ohhhhh you mean trying to drag the cursor but the one move instead was the camera?
yeah that's a thing, it seems to be caused by playing for a pretty long time and camera zoom on the designer
they do that, dunno why. I usually turn air traffic off, and I'll spawn an aircraft if I want to do something to it.
I don't put air traffic at all due to me not being able to support multiple aircraft in the area if I have a "high" performance cost build.
dunno why, but I feel like the AI needs to have a little bit more control. It doesn't feel fun fighting against an AI, tbh.
I once made a challenge and I made the rules a bit too strict. This one is definitely a worse case than mine.
rule complaints:
1. You want high quality builds or nah? If yea, that 70 part requirement is not gonna get you anywhere. Even my simple MiG-29 is at a staggering 95 parts. Hell, my actual good simple build, F-14B AND Su-33 is at 128 (F-14) and 181 (Su-33) parts. Too strict. Lag issues? Play at low physics.
2. Not everyone knows how to make that, you know. Too strict.
3. I'm assuming "good armor" means it can withstand a blast attack, which is impossible with such low parts. Extremely, impossibly strict.
4. How do you even make shields that functions like an actual shield? Impossible to do.
5. Not possible. If a part collided with another part, either both will be utterly destroyed and blow you with your enemies up, or anticlimactically damage your craft with the enemy craft. Impossible to do.
6. No complaints about rule 6.
7. Again, not everyone knows how to do that. Too strict.
8. While this is plausible, it's very hard to pull off. Not saying it's impossible, but it ain't easy in any way.
Deadline's too short. 23rd of April is long enough? Ha! Think again! One week ain't enough my dude. An acceptable challenge deadline is approximately 3+ weeks from the day it was started. A good deadline time is around a month after the challenge started.
From what I've heard, Ukrainian-Russian conflict is ended in Ukrainian victory. Anyhow, it's best to not talk about the conflict.
not to be rude or anything, but who is this "chubby"?
also, I would not recommend to put "F" in the chat for something like this, it just sounds disrespectful.
I'm going to be brutally honest, but nobody really cares about 300 points. I don't think I'm the only one who thinks: "Oh, this user got 1000 points and he's celebrating it. Cool, Ig, Idrc."
But then when a certain user reaches 5000 points, people would congratulate him.
Anyway, congratulations. You still have a long way to go. Good luck.
@OrderlyHippo
Just a heads up, it's not really good... especially from the external view...
The best thing I can think of is make the whole plane out of glass, set opacity to 100, and disable the inside view. After that you can color the glass with what you want.
I may or may not participate in this... But then again...
Mmh...
Edit: I'm doing it.
Edit 2: Actually... Nevermind. My oldest plane was built 5 months ago... I wanted to do my Su-35BM again. But I guess nah.
Edit 3: Question, can I remake the default planes? The simple ones. Not the new ones.
What the hell happened to this comment section, it's filled with almost jokes.
Oh and, honestly, I'd vibe for SP2. I dunno, it feels like it's required at this point.
Yes. Fox 2s would also be nice. At this point, like Kangy said, weapons need a massive overhaul.
Hell yeah.
More thing I want to add:
HMCS. Please, I really want an HMCS that doesn't ruin my Flight Data.
Same idea as AeroBuddy's, wings just need a bit more detail.
Stealth fuselage. I swear to god it's impossible to make a stealth fuselage without putting width and height dimensions the same, or do a copius amounts of panelling just to get the shape right, and you can't even make a cockpit out of the simple stealth fuselage technique because you can't even do a correct fuselage cutting with it anymore.
Tones. Custom tones, more specifically. I wanna hear Bitchin Betty's complainin' about my piloting skills.
Airports feels too dead. Maybe add some car models to make it look better.
Better AI. AI have no grasp of energy management whatsoever, and due to the complete bs that is default planes, It's barely going to affect the speed of what the AI would be doing. Either they do so well that they'll literally rip you so fast or stay in the fight for too long until you run out of fuel, or they do so bad that they'll just dive into the water without a fight. And when they're on the ground, they will try to takeoff in anyway possible.
Ship. Parts. I don't know anything about ships, but having a catapult, arresting wire parts, engines, and more would be a nice present to ship builders.
Fix. The. Yaw. Physics. I don't care if it shakes my plane side to side after yawing, just please make it actually have an effect on our flight path.
Sheeeeeesh, that missile loader bussin
+1yep and ngl I also want sr2
+4@SCPCalebkid
Planned even before the creation of the F-16.
nrn tho, I still wanna make some gen 4s
@SCPCalebkid
what is it?
ohhhhh you mean trying to drag the cursor but the one move instead was the camera?
yeah that's a thing, it seems to be caused by playing for a pretty long time and camera zoom on the designer
I know I've said it already but can you make the NF-15B?
the STOL/MTD to be exact, not the ACTIVE.
make an f15
+1the nf15b
a bit too big, I must say, and it's poking out of the wing too much.
+1they do that, dunno why. I usually turn air traffic off, and I'll spawn an aircraft if I want to do something to it.
+4I don't put air traffic at all due to me not being able to support multiple aircraft in the area if I have a "high" performance cost build.
dunno why, but I feel like the AI needs to have a little bit more control. It doesn't feel fun fighting against an AI, tbh.
aircraft reflections = off
this might be why
@SCPCalebkid
they obviously know it's a teaser.
I do not absolutely think so.
common mistake. I used to make my planes small too.
ok cool
ok cool
Bold of you to advertise this in a website about making airplanes.
water physics are broken somehow
I'm not a ship builder, but ask some ship builders for that
for example, Tsuchiisan, dude's a great builder.
I once made a challenge and I made the rules a bit too strict. This one is definitely a worse case than mine.
+2rule complaints:
1. You want high quality builds or nah? If yea, that 70 part requirement is not gonna get you anywhere. Even my simple MiG-29 is at a staggering 95 parts. Hell, my actual good simple build, F-14B AND Su-33 is at 128 (F-14) and 181 (Su-33) parts. Too strict. Lag issues? Play at low physics.
2. Not everyone knows how to make that, you know. Too strict.
3. I'm assuming "good armor" means it can withstand a blast attack, which is impossible with such low parts. Extremely, impossibly strict.
4. How do you even make shields that functions like an actual shield? Impossible to do.
5. Not possible. If a part collided with another part, either both will be utterly destroyed and blow you with your enemies up, or anticlimactically damage your craft with the enemy craft. Impossible to do.
6. No complaints about rule 6.
7. Again, not everyone knows how to do that. Too strict.
8. While this is plausible, it's very hard to pull off. Not saying it's impossible, but it ain't easy in any way.
Deadline's too short. 23rd of April is long enough? Ha! Think again! One week ain't enough my dude. An acceptable challenge deadline is approximately 3+ weeks from the day it was started. A good deadline time is around a month after the challenge started.
From what I've heard, Ukrainian-Russian conflict is ended in Ukrainian victory. Anyhow, it's best to not talk about the conflict.
did you put a missile?
if yes, then uhh... You need to change that.
I feel defeated.
usually right, but more often than not it's kind of random.
+1I'd switch from right to left, then to the right again sometimes.
@GeorgianSpecialAirforce
apparently I'm blind, thank you for clarifying that
eagle
+1not to be rude or anything, but who is this "chubby"?
also, I would not recommend to put "F" in the chat for something like this, it just sounds disrespectful.
beamng?
+1I'd be kind of interested for a beamng vid ngl
cool.
+1@SucyWitch
don't put them far from each other, that affects your maneuverability
@SucyWitch
I said check, if the separation is big, then that's the problem.
nice technique
+1one small issue
no cockpit
check your CoM and CoL separation.
@KONOJERRYDA
thank you :D
I was wondering where it went, I needed it
@Snargles
understandable have a good day.
wouldn't the MiG-31 be easier? I mean it's literally just a brick with wings.
floor(smooth(clamp01(LandingGear), 1/x))
x is delay in seconds
I'm going to be brutally honest, but nobody really cares about 300 points. I don't think I'm the only one who thinks: "Oh, this user got 1000 points and he's celebrating it. Cool, Ig, Idrc."
+3But then when a certain user reaches 5000 points, people would congratulate him.
Anyway, congratulations. You still have a long way to go. Good luck.
number 7:
+3finally locked a target after like 7 seconds, but then loses the lock after 0.1 seconds because of flares and chaff bs
fr
@Beifenglenglong
+1no
look at desc
@Decembermin
I already broke my fast it's already Maghrib here in Indonesia
@Beifenglenglong
english please?
are you fasting rn?
+1@ReinMcDeer
+2Sam
@AlmostADev
friends.
@OrderlyHippo
+2Just a heads up, it's not really good... especially from the external view...
The best thing I can think of is make the whole plane out of glass, set opacity to 100, and disable the inside view. After that you can color the glass with what you want.
Oh wow
+5Honestly I dunno what to say, it's just impressive
I may or may not participate in this... But then again...
Mmh...
Edit: I'm doing it.
Edit 2: Actually... Nevermind. My oldest plane was built 5 months ago... I wanted to do my Su-35BM again. But I guess nah.
Edit 3: Question, can I remake the default planes? The simple ones. Not the new ones.
What the hell happened to this comment section, it's filled with almost jokes.
+2Oh and, honestly, I'd vibe for SP2. I dunno, it feels like it's required at this point.
because people want to, and they can, got a problem with that?
AYOOOOOOOO
congrats :)
I wish you the best at the training :)
- Yes.
- Yes. Fox 2s would also be nice. At this point, like Kangy said, weapons need a massive overhaul.
- Hell yeah.
- HMCS. Please, I really want an HMCS that doesn't ruin my Flight Data.
- Same idea as AeroBuddy's, wings just need a bit more detail.
- Stealth fuselage. I swear to god it's impossible to make a stealth fuselage without putting width and height dimensions the same, or do a copius amounts of panelling just to get the shape right, and you can't even make a cockpit out of the simple stealth fuselage technique because you can't even do a correct fuselage cutting with it anymore.
- Tones. Custom tones, more specifically. I wanna hear Bitchin Betty's complainin' about my piloting skills.
- Airports feels too dead. Maybe add some car models to make it look better.
- Better AI. AI have no grasp of energy management whatsoever, and due to the complete bs that is default planes, It's barely going to affect the speed of what the AI would be doing. Either they do so well that they'll literally rip you so fast or stay in the fight for too long until you run out of fuel, or they do so bad that they'll just dive into the water without a fight. And when they're on the ground, they will try to takeoff in anyway possible.
- Ship. Parts. I don't know anything about ships, but having a catapult, arresting wire parts, engines, and more would be a nice present to ship builders.
- Fix. The. Yaw. Physics. I don't care if it shakes my plane side to side after yawing, just please make it actually have an effect on our flight path.
+2More thing I want to add: