is "apply this much force in this direction". Also the other engine's performance costs are nearly 1/10 of this one's.
Because it's annoying and spammy if you most more
+2@TheGliderGuy The map is this one. Thanks for liking it!
+2@PlaneFlightX If you wanna make all the individual buttons and circuit breakers functional, you can do that if you want :)
+1@MOPCKOEDNISHE Wow you're a legend bro! Thank you so much! :D
@EternalDarkness Thanks! :D
+1I'm assuming you got a new computer?
@CaptFoxworth19 The _ symbol?
+1@CaptFoxworth19 3 underscores in a row
___+1
@Timplanes @Dragorans @WaitBreadIsntAfruit Thanks! :)
+1@ZWLenning Thanks :)
+1@Madmaximus
We'll see how thorough my "leave" is. I probably won't have time to build detailed aircraft like this any more, but I think I will still be active here on the site, especially considering I'm the all-time most active user lol
@DogeToTheMoon It's based off a Lycoming O-470, which I think is a flat V6, which apparently is different to a boxer 6 lol
+1@BeastHunter You grab the black strip at the bottom and drag it up
+3@AVFLYER Yup! Hoping to release a low part one sometime next week :)
+2Either that, or ⛔ airlines
+4The no livery
+3Oop, was this meant to be public?
+2@PlaneFlightX Er, it was actually much better than this. XD
+1People who don't like shitposts are butt-hurt poeple who feel ratioed. Don't worry about them. They're funny :)
+11e g g
+1@MrSilverWolf That's kinda the story with the whole map lol
+2@DeveloperKorzalerke Well, you can't exactly teach someone how to be mechanically minded...
+3Instead of searching how to make things in SimplePlanes, you need to look at the real thing and see how it's done, and replicate it in SimplePlanes :)
+1Do you just wanna test this to make sure all the radio stuff works?
@Oculite1 I'm glad you like it! :)
merry birthday and a happy new thanksgiving
+1Wow, it is quite impressive how well this effect works :D
+3The only problem is you can't really use it on tapering edges or uneven curves..
Did you mean to upload this public?
When at high frame rates, getting the correct level of zoom is quite difficult. Any chance you could make an update that adjust how fast this zooms?
hold up
that aint your cockpit...
I play it at a steady pace :)
+6Just set collision response to none and go on a ramming rampage. Yay
+6I wish there were more default seat settings ngl
+16What makes this one any different from all the others?
+2don't we have enough already?
+1Honestly, you're not the only one. For me, when it comes to building the cockpit, building progress slows to a snails pace. To make a realistic one, it's so much work and effort that goes into minimal reward. I mean, giving your plane a cockpit almost doubles its upvote score and makes users more excited for your future builds, but it quadruples the work, and making a cockpit is really janky and isn't supported very well. And making a cockpit means you need to make all the other systems more functional in your plane like making a better engine etc. Also we don't have enough customisability with the gauges, for example the arcs for the ASIs aren't adjustable (grinds my gears AF 😬) and all the gauges are from the same era and there's no realistic and normal looking artificial horizon. Also engines are basic asf and don't have basic things like mixture, realistic prop aerofoils, or temperatures so you have to improvise them yourself. Not yo mention propellers weigh like 700 KG and take a billion years to reach maximum RPM.
+2.
Gee. Sounds like I should be learning how to use plane maker in X Plane. XD
No paneling
+2good thing it can't attack ukraine any more
+5Hmm for some reason for me it still isn't popping up...
@Numbers2 it's for comments too
@xNotDumb cause ai dumb
It's kinda weird because that's way beyond the actual number of characters comments are able to show
+1Thought I had seen this egg thing before!
+1