34.7k YuukaNeko Comments

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @AudioDud3 Ouch... way to deflate my pride as a creator X3

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @flyingsteve88 Thanks!

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @Austen You can do whatever you want! I'd love to see your innovations

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @Pilotmario Sure, I'd love to see it! Share it with me in an unlisted post

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @Austen I've actually tried to make the ODIN, but I couldn't quite get it down. If you check out my profile, I did make a kinetic bombardment satellite, similar in concept

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @thelastgemini0 @Austen Go for it!

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @bjac0 If only the part count had been 666...

  • AR-15 Contractor “New-Type” 5.8 years ago

    @Dllama4 Thanks!

  • SAN Amakaze (DD-01) 5.8 years ago

    @BlazeInfinity Thanks, hon! I might even post today, actually

  • Honeybadger 5.8 years ago

    Not sure. I believe this gun is extremely niche, and is best suited for special forces. Here’s the thing: in terms of stopping power, 300 BLK is subjectively better than 5.56, especially when comparing subsonic ammunition. However, I believe that for most military applications, a dedicated subsonic round is not necessary. This is why special forces will continue to gravitate to carbines such as the HK416C, with detachable suppressors. If subsonic 300 BLK was an absolute necessity, there are better platforms available; the Sig MCX LVAW comes to mind @Flash0of0green

  • AR-15 Contractor 5.8 years ago

    Would you mind if I reposted a revision of this? @Pilotmario

  • Honeybadger 5.8 years ago

    Too many attachments? Sounds just like me! @Flash0of0green

  • Honeybadger (work in progress) 5.8 years ago

    Grip is too big, magazine is too small, and the receiver is absolutely tiny! Try and proportion the rest of the gun in relation to the handguard, which looks good

  • CA Prinz Eugen 1941.3 5.9 years ago

    Beautiful!

  • XMD-1 Railgun Turret 5.9 years ago

    I don’t even think it’s your device, the “rail” just moves stupidly fast XD @Neoteraphyte

    +1
  • Colt SMG | Para 5.9 years ago

    A beautiful weapon <3

  • JT-12A (Remastered) 5.9 years ago

    Good to see you posting again!

  • IJN OSAKA-01 6.0 years ago

    Indeed! @LegoFreak

  • H&K MP5A2 6.2 years ago

    Alright, I guess. Honestly, I’ve had a creative block for a while now... All of my new guns are absolute trash! @Pilotmario

  • H&K MP5A2 6.2 years ago

    Heya, Pilot! Super sweet build, as always

  • M.Corp Jackal LAT 6.2 years ago

    So sorry, I never got to take a look at whatever you shared with me. Want to share it with me again?

  • Vehicle Challenge(1st place= 30 ups) 6.2 years ago

    I love your icon X3

  • takoyaki boat 6.3 years ago

    This is so cute! I love these things!

  • USF-M1aB Assault Rifle 6.3 years ago

    Alright! It's such a pretty finished product!

    +1
  • NCC-1701-B 6.3 years ago

    Totally awesome!

  • AR-15 Contractor 6.3 years ago

    Lovely <3

  • Ender's Game MD500 v2 6.3 years ago

    I absolutely love you now, Driver! And remember, the enemy's gate is down X3

  • Functional Bolt-Action Rifle 6.3 years ago

    What physics quality should this be run on? On high, the bullets won't move forward all the way

  • Flying Castle 6.4 years ago

    >Not Howl's Flying Castle
    >inb4 God-tier trash

  • SimplePlanes Small Arms Guild 6.4 years ago

    @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing You're quite a good builder. I look forward to seeing you put out some more firearms ^^

  • SimplePlanes Small Arms Guild 6.4 years ago

    @Pilotmarion Also, @PyrusEnderhunter is probably one of our most well-established firearm "brands" on the site, although again, primarily not "MilSpec"

  • SimplePlanes Small Arms Guild 6.4 years ago

    @Pilotmario Is @PINK still active? He should definitely be included... @Supercraft888 is a skilled weapon builder, I also nominate @DestinyAviation, although most of his builds are more futuristic than, well "MilSpec," I guess

  • YTech Scrap-Yard M4A1 [Scrap-Yard Challenge] 6.4 years ago

    I got tired, hon... @Flash0of0green

  • YTech Scrap-Yard M4A1 [Scrap-Yard Challenge] 6.4 years ago

    @EternalDarkness Thanks ^^

  • Seraph Class Dreadnought 6.4 years ago

    Beautiful! But seriously, someone tell me, how do you upload photos with your uploads?

  • Logo Challenge CLOSED 6.4 years ago

    I will submit my logo!

    +1
  • Scrap-Yard Challenge! [CLOSED] 6.4 years ago

    @FGW2014 Deadline is January 1st

  • China NAVY CV-16 6.4 years ago

    Like a panorama. Very cool!

  • Leo Class Battlecruiser (1943) 6.4 years ago

    @Halphas It's pretty <3

  • EE-45 6.4 years ago

    @Quip Why?

  • Question: XML Scaling 6.4 years ago

    @Tully2001 Ah, thank you

  • Question: XML Scaling 6.4 years ago

    @spefyjerbf @Supercraft888 @Feanor

  • Question: XML Scaling 6.4 years ago

    @Pilotmario @Dllama4 @NirvashTec Would any of you guys know anything?

  • H&K M11A1 6.4 years ago

    @NirvashTec Thanks! I feel kinda bad though, I totally forgot to ask your permission before hand... hope you don't mind?

  • H&K M11A1 6.4 years ago

    @Z3RO Throwback to the days of Black Ops 1... good times

  • H&K M11A1 6.4 years ago

    @GermanWarMachine Adjustable is the key word in the description ^^

  • H&K M11A1 6.4 years ago

    @Ephwurd The goal was to double the hit reliability of the M16, I believe? None of the four rifles submitted even came close to that goal

  • IJN OSAKA-01 6.4 years ago

    @ForeverPie Thanks, hon ^^

  • Mantarraya del vacio (Void ray) STARCRAFT 6.4 years ago

    As a huge fan of StarCraft... this is seriously freaking awesome!

  • Streaming Tomorrow! 6.4 years ago

    Yay!