@PantheraShojii
it looks too much like a canard, I'm sorry.
Besides, nobody really puts guns on leading edge root extensions. If you wanna count the Blended wing fuselage as root extensions, you really need to check again.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
Like I said, no need for a TVC. If it performs very well, then it might get a good point. And, if it is able to pull off such maneuvers without a thrust vectoring, it might receive a high point. Because that's amazing.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
Also, need a tip?
Make your MiG-29 or F/A-18E actually supermaneuverable, and reduce the engine power. And also pick off some little unnecessary details like livery, and make it have below 2000pc. Done. No Thrust Vectoring bullshit. Hell, the F/A-18E is below 2000pc. You can enter with it by changing some stuff, and boom. You're in.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
for example?
I added "no variable wing sweep" because realistically speaking, swing wings can't stand high Gs that appeared out of nowhere.
I added "below 1.4 thrust to weight" because the creations in SP tends to have a shit ton of t/w, and I generally don't like those. Yeah sure, there's sense of speed which is amazing, but it kind of just eliminated all the strategies I could do with said aircraft.
@CarrotSlicingCat
there's an exhaustColorOverridePrimary expression. Put a color code in the value. To get color codes, just look up "hex color picker" on google.
I've tried with hooks, it simply does not work. Dunno about chutes though. Probably the same, since they use groups instead of actual inputs. And these "custom AGs" are not actually Activation Groups. It's just a custom input.
Still one more issue.
Thrust to weight.
Due to the huge amount lf 19.59 T/W ratio, I cannot accept this one either.
Please read the rules more carefully.
Acceleration, you quite simply tune down the engine's power, but I dunno about the decelration. The gliding thing doesn't work probably because it doesn't have enough lift
And to make it even cooler, you can put //maincamera>camera.set_fieldofview 30. 30 being the FoV that you set, you can set it to any FoV you want. I recommend 30, since it kind of works the best. Base value is 60.
It is decided then.
A, and C was the most voted option, so I'll do that.
And also...
@ReinMcDeer, your wish will be granted. Although this does mean I'm not going to be publishing it today. Hopefully after I finished my school, I can straight up work on it.
@Bobyo
Can't you block him in your group chat?
I mean, doesn't every like 11 year old toxic kid does this shit? I don't know anything about steam, but can't you like, block that kid?
It was annoying. Please do not ever do this again.
Is this some kind of troll or is this his siblings typing on his account that doesn't know shit about the game?
@CarrotSlicingCat
+1what?
What do you mean?
@AWESOMENESS360
lmfao
please no, everyone would be crushed
and also I can't give the spotlight presents after like a year or smth if he won lmfao
what?
+1How did you not know this? It's a basic thing in SP
@PantheraShojii
it looks too much like a canard, I'm sorry.
Besides, nobody really puts guns on leading edge root extensions. If you wanna count the Blended wing fuselage as root extensions, you really need to check again.
what's up with people putting guns in canards? it's cursed as hell.
In short, TVC actually reduces your "Performance" points. Because it's boosted by some technology bullshittery.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
Like I said, no need for a TVC. If it performs very well, then it might get a good point. And, if it is able to pull off such maneuvers without a thrust vectoring, it might receive a high point. Because that's amazing.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
Also, need a tip?
Make your MiG-29 or F/A-18E actually supermaneuverable, and reduce the engine power. And also pick off some little unnecessary details like livery, and make it have below 2000pc. Done. No Thrust Vectoring bullshit. Hell, the F/A-18E is below 2000pc. You can enter with it by changing some stuff, and boom. You're in.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
for example?
I added "no variable wing sweep" because realistically speaking, swing wings can't stand high Gs that appeared out of nowhere.
I added "below 1.4 thrust to weight" because the creations in SP tends to have a shit ton of t/w, and I generally don't like those. Yeah sure, there's sense of speed which is amazing, but it kind of just eliminated all the strategies I could do with said aircraft.
Idfk, why ask when the 1.3 beta hasn't even been announced?
+1@CarrotSlicingCat
there's an exhaustColorOverridePrimary expression. Put a color code in the value. To get color codes, just look up "hex color picker" on google.
@idontknow8b
+1Thanks. I'm not sure if I can reach gold that fast though... Building these kinda things took a long time.
Overload, Engine (EngineThrustPort in VTOL nozzles), exhaustColorOverridePrimary.
To get the color you wanted, just type "hex color picker" on google.
Did you check if the canards have wingPhysicsEnabled true?
+2I've tried with hooks, it simply does not work. Dunno about chutes though. Probably the same, since they use groups instead of actual inputs. And these "custom AGs" are not actually Activation Groups. It's just a custom input.
+2@WorstPlaneIEverMake
oof.
Still one more issue.
+2Thrust to weight.
Due to the huge amount lf 19.59 T/W ratio, I cannot accept this one either.
Please read the rules more carefully.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
That is why you don't use custom built engines, it's a pretty bad idea.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
Above 1000pc is okay, but not above 2000pc.
@GriseoCattus
Thanks.
Oof!
+1Sorry to dissapoint you, but this aircraft exceeded the maximum performance cost requirement.
Please post a below 2000 performance cost version!
Side note:
Recommended to build your aircraft on low physics. My phone doesn't like high physics with 1000 performance cost.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
what?
Oh you mean, are fictional planes allowed?
Why yes! Yes of course! As long as it can do PSM, that is.
@ReinMcDeer
Copy that, m8!
Personally, I think it's a cone.
+1:O
+2Right after my Typhoon, yes!
I'd like a tag when finished, please. Just in case I missed my Jetstream. This will be cool.
@Almostbutnotquite
Yay!
Linky link
@Karmen @Allahuakbar
@Bryan5 @Haytham115 @idontknow8b
+3Thank you all. Oh and I forgot.
Well, it must be a successor, but can I enter this with my just released Eurofighter Typhoon?
+1@AirCrashInvestigationFLR
da.
Acceleration, you quite simply tune down the engine's power, but I dunno about the decelration. The gliding thing doesn't work probably because it doesn't have enough lift
@Jeraldairlines23465
Well, better get good.
@Jeraldairlines23465,
If I wanted to enjoy it myself, I'd just have downloaded the original.
And don't try to distract me with those wings.
kinda
@Chickendude
Oh, it's on rockets?
@CarrotSlicingCat
Attack Helicopter
And to make it even cooler, you can put //maincamera>camera.set_fieldofview 30. 30 being the FoV that you set, you can set it to any FoV you want. I recommend 30, since it kind of works the best. Base value is 60.
+1AH, maybe?
No, not really.
It isn't really cheating if it's in the game as a base part, and not a mod
Besides, Gyroscopes make your life alot easier.
It is decided then.
A, and C was the most voted option, so I'll do that.
And also...
@ReinMcDeer, your wish will be granted. Although this does mean I'm not going to be publishing it today. Hopefully after I finished my school, I can straight up work on it.
@SixteenCelsius
can't say.
Well for one:
+10It's way too off topic.
And two:
It was cringe as hell boi
Have you even read the rules?
Why?
+1Why are people upvoting this again?
Yeah, I'm sure it isn't other guy's work with an effortless addition of a hook, I'm sure
basically Nosferatu, but censored due to copyright laws by a certain Estovakian arms industry?