I am going to be very brutally honest, and for that, I am sorry
nobody cared
this is a website where people only cares about planes and internet points, not drama
this is not twitter, this is simpleplanes.com
I know, it's probably like a heavy hit on your mental attitude or something, but if you want to discuss about that, please not here.
well, I have one solution
that is increase the engine max input to something absurd, maybe like 5, then put the exhaust size on the Z axis to something small, maybe like 0.7 or smth Idk
@Kendog84
Oh, you mean the rotator issues? Yep. Don't know what caused it so I couldn't fix it. It's not really the code, because the code worked fine on my other aircraft. It's probably something about the data.
Vulcan is indeed > Avenger
just them VRRRRT sounds so amusing
The F-14 suck
at least the A variant, that thing suck ass
I agree, Aardvark is > Warthog
while I do oppose that the Thunderbolt II is useless as shit, the Aardvark is doing a better job, hell even the F-15 does CAS way better
No, and yes, the F-22 is overrated
on paper and practice, the thing is very very dominant in the skies, but it's just old, it needs to be replaced sometime in the future
and also it's very hard to be upgraded
raptor fans generally like to compare it to other fighters, and it's understandable how on the surface, the raptor is very very dominant, but if you put it in a situation where the enemy matches it's capabilities, say the J-20, it's probably going to be very equal
Dogfighting is not necessary
to some extent, yes
but my friend on Discord pointed out that "If stealth would become better, dogfight isn't necessarily dead"
to some extent, both parties would have such great stealth capabilities, that their missiles just barely track and soon they'll have to get into dogfights again
but with technology constantly improving, who knows what lies ahead
check if the parts connected to the part of the rotator you want to move are connected to what it isn't supposed to be connected
if you even understand what I mean lmao
just check the connections
smiling friends
also what in the hell is that single engine TVC
you already have huge wing loading, how much more maneuverability do you want?
I am fully expecting a "yes." answer
@MrCOPTY
well it is, but the difference is that the NF-15B STOL/MTD has a 2D pannelled tvc as well as the ability to reverse thrust and the NF-15B ACTIVE has a 3D thrust vectoring, nothing else
@Hiimakeplanes
eh, they just look like em
they're not exactly abrams per se
just more of "heavily inspired"
basically the same way of how you depict every fictional 5th gen fighter ever.
you forgor one basic thing that every other suggestors missed and ignore, but will be very very cool is
the ability to distinguish an A-A target and an A-G target with your creations
saw a message in the dev console that says "aircraft is deemed not airworthy" or smth, and that could just do it tbh
also pls extend the range of the A-G detection range, it's really bad
let's be honest, who doesn't want to try slamming their SLAM-ER into a goddamn yamato?
Also, maybe, just maybe add a HE round to the gun? I know we have HE rounds on cannons, but sheesh, I want that on the gun too
overall tho, good suggestion list :)
@Aarav
if I could replace it with somebody's that'd be great
we have too much airpower
if I could, I'll replace the self propelled anti tank with mine
if I couldn't, replace the KAQ-1A
no need for a long range drone if I can easily convert the KFQ-1A from a standalone air superiority to multirole strike drone
actually, just remove the KAQ-1A, replace it with this, besides, Snowstone and Yeager is only about 30 miles out, the KFQ-1A can easily cover that range
I am going to be very brutally honest, and for that, I am sorry
nobody cared
this is a website where people only cares about planes and internet points, not drama
this is not twitter, this is simpleplanes.com
I know, it's probably like a heavy hit on your mental attitude or something, but if you want to discuss about that, please not here.
yaknow
front control surfaces tend to have a completely opposite effect as it would if you put it behind
well, I have one solution
+1that is increase the engine max input to something absurd, maybe like 5, then put the exhaust size on the Z axis to something small, maybe like 0.7 or smth Idk
iIrc you need 200 or more points
@Aarav
no problem man
it was fun
@Vincent
hey man can you please help this guy thanks
make this a successor to this:
link go brr
ok thanks man
@Kendog84
Thanks.
@Kendog84
Oh, you mean the rotator issues? Yep. Don't know what caused it so I couldn't fix it. It's not really the code, because the code worked fine on my other aircraft. It's probably something about the data.
@TheAlternative
on the surface, yes
but alot more things are factoring to what makes a 5th gen well 5th gen
@SPAircraftOfficial
+1brøther
what is wrong with your knowledge
+1Vulcan is indeed > Avenger
just them VRRRRT sounds so amusing
The F-14 suck
at least the A variant, that thing suck ass
I agree, Aardvark is > Warthog
while I do oppose that the Thunderbolt II is useless as shit, the Aardvark is doing a better job, hell even the F-15 does CAS way better
No, and yes, the F-22 is overrated
on paper and practice, the thing is very very dominant in the skies, but it's just old, it needs to be replaced sometime in the future
and also it's very hard to be upgraded
raptor fans generally like to compare it to other fighters, and it's understandable how on the surface, the raptor is very very dominant, but if you put it in a situation where the enemy matches it's capabilities, say the J-20, it's probably going to be very equal
Dogfighting is not necessary
to some extent, yes
but my friend on Discord pointed out that "If stealth would become better, dogfight isn't necessarily dead"
to some extent, both parties would have such great stealth capabilities, that their missiles just barely track and soon they'll have to get into dogfights again
but with technology constantly improving, who knows what lies ahead
OMG GUYYSSS IT'S THE TOGUHN PLAEN ABSOLUTELY LOEV DIS TIENG
+2@MrCOPTY
+1yeb
too lazy to put custom weapons
shid
+2I tried making a fishbed
it got more than 25 parts
oh well
miraj time.
can I post more than one.
+2@GotovoYaTut
+1yes.
@WinsWings
+2another?
ok
look guys the burner is green
+5greer.
zamn.
+2check if the parts connected to the part of the rotator you want to move are connected to what it isn't supposed to be connected
+2if you even understand what I mean lmao
just check the connections
smiling friends
also what in the hell is that single engine TVC
you already have huge wing loading, how much more maneuverability do you want?
I am fully expecting a "yes." answer
I see a 3 rack mav.
+1I don't see a SNIPER or a LITENING pod.
Cursed.
Never knew you'd need 30 points to upvote something.
+1Also, upload an aircraft.
hm.
+3would be cool tbh
@HMSIllustriousMyBeloved
I mean I could
not sure if I would.
@MrCOPTY
+1technically speaking, no
actuality, yes.
what do you need
missed opportunity to have it fighting with the ouroboros xfa-36a
+1@MrCOPTY
+2well it is, but the difference is that the NF-15B STOL/MTD has a 2D pannelled tvc as well as the ability to reverse thrust and the NF-15B ACTIVE has a 3D thrust vectoring, nothing else
@AWESOMENESS360
+1exactly what I was thinking.
good job btw
I'm getting a very strong electrosphere vibes from here
+1hm what if
+3smokeTrailOpacitywould be cool for something like a realistic rocket smoke on an AIM-120C/D or an AIM-9X
distorted fixy.
ok.
+2depending where boeing would go after that, it could either be a tremendous letdown or a revolutionary technology
+1@Hiimakeplanes
eh, they just look like em
they're not exactly abrams per se
just more of "heavily inspired"
basically the same way of how you depict every fictional 5th gen fighter ever.
tough match
+1let's see which can be faster.
@Hiimakeplanes
problem?
@Aarav yes
hey guy, can I "upgrade" your SPAAG?
+1I won't be the one publishing it tho, you can have all the glory
you forgor one basic thing that every other suggestors missed and ignore, but will be very very cool is
+1the ability to distinguish an A-A target and an A-G target with your creations
saw a message in the dev console that says "aircraft is deemed not airworthy" or smth, and that could just do it tbh
also pls extend the range of the A-G detection range, it's really bad
let's be honest, who doesn't want to try slamming their SLAM-ER into a goddamn yamato?
Also, maybe, just maybe add a HE round to the gun? I know we have HE rounds on cannons, but sheesh, I want that on the gun too
overall tho, good suggestion list :)
@Aarav
+1no, made my mind up
replace the kaq-1a
can I have the gun damage non stock?
dw it won't be 1 shot op
@Aarav
+1if I could replace it with somebody's that'd be great
we have too much airpower
if I could, I'll replace the self propelled anti tank with mine
if I couldn't, replace the KAQ-1A
no need for a long range drone if I can easily convert the KFQ-1A from a standalone air superiority to multirole strike drone
actually, just remove the KAQ-1A, replace it with this, besides, Snowstone and Yeager is only about 30 miles out, the KFQ-1A can easily cover that range
@Aarav
not if I replace the KM2A with the improved variant
@Aarav
aight
time to upgrade the michael
wait
150mm?
is that even allowed?
@StugnaATGM
+2I saw it
might need to counter that
@Aarav
let them be
they'll submit sooner or later
I really should continue my tornado