ceil(smooth(clamp01(input), 1/X)) for activation floor(smooth(clamp01(input), 1/X)) for deactivation round(smooth(clamp01(input), 1/X)) for both
X is in seconds
you have the properties setting for a reason man
also, no you can't fire off countermeasures with any other buttons other than launch countermeasure buttons
I agree on heat seeking missiles, another thing I'd like to add is the rear or all aspect capability, it would be so awesome
I'm a bit 50/50 on the rocket pods since you can just make them yourself, albeit with great effort
low drag bombs already exist (boom 50), what we truly need is a high drag bomb
you can basically take the boom 25 and rescale it to make an FAB-500 since there's not much different and you can always make custom bombs anyway
kind of agree but then again you can always make a custom model of it yourself
why don't we just rescale, edit the mass and the explosion scale to make a bigger bomb, is that too much task?
you can basically make smart bombs already, we don't really need a new weapon for it
@rexzion
I used normal fuselage to get the colored lines for the first image
I used the trim of the fuselage intake to get the colored lines for the 2nd image
it doesn't save much but it saves abit
@Ffddd
ada banyak sih
kalo masalah pertama, mungkin ada yg salah di airbrake yg gw pasang jadinya ngelimit top speed
kalo masalah kedua, pesawat ya gitu mas, pake trim coba kan gak capek jadinya
===TL===
(nobody cares but eh, I'll just do it anyway cause ynot)
there's alot
for the first problem, there may be something wrong with the airbrake I placed which limits the top speed
for the second one, well it's what airplanes do, use trim so you don't get tired
le fishe
god, Japanese trends can be weird sometimes lmao
I have been seeing alot of these things in my twitter feed and Idfk why it can be that popular
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
here's what I have to say about your counterarguments:
delta wings are terrible for subsonic speeds, why? energy retention
wait, so what you're saying is that you put a canard that is inches away from touching the wing? wtf
I don't question the intake placement, but I question your control surfaces now what in the world
unlike the F-16, this thing looks like the moment it stalls out, it's unrecoverable no matter what you do
I don't mean that the landing gear is too low, I mean that the landing gear has no space (realistically) for it to retract, because it's taken up by the engine placement (this doesn't apply in SP ofc because SP's morfology can be easily bypassed lmfao)
I have no comments for the last 2 points
other than that, you're welcome
appearance review:
8/10
woaou
design looks very plausible for supersonic flight, albeit, just above transonic
looks somewhat maneuverable, but still looks like it has a positive stability design
that wingtip pylon does not look fine lmao
this looks very plausible for a 90s era jet
appearance review:
7/10
that moment when no radar.
why is the gun on the nose, a10 style
I mean, I would understand why if you used a rotary cannon but this is an autocannon, moreover single barreled
that, said nice design, very plausible for it's time
looks pretty maneuverable, and stable
kinda like the F-5
yeag
appearance review:
5/10
for it's class, this definitely does not fit lmao :v
this is definitely a bomber, not an LCA
although, granted it only has 1 engine
atop of the tail
that's gonna be an issue, yikes
appearaance review:
8/10
I love this Imma be honest with you
chubby lil plane, perfect for attacking ground targets, vietnam style
very, very plausible design for a 70s aircraft, also looks very versatile
fuselage looks long enough, you can basically turn this thing into a supersonic aircraft by putting on afterburner engines like real
IT HAS SPLITTER PLATES WOOO
also nighttime capabilities, nice :D
my only complain is that the canopy bow is only present for the WSO seat, which doesn't look very strong for a canopy at that time to handle more Gs
apart from that very epig
appearance review (yes I'm doing this for my own plane):
8/10
honestly was very happi with this design
everything was taken into consideration, although there are some things I'm a little unhappy about
that'll hopefully be fixed in the future :)
appearance review:
6/10
honestly, does not look very fun to fly, nor does it look appealing
aircraft looks unstable, and it doesn't look aerodynamic
nose cone looks too small for a radar
thin, delta wings suggests a supersonic trainer configuration, but since the aircraft doesn't look that aerodynamic, I doubt it can go past mach 1 (realistically)
engine config is... questionable
so is the main landing gear
however, this has potential
if it's redesigned with proper aeronautical engineering in mind, it has potential to be a great platform
I love delta wings. They're just, pog.
oh no that looks uncannyall I can say is
+3o7
good luck.
I now want to experience what it feels like to enter my own challenge
+1however, maximum of 300 parts is going to be a challenge
MiG-31K.
+1so wait
ini mau gmn ceritanya?
ceil(smooth(clamp01(input), 1/X))for activationfloor(smooth(clamp01(input), 1/X))for deactivationround(smooth(clamp01(input), 1/X))for bothX is in seconds
sounds like a skill issue to me
+2dude
+1estimated 560?
god damn
absolutely no fucking way
+4oh you mf
how have I just noticed this
you have the properties setting for a reason man
also, no you can't fire off countermeasures with any other buttons other than launch countermeasure buttons
@Yourlocalhuman
awok
no fuckin way
+1ebic
HARM with no HTS
interesting
I agree on heat seeking missiles, another thing I'd like to add is the rear or all aspect capability, it would be so awesome
+2I'm a bit 50/50 on the rocket pods since you can just make them yourself, albeit with great effort
low drag bombs already exist (boom 50), what we truly need is a high drag bomb
you can basically take the boom 25 and rescale it to make an FAB-500 since there's not much different and you can always make custom bombs anyway
kind of agree but then again you can always make a custom model of it yourself
why don't we just rescale, edit the mass and the explosion scale to make a bigger bomb, is that too much task?
you can basically make smart bombs already, we don't really need a new weapon for it
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
they'll hit a small island near Krakabloa on PC
and based on the trajectory of these things, they may hit Snowstone
they just go straight
never stopping until they hit land
@rexzion
I used normal fuselage to get the colored lines for the first image
I used the trim of the fuselage intake to get the colored lines for the 2nd image
it doesn't save much but it saves abit
@rexzion
nah
@Ffddd
ada banyak sih
kalo masalah pertama, mungkin ada yg salah di airbrake yg gw pasang jadinya ngelimit top speed
kalo masalah kedua, pesawat ya gitu mas, pake trim coba kan gak capek jadinya
===TL===
(nobody cares but eh, I'll just do it anyway cause ynot)
there's alot
for the first problem, there may be something wrong with the airbrake I placed which limits the top speed
for the second one, well it's what airplanes do, use trim so you don't get tired
@XxRxX @rexzion
I used the trim of the fuselage intake to do the colored lines
it happens yes
jetstreams exist
despite what it is Random is actually a unique nickname lol
+3this is not a profitable market
what are you even
what the hell
don't be intimidated
cause at the end of the time we're all just humans and losing is a part of improving
le fishe
+3god, Japanese trends can be weird sometimes lmao
I have been seeing alot of these things in my twitter feed and Idfk why it can be that popular
@AlivePan
+1raitod!!!
@LinusTouchTips
eh I thought it was good enough
@HoshimachiSuiseiMyBeloved
cool
woao
+1epig
blåhaj
now we have 3 people who make their teasers DCS styled lmao
+2and one person who straight up made DCS in SP.
yoo pog
heya
+1@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
+3understandable have a great day
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
here's what I have to say about your counterarguments:
I don't question the intake placement, but I question your control surfaces now what in the world
I have no comments for the last 2 points
other than that, you're welcome
appearance review:
8/10
attack.
that's it, this just screams that way.
wait I just realized
GLIDE BOOOOOOOOOOOOOMBS
appearance review:
+18/10
woaou
design looks very plausible for supersonic flight, albeit, just above transonic
looks somewhat maneuverable, but still looks like it has a positive stability design
that wingtip pylon does not look fine lmao
this looks very plausible for a 90s era jet
appearance review:
7/10
that moment when no radar.
why is the gun on the nose, a10 style
I mean, I would understand why if you used a rotary cannon but this is an autocannon, moreover single barreled
that, said nice design, very plausible for it's time
looks pretty maneuverable, and stable
kinda like the F-5
yeag
appearance review:
+15/10
for it's class, this definitely does not fit lmao :v
this is definitely a bomber, not an LCA
although, granted it only has 1 engine
atop of the tail
that's gonna be an issue, yikes
appearaance review:
8/10
I love this Imma be honest with you
chubby lil plane, perfect for attacking ground targets, vietnam style
very, very plausible design for a 70s aircraft, also looks very versatile
fuselage looks long enough, you can basically turn this thing into a supersonic aircraft by putting on afterburner engines like real
IT HAS SPLITTER PLATES WOOO
also nighttime capabilities, nice :D
my only complain is that the canopy bow is only present for the WSO seat, which doesn't look very strong for a canopy at that time to handle more Gs
apart from that very epig
appearance review (yes I'm doing this for my own plane):
8/10
honestly was very happi with this design
everything was taken into consideration, although there are some things I'm a little unhappy about
that'll hopefully be fixed in the future :)
appearance review:
6/10
honestly, does not look very fun to fly, nor does it look appealing
aircraft looks unstable, and it doesn't look aerodynamic
nose cone looks too small for a radar
thin, delta wings suggests a supersonic trainer configuration, but since the aircraft doesn't look that aerodynamic, I doubt it can go past mach 1 (realistically)
engine config is... questionable
so is the main landing gear
however, this has potential
if it's redesigned with proper aeronautical engineering in mind, it has potential to be a great platform
I love delta wings. They're just, pog.
gonna proceed to review the appearance of each aircraft cause I'm bored asf and I have no motivation to do anything
bru
@TheTomatoLover
+1good
@TheTomatoLover
pft
what in the world lmfao
I need to kill this other me where the fuck is he
@TheTomatoLover
the hell did I even say