this is obviously false
it's kinda the same as japanese or chinese people, you just rarely see em
also Idc where you're from, if you make good stuff then you're cool
unless you talk like a person trying to get their discount over at costco without buying anything whatsoever
I'm going to say with my honest opinion, but I think what people forgot most about is that SimplePlanes was not meant to be in-depth like how Flyout is.
This is me speaking as a non-Flyout player, so take this with a little salt.
SimplePlanes nowadays sounded sort of counteractive with what the community brings out. But, for what it is? I say it lives up to it's name. SimplePlanes was made so people understand the general physics to design an aircraft, not to give an in-depth simulation of your design. It serves as a first step in designing an aircraft. Sure, it might not be realistic, but SimplePlanes never was made to be realistic.
Flyout on the other hand, is the sandbox that takes you to the next step. It introduces a lot of physical aspect that you might not have learnt in SimplePlanes. It also challenges your creativity with practicality, as where SimplePlanes was more about how much creative can you be. Unlike SimplePlanes, Flyout is meant with realism in mind. It not only teaches you the basic, but goes a little more in-depth. You can say the same with JNO.
Now to say with the building, it is definitely easier to make stuff in Flyout for lesser parts, but it is a lot easier to understand SimplePlanes' building mechanics. This is, as you said, the exact reason why people can make banger shit in SimplePlanes, outside of planes. I'm not saying Flyout isn't capable of doing this as well, it most definitely is. It's just that since SimplePlanes was never meant to be realistic, it's a much smoother learning curve than trying to learn how to make in Flyout. This, is basically the same point as in the video.
In short? No, SimplePlanes aren't going anywhere, anytime soon. Even after people have gotten a better device for a cheaper price, SimplePlanes won't likely be forgotten to new aviators who wants to test their aircraft building skills. Or even other things.
the fact that when I scroll down to upvote this and I see Andrew's username on the upvote list blows my mind
anyway ngl it looks kinda like a goofi j10
@CallsignTig
unfortunately, yeah
I tried going for a realistic sense, but to be honest, I didn't do a very good job.
mainly because I was just tired of continuing it, as it costs a lot of performance on my device.
oh my god how dare you I'm so offended rn
@Dathcha
it's an actual invite link.
never judge a book by it's cover.
@Aviator720
+1check profile.
this is obviously false
+1it's kinda the same as japanese or chinese people, you just rarely see em
also Idc where you're from, if you make good stuff then you're cool
unless you talk like a person trying to get their discount over at costco without buying anything whatsoever
it's what it exactly says.
+1@MABURv2
gw aj butuh 2 taun buat sampe 40 jir 🗿
gw akui, bagus bet jir
mau road to plat pt ii kah?
it's that time of the day again
+62 fuselage unit is equal to 1m. So 1 unit is equal to 0.5m.
+1@DatMaluchGuy19
+1@ZerkkFujimi
@ImAcarperson
何これ？面白ｗ
@KenzarAircraft
behind the '/'.
@KenzarAircraft
I'm not sure which one you're referring to.
@KenzarAircraft
change the divider value to a higher number.
ya'll be acting like flyout is a death sentence to sp
+2calm down
sp will still be here for the foreseeable future
@1269660183
+1I'm sorry in advance but
skill issue
I'm going to say with my honest opinion, but I think what people forgot most about is that SimplePlanes was not meant to be in-depth like how Flyout is.
+6This is me speaking as a non-Flyout player, so take this with a little salt.
SimplePlanes nowadays sounded sort of counteractive with what the community brings out. But, for what it is? I say it lives up to it's name. SimplePlanes was made so people understand the general physics to design an aircraft, not to give an in-depth simulation of your design. It serves as a first step in designing an aircraft. Sure, it might not be realistic, but SimplePlanes never was made to be realistic.
Flyout on the other hand, is the sandbox that takes you to the next step. It introduces a lot of physical aspect that you might not have learnt in SimplePlanes. It also challenges your creativity with practicality, as where SimplePlanes was more about how much creative can you be. Unlike SimplePlanes, Flyout is meant with realism in mind. It not only teaches you the basic, but goes a little more in-depth. You can say the same with JNO.
Now to say with the building, it is definitely easier to make stuff in Flyout for lesser parts, but it is a lot easier to understand SimplePlanes' building mechanics. This is, as you said, the exact reason why people can make banger shit in SimplePlanes, outside of planes. I'm not saying Flyout isn't capable of doing this as well, it most definitely is. It's just that since SimplePlanes was never meant to be realistic, it's a much smoother learning curve than trying to learn how to make in Flyout. This, is basically the same point as in the video.
In short? No, SimplePlanes aren't going anywhere, anytime soon. Even after people have gotten a better device for a cheaper price, SimplePlanes won't likely be forgotten to new aviators who wants to test their aircraft building skills. Or even other things.
the asraam had thrust vectoring?
I thought it doesn't
unfortunate news, you can't.
+1好き。
+1this is so goofy I kinda like it
+2you had me at first take suichan I will admit
16:9
+1the fact that when I scroll down to upvote this and I see Andrew's username on the upvote list blows my mind
+2anyway ngl it looks kinda like a goofi j10
@ToeTips
+1no.
@Yourlocalhuman
As if I didn't plan to.
@SPAircraftOfficial
@XAircraftManufacturer
+2@DatMaluchGuy19
@IceCraftGaming
@TheTomatoLover
+1no.
please just call me zero.
@TheTomatoLover
+1'ppreciate your ping but, the way you speak to me genuinely annoys me so stop.
@Dragoranos
+1There we go, problem solved, I was never mad.
@Dragoranos
Can you really consider that as me being mad?
@Dragoranos
When have I ever said I was mad?
reinmcdeer back at it again
I wonder how you do the AGM-130, that seems like a cool thing
@CallsignTig
+1unfortunately, yeah
I tried going for a realistic sense, but to be honest, I didn't do a very good job.
mainly because I was just tired of continuing it, as it costs a lot of performance on my device.
abso fucking lutely
+33 words
+3do it yourself
@Bullozeee
it's not just beg, but yeah Ig
just, my absolute tip:
don't chase for points, chase for creativity.
it feels really scummy when you start talking about upvotes tbh Idk why
+1@LoneSpaceGaming
did I seriously put that in
guh
another day, another hour, another one takes a life.
+2tf happened to this comment section?
+1I'm more interested about the gun ngl
nice
+1putting the cobra button on this thing sounds nice
@Kovick
I don't mind people having different iterations of my planes also
just please put a credit.
damm
I uh
I think this is originally mine.
please use credit.
whar
muh babe :D
absolutely phenomenal
+1love this
blud
+3Sometimes you gotta wonder why these changes are a thing