@SuperSuperTheSylph
the F110 is stronger, though only very slightly
also the specific thrust you put on the desc is the thrust output of an F100-PW-229 so yeag
just an fyi, the Block 15 above has a taper on their wings, they don't cut off like that.
oh and, is this the Blk70 or Blk72? they're both different because they have different engines
the 70 has the F110-GE-129, while the 72 has the F100-PW-229.
I hope you did actually pay attention to the engine details and uprate the engine because the F-16A uses the F100-PW-200 (I haven't tried it)
nvm I'm just blind
I can't unsee the fact that it is a m2k
just l o n g and intake is square
yeah this is the same exact comment I made on the teaser post xd
welcome back btw
go to xml, add the property bulletScale in the Gun section and put in the value 0,0,0
if you still wanna be able to see just a little bit, putting 0.1,0.1,0.1 works
The missile might know where it is, and know where it isn't. But in some cases, the missile might not know where it is or where it isn't. When the guidance subsystem has acquired the position of where the missile is, and where it isn't, the missile might be able to know where it should be through mathematical computation. In cases where the missile knows where it isn't and where it is, it should be able to reach it's position that it should be by comparing where it is to where it isn't. But in some cases, these missiles might not know where they should be.
In the case when a missile knows where it should be, and begins to generate corrective commands to arrive in the position where it should be, the pilot could deploy several methods to confuse the missile from knowing where it is and where it isn't. When the position where it should be is blocked by a cloud of systems, or by an obstacle in it's path, the missile loses sight on where it isn't, and thus loses a reason to arrive at the point where it should be. Which is called defeating a missile.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
well, yeah, I am aware chii did actually make a MiG-29, but as far as I remember, he didn't actually put a MiG-29 in the official list so I plan to make one myself.
and also the 104 cause I saw Falcon's Fighter Tales about it this morning and I decided I wanted to make it
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
I am the jet man.
I've been a replicator for 4 years lmao, don't be surprised when I cook up something actually good in just 3 hours xd
@LunarEclipseSP
I've only had made 5
And also, I'll only say it here but I plan on updating my PEAs, so if you wanna download them, do now before you want to make a comparison
I do have to be honest, it is lackluster in terms of replication. It looks nowhere like a Su-30SM, and it breaks one of the rules of a PEA aircraft, being only equipped with 7 wing parts.
I would say good job because you tried, but with a heavy heart, I would have to say I do not like this.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
hey, not that I'm saying I have no interest in your builds but
seriously please stop tagging me on every build that you make, it annoys me
since when...
+1huh.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1ooh, interesting, thanks for the notif!
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1the F110 is stronger, though only very slightly
also the specific thrust you put on the desc is the thrust output of an F100-PW-229 so yeag
just an fyi, the Block 15 above has a taper on their wings, they don't cut off like that.
+1oh and, is this the Blk70 or Blk72? they're both different because they have different engines
the 70 has the F110-GE-129, while the 72 has the F100-PW-229.
I hope you did actually pay attention to the engine details and uprate the engine because the F-16A uses the F100-PW-200 (I haven't tried it)
nvm I'm just blind
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yeah, go on ahead
as long as you credit it
@ReinMcDeer
+1ahh figured, there's really no way to simplify that without it looking a little too odd Ig
I can't unsee the fact that it is a m2k
+1just l o n g and intake is square
yeah this is the same exact comment I made on the teaser post xd
welcome back btw
there's a high likelihood that multiple people out there is exactly as old as your account
+1ever thought of that before? you probably have. Idk
go to xml, add the property
+1bulletScalein theGunsection and put in the value0,0,0if you still wanna be able to see just a little bit, putting
0.1,0.1,0.1worksbobmcat
+1@IQinventory
+1I'm pretty sure it does
@SkyJayTheFirst
+1Idk
if this is a battle of pride I'm not gonna get in the ring
@MrOofington
+1that's called stealing so yes I do mind
@LunarEclipseSP
+1tfx...
DON'T CALL HER THA-
@SPAirForce
+1@Noob101
+1@PrussianAirlines
@MAPA
+1@Rb2h
@TheMouse
@Speedhunter
+1@DatFiat126Fan19
@Foxhound26
@Monarchii
+1ah damn.
am sped
+1this was different than I imagined.
+1(I made the su27 already)
you could've done better with mine, tbh
+1also vero's was actually kinda solid.
I mean glock's a glock.
+1The missile might know where it is, and know where it isn't. But in some cases, the missile might not know where it is or where it isn't. When the guidance subsystem has acquired the position of where the missile is, and where it isn't, the missile might be able to know where it should be through mathematical computation. In cases where the missile knows where it isn't and where it is, it should be able to reach it's position that it should be by comparing where it is to where it isn't. But in some cases, these missiles might not know where they should be.
In the case when a missile knows where it should be, and begins to generate corrective commands to arrive in the position where it should be, the pilot could deploy several methods to confuse the missile from knowing where it is and where it isn't. When the position where it should be is blocked by a cloud of systems, or by an obstacle in it's path, the missile loses sight on where it isn't, and thus loses a reason to arrive at the point where it should be. Which is called defeating a missile.
+1there is a reason I'm trying to update the PEAs.
+1you'll see.
@Monarchii
+1I have nothing to say tbh, just
damn.
@Emma159
+1ty :)
@Emma159 @Apollo018362
+1Can you two please remove your upvotes? I want this thing to be at 31 upvotes permanent
muh gahd
+1finally an aircraft I can bully with the f22 :>>>>
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1just noticed?
@ReinMcDeer
+1it was yours
I merely copied it :>
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1well, yeah, I am aware chii did actually make a MiG-29, but as far as I remember, he didn't actually put a MiG-29 in the official list so I plan to make one myself.
and also the 104 cause I saw Falcon's Fighter Tales about it this morning and I decided I wanted to make it
oh you're taking the F/A-18E?
+1well then, I guess I'll make the legacy.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1I am the jet man.
I've been a replicator for 4 years lmao, don't be surprised when I cook up something actually good in just 3 hours xd
is that latios
+1@AirPhilippinesFlight541
+1can you please stop bothering him? 7 months ago he already made this decision, so suck it up.
@AirPhilippinesFlight541
+1looks like someone didn't read.
I honestly thought you were talking about SP AI. Which, yeah, sounded impossible.
+1Good Luck mates! Hope ya'll are going to have a blast developing SP2 as much as we'll be going to have once we got our grubby little hands on it!
+1@LunarEclipseSP
+1I've only had made 5
And also, I'll only say it here but I plan on updating my PEAs, so if you wanna download them, do now before you want to make a comparison
I am now tempted to make a mig31.
+1@Monarchii
+1that somehow makes me so happy
I do have to be honest, it is lackluster in terms of replication. It looks nowhere like a Su-30SM, and it breaks one of the rules of a PEA aircraft, being only equipped with 7 wing parts.
+1I would say good job because you tried, but with a heavy heart, I would have to say I do not like this.
goofiest attempt at a stealth fighter I've ever seen
+1I like it.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1hey, not that I'm saying I have no interest in your builds but
seriously please stop tagging me on every build that you make, it annoys me
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1I don't think I will, no.
take that F-22 off your list, I'll make em myself.
+1"democracy" lmao
+1hot damn
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1I did say to you, I was making the f16
also, I only made the blk 10 anyway so you can still make the blk 50 if you want