Trying to be original while simultaneously trying to replicate something is almost, like 97% impossible. When making a replica, I don't suggest that you try to be original, because someone, and someway will do it first. If you want to be original, put a feature that's exclusive to your aircraft and not replicate an aircraft design. I'm sorry but, It's kind of dumb to think "I want to replicate this to be original".
If you want to be more original, just make a fictional one, why not? This is SimplePlanes, where the impossible could be possible. Put your creativity into it.
@ElevatorEnthusiast747
I don't understand.
Okay, let me translate this a little bit:
So what you're saying is: "it works, but it faces the opposite direction of what I want it to face"?
@xNotDumb
wdym? I put "ZeroWithSlashedO" because I can't use "ø" for a name
also if this is a joke, I'm sorry, your joke is confusing enough to be recognized
And this is why we need to have the ability of selecting VTOL nozzles into VTOL engines. Kinda like how the car parts does. Because with VTOL nozzles, you can either have this nice vapor trails, or nice afterburners.
yeah youtube does that Idk why
YT thinks my ACX video is an AC2 video because I had AC2 music which is blaring at the background.
also, Razer's video :D
Hmm... I guess set LandingGear to the door bay rotator's input, then put "max" at 0, and the "min" at -1. If the direction is reversed, just invert the rotator. Not by rotating the rotator, but by inverting the input of the rotator. Though rotating the rotator also works I guess.
I'm not blaming you for posting a successor to my F-16, it's just that... Description needs to change... And also do keep in mind I am a minor, and still pretty much a dumb 14 year old who has no idea of how the world works around him.
Hmm...
OHHHH, you mean the "veering to the side" thing that tends to happen to custom gears?
Well, for that, you can go to the settings, enable manual traction, and reduce the sideways traction. Although the "veering" still exists, it wouldn't be as strong as it was before. But, decreasing this also reduces your tire grip in turning.
I recommend tuning it into around 50-70. Going too low will cause the tire to lose grip significantly, causing the ability to drift like a drunk man if you don't countersteer immediately after turning.
@CookieFlightSystems
Try giving a space after the quotation marks behind "Dist" and "Rel"
Like, "Target Speed Rel:" rate(TargetDistance);000000"m/s", if that doesn't work, try putting "()" in the codes
like (rate(TargetDistance);000000)"m/s"
@GriseoCattus
don't blame me, why didn't you think of it >:(
@GriseoCattus
I mean you could do it on the customizable viper
@Z46
+1Then again, these features are quite simple to make, it even made it to my F-14.
But eh, it fine :)
@DeveloperKorzalerke
+1np :)
enjoy them gifts :)
aww no little details/features sadge
no auto wingsweep sadge
no spoilers sadge
but,
Highway to the Danger Zone!
Gonna take you right into the Danger Zone!
+1beri kul
though I wish it had a different loadout than the base one.
@Oxen
Anyhow, that looks good.
@Oxen
That is way better than what i could do.
@Aviator01
+1I doubt that though.
I mean, why else would the Su-57 equipped with the laser which blinds all incoming IR missiles?
@Oxen
panellinggggggggg is pain
but panelling is pretty much the only way to it. I'm sorry, there's no easier way.
For cockpits, I guess the only logical cockpit for a 5th generation is a glass cockpit.
For wings, Idk tbh. I guess just look at references?
Trying to be original while simultaneously trying to replicate something is almost, like 97% impossible. When making a replica, I don't suggest that you try to be original, because someone, and someway will do it first. If you want to be original, put a feature that's exclusive to your aircraft and not replicate an aircraft design. I'm sorry but, It's kind of dumb to think "I want to replicate this to be original".
If you want to be more original, just make a fictional one, why not? This is SimplePlanes, where the impossible could be possible. Put your creativity into it.
@xNotDumb
Why would I?
Besides, I'm not a ship guy.
Cool, but why tag?
@OrderlyHippo
+1That's what I suggested in the first place. "Use glass fuselage, put the inside at transparent".
@xNotDumb
Again, wdym?
@ElevatorEnthusiast747
I don't understand.
Okay, let me translate this a little bit:
So what you're saying is: "it works, but it faces the opposite direction of what I want it to face"?
@SoupTime9957
Well... I did say "one of the first, if not the first", so yeah.
@latus
+1@Aviator01
+1@ColonelCanada
@SELWYN101
@Titaninfernal1
+1@FalcoOne
@Karmen
@IceCraftGaming
+2@SCPCalebkid
@TRD6932
@X99STRIKER
+1@KDnotSpy
@U
@xNotDumb
wdym? I put "ZeroWithSlashedO" because I can't use "ø" for a name
also if this is a joke, I'm sorry, your joke is confusing enough to be recognized
And this is why we need to have the ability of selecting VTOL nozzles into VTOL engines. Kinda like how the car parts does. Because with VTOL nozzles, you can either have this nice vapor trails, or nice afterburners.
+11Finally. Thank you.
+1Now have my upvote.
@ThatBanana
You can edit your post in the right side of the download counter.
oh god panelling planes are f*ckin terrifying.
+1yeah youtube does that Idk why
+1YT thinks my ACX video is an AC2 video because I had AC2 music which is blaring at the background.
also, Razer's video :D
Hmm... I guess set LandingGear to the door bay rotator's input, then put "max" at 0, and the "min" at -1. If the direction is reversed, just invert the rotator. Not by rotating the rotator, but by inverting the input of the rotator. Though rotating the rotator also works I guess.
@ThatBanana
Oh, so you're not seeing any problems at all, huh? Not even the emojis or the way you talk in the description, huh?
camo
also for the question:
do one the same as mine :)
nice :D
+2I'm not blaming you for posting a successor to my F-16, it's just that... Description needs to change... And also do keep in mind I am a minor, and still pretty much a dumb 14 year old who has no idea of how the world works around him.
@Xx24reminder
yes, very useful
very very much useful if you decided to pay attention and use hollow fuselages
@Chickendude
ty
Hmm...
+2OHHHH, you mean the "veering to the side" thing that tends to happen to custom gears?
Well, for that, you can go to the settings, enable manual traction, and reduce the sideways traction. Although the "veering" still exists, it wouldn't be as strong as it was before. But, decreasing this also reduces your tire grip in turning.
I recommend tuning it into around 50-70. Going too low will cause the tire to lose grip significantly, causing the ability to drift like a drunk man if you don't countersteer immediately after turning.
not even tired :WICKED:
+2:D
+1a more mobile friendly of my F-16 :D
sheeeeeeeeeeesh
@SELWYN101
Look at pinned comment.
@ThatBanana
Well... I guess I'll do something about that in the future.
hmmm
hmmmmmmmmmmmm
ah sh*t, didn't get the chance to participate.
+1@Xx24reminder
I swear to fucking god, don't use the normal fuselage goddamit
just fuckin'
I want to scream in agony
@OperatorLeaf
Denied.
@DwiAngkasaAeronautics
njir magician ampun banh
also, platinum bentar lagi, ganbare~
@CookieFlightSystems
Try giving a space after the quotation marks behind "Dist" and "Rel"
Like, "Target Speed Rel:" rate(TargetDistance);000000"m/s", if that doesn't work, try putting "()" in the codes
like (rate(TargetDistance);000000)"m/s"
what the 0 performance cost
+2how tf lmao
fast boiii
+1