I'm aware that this is opinion-based, possibly troll statements, but these wings are genuinely prettier.
Granted, they take more parts and they require careful positioning, but it's not noobish or bad.
I myself do not use these types of wings, because I'm trying to reserve parts.
Do what you want, your style, your wing.
I am wasting my time trying to type this comment.
Trying to be original while simultaneously trying to replicate something is almost, like 97% impossible. When making a replica, I don't suggest that you try to be original, because someone, and someway will do it first. If you want to be original, put a feature that's exclusive to your aircraft and not replicate an aircraft design. I'm sorry but, It's kind of dumb to think "I want to replicate this to be original".
If you want to be more original, just make a fictional one, why not? This is SimplePlanes, where the impossible could be possible. Put your creativity into it.
@ElevatorEnthusiast747
I don't understand.
Okay, let me translate this a little bit:
So what you're saying is: "it works, but it faces the opposite direction of what I want it to face"?
@xNotDumb
wdym? I put "ZeroWithSlashedO" because I can't use "ø" for a name
also if this is a joke, I'm sorry, your joke is confusing enough to be recognized
Hmm... I guess set LandingGear to the door bay rotator's input, then put "max" at 0, and the "min" at -1. If the direction is reversed, just invert the rotator. Not by rotating the rotator, but by inverting the input of the rotator. Though rotating the rotator also works I guess.
I'm not blaming you for posting a successor to my F-16, it's just that... Description needs to change... And also do keep in mind I am a minor, and still pretty much a dumb 14 year old who has no idea of how the world works around him.
@CookieFlightSystems
Try giving a space after the quotation marks behind "Dist" and "Rel"
Like, "Target Speed Rel:" rate(TargetDistance);000000"m/s", if that doesn't work, try putting "()" in the codes
like (rate(TargetDistance);000000)"m/s"
@CookieFlightSystems
Wait...
Have you selected a target during testing to see if it works?
If the input is "false", then it's not going to show anything. I suggest adding "a" in the "false" statement to see if the code really works or no.
Alright... I kinda have to adress this, but you can't play PS2 games on a PSP emulator...
And also, if you have money just go buy a PSP and a game to play with it. It's much easier to play in it, trust me.
If I put more, it would ruin the launch. Do you want to see a Viper with 2 flares coming out of the same side? I do not.
There is 3 Countermeasure boxes in the real viper because you can't simply cram 60+ flares onto one box. Meanwhile in SP, you can just edit the amount of flares that exists in one box and have any amount that you like.
mw vibes intensify
22.7gb still sounds like alot to me
@OperatorLeaf
Answer: Yeah, it does that. Don't blame me, blame SP physics.
Elaborate, what do you mean "not working", hmm?
I'm aware that this is opinion-based, possibly troll statements, but these wings are genuinely prettier.
Granted, they take more parts and they require careful positioning, but it's not noobish or bad.
I myself do not use these types of wings, because I'm trying to reserve parts.
Do what you want, your style, your wing.
I am wasting my time trying to type this comment.
ok, cool
but I just wanted to warn you that anything regarding politics is not allowed in this site so please stay away from politics when you're here
ooh FA designation
@GriseoCattus
eh no worries
gl on the su35, pls make one for more potato phone players :)
@GriseoCattus
don't blame me, why didn't you think of it >:(
@GriseoCattus
I mean you could do it on the customizable viper
beri kul
though I wish it had a different loadout than the base one.
@Oxen
Anyhow, that looks good.
@Oxen
That is way better than what i could do.
@Oxen
panellinggggggggg is pain
but panelling is pretty much the only way to it. I'm sorry, there's no easier way.
For cockpits, I guess the only logical cockpit for a 5th generation is a glass cockpit.
For wings, Idk tbh. I guess just look at references?
Trying to be original while simultaneously trying to replicate something is almost, like 97% impossible. When making a replica, I don't suggest that you try to be original, because someone, and someway will do it first. If you want to be original, put a feature that's exclusive to your aircraft and not replicate an aircraft design. I'm sorry but, It's kind of dumb to think "I want to replicate this to be original".
If you want to be more original, just make a fictional one, why not? This is SimplePlanes, where the impossible could be possible. Put your creativity into it.
@xNotDumb
Why would I?
Besides, I'm not a ship guy.
Cool, but why tag?
@xNotDumb
Again, wdym?
@ElevatorEnthusiast747
I don't understand.
Okay, let me translate this a little bit:
So what you're saying is: "it works, but it faces the opposite direction of what I want it to face"?
@SoupTime9957
Well... I did say "one of the first, if not the first", so yeah.
@xNotDumb
wdym? I put "ZeroWithSlashedO" because I can't use "ø" for a name
also if this is a joke, I'm sorry, your joke is confusing enough to be recognized
@ThatBanana
You can edit your post in the right side of the download counter.
Hmm... I guess set LandingGear to the door bay rotator's input, then put "max" at 0, and the "min" at -1. If the direction is reversed, just invert the rotator. Not by rotating the rotator, but by inverting the input of the rotator. Though rotating the rotator also works I guess.
@ThatBanana
Oh, so you're not seeing any problems at all, huh? Not even the emojis or the way you talk in the description, huh?
camo
also for the question:
do one the same as mine :)
I'm not blaming you for posting a successor to my F-16, it's just that... Description needs to change... And also do keep in mind I am a minor, and still pretty much a dumb 14 year old who has no idea of how the world works around him.
@Xx24reminder
yes, very useful
very very much useful if you decided to pay attention and use hollow fuselages
@Chickendude
ty
sheeeeeeeeeeesh
@SELWYN101
Look at pinned comment.
@ThatBanana
Well... I guess I'll do something about that in the future.
hmmm
hmmmmmmmmmmmm
@Xx24reminder
I swear to fucking god, don't use the normal fuselage goddamit
just fuckin'
I want to scream in agony
@OperatorLeaf
Denied.
@DwiAngkasaAeronautics
njir magician ampun banh
also, platinum bentar lagi, ganbare~
@CookieFlightSystems
Try giving a space after the quotation marks behind "Dist" and "Rel"
Like, "Target Speed Rel:" rate(TargetDistance);000000"m/s", if that doesn't work, try putting "()" in the codes
like (rate(TargetDistance);000000)"m/s"
Hmm...
Landing on the carrier USN Style?
or landing in USS Tiny with a VTOL?
Or even dogfighting content?
@Xx24reminder
yeah that's what fuselage cutting is
@CookieFlightSystems
Wait...
Have you selected a target during testing to see if it works?
If the input is "false", then it's not going to show anything. I suggest adding "a" in the "false" statement to see if the code really works or no.
@CookieFlightSystems
Dunno. Have to try that out.
stol capable
Alright... I kinda have to adress this, but you can't play PS2 games on a PSP emulator...
And also, if you have money just go buy a PSP and a game to play with it. It's much easier to play in it, trust me.
@Wolfgang8261YT
I'll do that later.
And by later, I mean not in like 6 months.
@Xx24reminder
yes
@beenz
I'm not the best at making cockpits. And I can't handle many parts.
@BombBoi1822
Look before you comment.
@Quichenic
@Mekomara
Sure, but then again you can just get rid of all the parts. Or is that too tedious for you?
@ReinMcDeer
That doesn't sound too bad. And I still have one AG to spare, so that's cool.
hehehehehaw
@FalcoOne
Sorry, I will not add custom wings in the future. I don't like doing custom wings tbh.
also go ahead and steal the hud, who cares that you did? Besides it's a really simple edit