@HuskyDynamics01
I have tried that. It failed.
Problem #1:
This is a floppy rotator. Not a rotator with speed set to anything above 0.
@DeveloperKorzalerke
Problem #2:
I don't use any inputs.
Might try it out again, see if it works. I'll inform you two after the testing.
The explosions in this game is just... Weird. Sometimes one part explodes and just damages the nearby part sometimes leaving a big gap, and the other times it just blows you into pieces, no questions.
The missile itself needs alot of rework to make it at least semi-realistic. Like:
Finite fuel. There's already an option for that, but the missile just dies after fuel goes out.
proxy as standard option.
Active Radar Guided needs to go to "pitbull" in order to track it's target by it's own. Meaning it acts as a semi-active before a certain range, and goes active when it reaches a certain range.
Faster lock time.
Able to collect data of a Missile's position. For RWRs and stuff. Just generally increase SA.
I feel like there's more to converting mods into a feature, maybe like optimizing for it to be compatible to low end devices. I mean, if they just ctrl+c and ctrl+v the codes in Tracks 2, there's probably going to be complaints from potato tank builders. I personally do agree with tracks 2 being added to the game, not because I'd like to make a tank somewhere in the future, but just because it adds simplicity, no more high count track bs. But then again there's a chance that the part costed alot of performance cost.
I'm not a tank builder myself, I just think that tank tracks would be cool if they added it. Or... Remake the tutorials instead, the tutorials in this game already feels obsolete. They contain alot of the old game mechanics but not the new game mechanics. Meaning that new players need to figure out how these things work.
ohhhhh you mean trying to drag the cursor but the one move instead was the camera?
yeah that's a thing, it seems to be caused by playing for a pretty long time and camera zoom on the designer
they do that, dunno why. I usually turn air traffic off, and I'll spawn an aircraft if I want to do something to it.
I don't put air traffic at all due to me not being able to support multiple aircraft in the area if I have a "high" performance cost build.
dunno why, but I feel like the AI needs to have a little bit more control. It doesn't feel fun fighting against an AI, tbh.
I once made a challenge and I made the rules a bit too strict. This one is definitely a worse case than mine.
rule complaints:
1. You want high quality builds or nah? If yea, that 70 part requirement is not gonna get you anywhere. Even my simple MiG-29 is at a staggering 95 parts. Hell, my actual good simple build, F-14B AND Su-33 is at 128 (F-14) and 181 (Su-33) parts. Too strict. Lag issues? Play at low physics.
2. Not everyone knows how to make that, you know. Too strict.
3. I'm assuming "good armor" means it can withstand a blast attack, which is impossible with such low parts. Extremely, impossibly strict.
4. How do you even make shields that functions like an actual shield? Impossible to do.
5. Not possible. If a part collided with another part, either both will be utterly destroyed and blow you with your enemies up, or anticlimactically damage your craft with the enemy craft. Impossible to do.
6. No complaints about rule 6.
7. Again, not everyone knows how to do that. Too strict.
8. While this is plausible, it's very hard to pull off. Not saying it's impossible, but it ain't easy in any way.
Deadline's too short. 23rd of April is long enough? Ha! Think again! One week ain't enough my dude. An acceptable challenge deadline is approximately 3+ weeks from the day it was started. A good deadline time is around a month after the challenge started.
From what I've heard, Ukrainian-Russian conflict is ended in Ukrainian victory. Anyhow, it's best to not talk about the conflict.
not to be rude or anything, but who is this "chubby"?
also, I would not recommend to put "F" in the chat for something like this, it just sounds disrespectful.
I'm going to be brutally honest, but nobody really cares about 300 points. I don't think I'm the only one who thinks: "Oh, this user got 1000 points and he's celebrating it. Cool, Ig, Idrc."
But then when a certain user reaches 5000 points, people would congratulate him.
Anyway, congratulations. You still have a long way to go. Good luck.
no.
+5Yeeeahhhh, never click the undo multiple times in short durations or that happens. And also try to save your craft very often.
more often than not, you kinda have to figure it out yourselves
because in this website, there are either:
though, this might help, and this
+4no?
+1nice
now put slamers in that bad boy
@DeveloperKorzalerke
Well... Landing gear.
@DeveloperKorzalerke
I just did. I said I'll try it again. Not right now though, I'm a bit busy.
@HuskyDynamics01
I have tried that. It failed.
Problem #1:
This is a floppy rotator. Not a rotator with speed set to anything above 0.
@DeveloperKorzalerke
Problem #2:
I don't use any inputs.
Might try it out again, see if it works. I'll inform you two after the testing.
That's all?
+2...Aight. I'm in.
More like texture issues, tbh. Don't ask us, it's kinda just unchangeable. Unless you are a texturer, then you can.
Muslims don't drink vodka, блять.
+3haha, 33rd Page.
@ReinMcDeer
eurofighter better imo
The explosions in this game is just... Weird. Sometimes one part explodes and just damages the nearby part sometimes leaving a big gap, and the other times it just blows you into pieces, no questions.
The missile itself needs alot of rework to make it at least semi-realistic. Like:
That's all, I guess.
+2I feel like there's more to converting mods into a feature, maybe like optimizing for it to be compatible to low end devices. I mean, if they just ctrl+c and ctrl+v the codes in Tracks 2, there's probably going to be complaints from potato tank builders. I personally do agree with tracks 2 being added to the game, not because I'd like to make a tank somewhere in the future, but just because it adds simplicity, no more high count track bs. But then again there's a chance that the part costed alot of performance cost.
+1I'm not a tank builder myself, I just think that tank tracks would be cool if they added it. Or... Remake the tutorials instead, the tutorials in this game already feels obsolete. They contain alot of the old game mechanics but not the new game mechanics. Meaning that new players need to figure out how these things work.
Sheeeeeesh, that missile loader bussin
+1yep and ngl I also want sr2
+4@SCPCalebkid
Planned even before the creation of the F-16.
nrn tho, I still wanna make some gen 4s
@SCPCalebkid
what is it?
ohhhhh you mean trying to drag the cursor but the one move instead was the camera?
yeah that's a thing, it seems to be caused by playing for a pretty long time and camera zoom on the designer
I know I've said it already but can you make the NF-15B?
the STOL/MTD to be exact, not the ACTIVE.
make an f15
+1the nf15b
a bit too big, I must say, and it's poking out of the wing too much.
+1they do that, dunno why. I usually turn air traffic off, and I'll spawn an aircraft if I want to do something to it.
+4I don't put air traffic at all due to me not being able to support multiple aircraft in the area if I have a "high" performance cost build.
dunno why, but I feel like the AI needs to have a little bit more control. It doesn't feel fun fighting against an AI, tbh.
aircraft reflections = off
this might be why
@SCPCalebkid
they obviously know it's a teaser.
I do not absolutely think so.
common mistake. I used to make my planes small too.
ok cool
ok cool
Bold of you to advertise this in a website about making airplanes.
water physics are broken somehow
I'm not a ship builder, but ask some ship builders for that
for example, Tsuchiisan, dude's a great builder.
I once made a challenge and I made the rules a bit too strict. This one is definitely a worse case than mine.
+2rule complaints:
1. You want high quality builds or nah? If yea, that 70 part requirement is not gonna get you anywhere. Even my simple MiG-29 is at a staggering 95 parts. Hell, my actual good simple build, F-14B AND Su-33 is at 128 (F-14) and 181 (Su-33) parts. Too strict. Lag issues? Play at low physics.
2. Not everyone knows how to make that, you know. Too strict.
3. I'm assuming "good armor" means it can withstand a blast attack, which is impossible with such low parts. Extremely, impossibly strict.
4. How do you even make shields that functions like an actual shield? Impossible to do.
5. Not possible. If a part collided with another part, either both will be utterly destroyed and blow you with your enemies up, or anticlimactically damage your craft with the enemy craft. Impossible to do.
6. No complaints about rule 6.
7. Again, not everyone knows how to do that. Too strict.
8. While this is plausible, it's very hard to pull off. Not saying it's impossible, but it ain't easy in any way.
Deadline's too short. 23rd of April is long enough? Ha! Think again! One week ain't enough my dude. An acceptable challenge deadline is approximately 3+ weeks from the day it was started. A good deadline time is around a month after the challenge started.
From what I've heard, Ukrainian-Russian conflict is ended in Ukrainian victory. Anyhow, it's best to not talk about the conflict.
did you put a missile?
if yes, then uhh... You need to change that.
I feel defeated.
usually right, but more often than not it's kind of random.
+1I'd switch from right to left, then to the right again sometimes.
@GeorgianSpecialAirforce
apparently I'm blind, thank you for clarifying that
eagle
+1not to be rude or anything, but who is this "chubby"?
also, I would not recommend to put "F" in the chat for something like this, it just sounds disrespectful.
beamng?
+1I'd be kind of interested for a beamng vid ngl
cool.
+1@SucyWitch
don't put them far from each other, that affects your maneuverability
@SucyWitch
I said check, if the separation is big, then that's the problem.
nice technique
+1one small issue
no cockpit
check your CoM and CoL separation.
@KONOJERRYDA
thank you :D
I was wondering where it went, I needed it
@Snargles
understandable have a good day.
wouldn't the MiG-31 be easier? I mean it's literally just a brick with wings.
floor(smooth(clamp01(LandingGear), 1/x))
x is delay in seconds
I'm going to be brutally honest, but nobody really cares about 300 points. I don't think I'm the only one who thinks: "Oh, this user got 1000 points and he's celebrating it. Cool, Ig, Idrc."
+3But then when a certain user reaches 5000 points, people would congratulate him.
Anyway, congratulations. You still have a long way to go. Good luck.