you're not wrong
sp drag is extremely overestimated, I found this out myself when I was switching to a different engine power method.
I think this is because when you make a pure non xml edited aircraft, they tend to be very light, and their engines tend to be very overpowered, so naturally they have a huge TWR, and so the drag is supposed to be huge to compensate for the overexaggerated TWR.
Idk, my theory might be wrong
@TheNewSPplayer
no, they function like that so the aircraft stabilizes along with angle of attack
the canards try to be level with the angle of attack, so itself is almost always at 0° aoa
you dropped out of midschool since 14? holy shit that must've been hard for ya
can't say the same cause I'm born in a pretty capable family for our neighborhood
anyway, here's a cool motivator or smth:
Keep movin' forward, and regain everything you've lost. Because you deserve it more than anybody. Good luck, soldier!
sorry if I sound ingenuine, it runs in my blood xd
@TheCommentaryGuy
I'm not asking in general, I'm asking for whether someone has made a Part Efficient Aircraft F-14.
I would be stupid to think that there never was an F-14 on the site
to keep it short:
make it comfortable to play in vr.
controls shouldn't be too far from the camera, and the cockpit should be relative to the aircraft's size.
Idk if they're still handing out the curated status, but, that's the gist of it.
I wouldn't recommend it tbh
everyone makes mistakes, and not alot of people get as much upvotes as the higher skills
which is why you build on experience, not on popularity
try to learn from mistakes, take critiscism as a building material, not a boulder.
how to get platinum:
step 1:
don't.
no but seriously just, why chase it?
just get good and they'll naturally come to you, nobody's perfect since the start.
now I do understand your opinion and I do understand why you do have it
but sir this is a site for an airplane game, personal opinions that are straight up controversial that's also NOT about airplanes on this game is strictly looked down upon so very kindly please remove your post.
also people need to keep their personal hatred to themselves more, I don't understand why you feel the need to shout out about it in a plane forum.
@GeneralCorpInc
yeah, sup?
general bynamics.
yooo isn't this @VeroViper's?
bro at the very least give him credits
@NavalGunnery
you can get around it, but I'm just more concerned about whether I should really post how or not.
@Graingy
believe it or not, it's still.underpowered compared to the F119, which is the F-22's engines.
@Nerfaddict
I haven't extensively tested it, since I only really tested my previous device limit, around 800 parts
suffice to say, it runs very well.
you're not wrong
sp drag is extremely overestimated, I found this out myself when I was switching to a different engine power method.
I think this is because when you make a pure non xml edited aircraft, they tend to be very light, and their engines tend to be very overpowered, so naturally they have a huge TWR, and so the drag is supposed to be huge to compensate for the overexaggerated TWR.
Idk, my theory might be wrong
short answer, yes.
tis' aight. better to save on your health than to risk it
@TheNewSPplayer
no, they function like that so the aircraft stabilizes along with angle of attack
the canards try to be level with the angle of attack, so itself is almost always at 0° aoa
you dropped out of midschool since 14? holy shit that must've been hard for ya
can't say the same cause I'm born in a pretty capable family for our neighborhood
anyway, here's a cool motivator or smth:
Keep movin' forward, and regain everything you've lost. Because you deserve it more than anybody. Good luck, soldier!
sorry if I sound ingenuine, it runs in my blood xd
@TheCommentaryGuy
sorry I'm not into any jokes today
@OrangeConnor2
maybe read the title more carefully again?
@TheCommentaryGuy
I'm not asking in general, I'm asking for whether someone has made a Part Efficient Aircraft F-14.
I would be stupid to think that there never was an F-14 on the site
poster child of resing
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
a heads up, I'm taking the D
to keep it short:
make it comfortable to play in vr.
controls shouldn't be too far from the camera, and the cockpit should be relative to the aircraft's size.
Idk if they're still handing out the curated status, but, that's the gist of it.
@TsukasaYuzaki
sure, as long as you credit me.
I wouldn't recommend it tbh
everyone makes mistakes, and not alot of people get as much upvotes as the higher skills
which is why you build on experience, not on popularity
try to learn from mistakes, take critiscism as a building material, not a boulder.
@MTDP
sure
don't tag me, but do please credit me, leaving auto-credit works.
@RealMicroZackSP
no.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
self explanatory intakes that form an S shaped duct to the engine
comment below explains it.
you can use something called PAT, which essentially is just stacking 2 cut fuselages atop of one another.
@ACUTEPIGEON
if you're talking about my social media accounts, you can check my profile for it
@L3FT2R1GHT
@rorrE
@MAPA
@TheMouse
@BadahhMuscleCar001
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@Adventurehill1
@SuperSuperTheSylph
bruh
how to get platinum:
step 1:
don't.
no but seriously just, why chase it?
just get good and they'll naturally come to you, nobody's perfect since the start.
now I do understand your opinion and I do understand why you do have it
but sir this is a site for an airplane game, personal opinions that are straight up controversial that's also NOT about airplanes on this game is strictly looked down upon so very kindly please remove your post.
also people need to keep their personal hatred to themselves more, I don't understand why you feel the need to shout out about it in a plane forum.
@ReinMcDeer
interesting
I can imagine that takes a bit more performance cost though
genuinely curious whether you used two fuselages for the nose
cause I'm also making a tomcat
that is a lot of glass parts
@Mahoots
again, as long as you credit
@Mahoots
as long as you credit.
なんで？
好きじゃなの、「Fried Chicken Cheese Chips」?
@V
yknow what's crazy? half of them probably watches cocomelon on a daily basi-
jk
I had never knew this was a thing, but, it made sense Ig
@LoganTheGameDev
damn it
say goodbye
step 4:
...steal an experimental weapon?
@Monarchii
question
does a structural panel with control surface count as a wing part? or no?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
yyyyyeaaaahhhh
I got stumped because of several projects.
@PlaneFlightX
probably, I've been able to use imgbb in the past though so either it's a blockage in my general area, or it's chrome being chrome.
@PlaneFlightX
so it's just my problem, huh?
I think it might just be chrome doing chrome things.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
that means, it doesn't stop me from trying to make an F-4.
fucking rubberband
@ShinyGemsBro
damn
@ShinyGemsBro
do you know how to replicate it at least
@ShinyGemsBro
the tail text