@xNotDumb You just completely missed the point. If I AM trying to insult you, why don't you try to ignore ME? Am I that respectul for trying to insult you in every way possible? I'm just trying to say that begging for upvotes is not allowed. Even if it's NOT for points.
@Mekomara
are you below that speed? Reminder that SP uses metric as raw data. Speed is actually in m/s. If you're using km/h, go to calculator and divide the number by 3.6.
@xNotDumb
Why don't try to ignore it then?
Why don't try to ignore me instead of debating about this supposedly "not rule breaking request"?
Besides, the rule is there. "Don't beg for upvotes". It doesn't matter for who it is, it's just not allowed.
Please read the actual post first before you comment T... Just please. How hard is it to take just 15 seconds and type "Sorry, but I don't have any Idea"? I know I'm being rude, but just, please. Please give your message a little more effort than just a simple T...
@GorillaGuerrilla
when did I say I hate thrust vectoring?
I said it's bullshit because I love it so much. yes I know that's not how you use the word bullshit, but I just love putting bullshit after thrust vectoring or smth
Also please. Space out your sentences next time, because this message is too big.
Well, I mean, if you're using just one engine, then I suggest you change that. Get the BFE-150 and a low powered jet engine. First off, you want to disconnect the BFE-150, to measure the low powered engine's thrust to weight, while recalibrating it to whatever number you'd like. These numbers can be found in the info menu.
Then, you proceed to attach the BFE-150 again (please make the mass 0, and the collision to false), and then tune up or down the engine's power. After that, put "Throttle>0.9" on the BFE-150, and finally, position them in the same place.
I myself don't search any G-limiters, instead I use the input "Activate8 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch" on a rotator.
@PantheraShojii
it looks too much like a canard, I'm sorry.
Besides, nobody really puts guns on leading edge root extensions. If you wanna count the Blended wing fuselage as root extensions, you really need to check again.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
Like I said, no need for a TVC. If it performs very well, then it might get a good point. And, if it is able to pull off such maneuvers without a thrust vectoring, it might receive a high point. Because that's amazing.
@Chickendude
gaada udah
@xNotDumb
You just completely missed the point. If I AM trying to insult you, why don't you try to ignore ME? Am I that respectul for trying to insult you in every way possible? I'm just trying to say that begging for upvotes is not allowed. Even if it's NOT for points.
@Mekomara
are you below that speed? Reminder that SP uses metric as raw data. Speed is actually in m/s. If you're using km/h, go to calculator and divide the number by 3.6.
nice, keep goin'.
@xNotDumb
Why don't try to ignore it then?
Why don't try to ignore me instead of debating about this supposedly "not rule breaking request"?
Besides, the rule is there. "Don't beg for upvotes". It doesn't matter for who it is, it's just not allowed.
@xNotDumb
...Ok?
Also please stop using "sussy", it isn't even funny anymore at this point.
I hate those kinds of tones.
@xNotDumb
still, I sense a rule breaker.
cool.
dude. It's an Eagle II. HOLY SHIT IT'S AN EAGLE II TAG ME ON IT
Dude, nice! Very nice!
Please read the actual post first before you comment T... Just please. How hard is it to take just 15 seconds and type "Sorry, but I don't have any Idea"? I know I'm being rude, but just, please. Please give your message a little more effort than just a simple T...
@Korzalerke @AirCrashInvestigationFLR
No.
@Krikkit42
Thanks, if you want to see another one, there's the F-5E. But since it's the F-5E, it's going to be a little less amazing.
@Krikkit42
didn't pay attention. I did publish it anyway. If you're curious what it is, it's the MiG-29.
@rexzion
upgraded F-5Es can have these
@MABUR
iya, banyak yg komen susah ya jadi diganti aja
@KanKalashnikov
just do what you did like last time. And put some throttleResponse while you're at it.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
now you can, congrats!
Just reupload it as a successor.
@Numbers2
@Falco7
@Th3rmoplylae
Ok, next time, please have it as a succesor to my post, I almost missed it.
@GorillaGuerrilla
@KanKalashnikov
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
@GriseoCattus
@Chickendude
@MABUR
You might want to see this.
@AWESOMENESS360
you know what, you got a point.
@Amirabadi
why sorry about it? Besides it's published already
@DragoransEscarti
Then try to overcome them. I know it sounds easier than what it actually is, but try your best, and maybe you'll succeed!
I mean, everything can't go smooth sailing. And that rough seas you go through needs to be learned by yourself. Keep up the good work.
@FeatherWing
Oh wait I definitely said that wrong
What I meant to say was usually
@GriseoCattus
cool
Use fuselages. They're very cool.
@GorillaGuerrilla
It's not necesarrily hacking, since you can't really do that in SP.
You get a chance to edit your posted aircraft.
voting over, making the F-5E now.
@GorillaGuerrilla
when did I say I hate thrust vectoring?
I said it's bullshit because I love it so much. yes I know that's not how you use the word bullshit, but I just love putting bullshit after thrust vectoring or smth
Also please. Space out your sentences next time, because this message is too big.
Well, I mean, if you're using just one engine, then I suggest you change that. Get the BFE-150 and a low powered jet engine. First off, you want to disconnect the BFE-150, to measure the low powered engine's thrust to weight, while recalibrating it to whatever number you'd like. These numbers can be found in the info menu.
Then, you proceed to attach the BFE-150 again (please make the mass 0, and the collision to false), and then tune up or down the engine's power. After that, put "Throttle>0.9" on the BFE-150, and finally, position them in the same place.
I myself don't search any G-limiters, instead I use the input "Activate8 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch" on a rotator.
@Chickendude
нет. If I say below 2000, it has to be below 2000.
@Chickendude
да, why not?
Do you wish to see more of these simple styled creations? If yes, let me know!
@MABUR
nanti gk pada paham, mending pake inggris ae lah
@MABUR
да, salam kenal
nvm, I thought it was 100 parts. Oh well, still gonna post it anyway.
@MABUR
same stuff with how you put images.
I'm in, starting today and finishing it today.
@Bobyo
Oh well, then just ignore em.
@Bobyo
Can't you block him in your group chat?
I mean, doesn't every like 11 year old toxic kid does this shit? I don't know anything about steam, but can't you like, block that kid?
It was annoying. Please do not ever do this again.
Is this some kind of troll or is this his siblings typing on his account that doesn't know shit about the game?
@AWESOMENESS360
lmfao
please no, everyone would be crushed
and also I can't give the spotlight presents after like a year or smth if he won lmfao
@PantheraShojii
it looks too much like a canard, I'm sorry.
Besides, nobody really puts guns on leading edge root extensions. If you wanna count the Blended wing fuselage as root extensions, you really need to check again.
what's up with people putting guns in canards? it's cursed as hell.
In short, TVC actually reduces your "Performance" points. Because it's boosted by some technology bullshittery.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
Like I said, no need for a TVC. If it performs very well, then it might get a good point. And, if it is able to pull off such maneuvers without a thrust vectoring, it might receive a high point. Because that's amazing.