I had that idea before and had a second account. But I think it is better to focus on one account. So I post only "concept works" on the second account, no detailed ones.
@AndrewGarrison, I did not know that "SEA SLUG" by @DwiAngkasaAeronautics was built in SP2. It was the winner of my Sea Plane rebuild challenge, based on my concept drawing. Well done!
Good try. I would label it as a "Compound Helicopter" instead of "AutoGyro" - the latter has NO power in the main rotor. The main rotor is just a rotating wing. You could try making it without power for the main rotor on the same airframe.
@GABRIOX10 Too much censorship makes the kids dump. and don't let them see the history. And with the rise of fake AI... well, I can't imagine the next 20 years. The same mistake will take over again and again - since we never learn from the past and try to erase all
Mods, please take action; Erotic Ad weblink / comment at the bottom - @BaconAircraft @Seeras @Vincent sorry to bother you guys. Thanks for your help. There are so many underage users in this community
@BRNavyPilot Thanks. It's hard to explain, but let me try; the elevator surface is too large (or the rotation angle is too wide if you use a rotator), while the nose (or front parts) are too heavy. then it can not handle forces correctly. It happens to me sometimes, but I will even it out before posting it. Also, making airplanes fly at a level (without the use of a gyroscope) is another good challenge. After all, it is all about Physics, CoM, CoT, and CoL, making all these work together. There may be XML or Mods to edit, but I do not enjoy them. I love working with raw Physics properties.
Thanks for sharing. I will credit if I could use it for some Arab airforces
+2nice. Love to upvote this other than seeing "another Su27"
+2I had that idea before and had a second account. But I think it is better to focus on one account. So I post only "concept works" on the second account, no detailed ones.
+2@AviationLoverGEEK444 Thanks
+2that's amazing
+2@X99STRIKER @SuperSuperTheSylph @IQinventory
+2@Sockdragger I had a grey Scottish short-haired when I was a teenager. He loved me so much and followed me around like a dog
+2@AviationLoverGEEK444 thanks
+2@SuperSuperTheSylph General, you have been promoted!
+2@AviationLoverGEEK444 what are you talking about?
+2@TheNewSPplayer @Superliner350 and @Rjenteissussy Thanks guys, you are so fast, I am still writing the description. Lol.
+2so beautiful, It deserve a Spotlight
+2@AndrewGarrison, I did not know that "SEA SLUG" by @DwiAngkasaAeronautics was built in SP2. It was the winner of my Sea Plane rebuild challenge, based on my concept drawing. Well done!
+2ha ha ha that's gooood
+2so cool, both the car as well as the drawings. and this surely need a spotlight!
+2@JBPAviation lol
+2@UnitedinOne90 Thanks, that is fast
+2good job, Soviet-style of X-29
+2beautiful work
+2@MrCOPTY That's awesome. I want to use a "screen" for one of my supersonic projects. It will be great if I can use one.
+2Good try. I would label it as a "Compound Helicopter" instead of "AutoGyro" - the latter has NO power in the main rotor. The main rotor is just a rotating wing. You could try making it without power for the main rotor on the same airframe.
+2graceful
+2This pack idea is very cool.
+2beautiful work, congrats on the 5th anniversary
+2Your computers and Youtube channel is amazing - that is what I love about the SP community.
+2@Jundroo @AndrewGarrison
+2@GABRIOX10 Too much censorship makes the kids dump. and don't let them see the history. And with the rise of fake AI... well, I can't imagine the next 20 years. The same mistake will take over again and again - since we never learn from the past and try to erase all
+2@Graingy Yes, I guess so, maybe. Thanks
+2It will be great if SP2 got ability to add custom texture such as camouflage by the users
+2@Calliope your car builds were so cute and lovely. Great work
+2@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Like dead peoples around. The community is kind of dried. There was 60 or more download in a day but NO interaction at all.
+2I am pleased to see a fascinating selection of aircraft this week, especially when people go deeper to discover some rare and lesser-known aircraft.
+2The Su shot down the Korean Airline 747
+2Good luck with the challenge. Spotlighted!
+2@SonsoftheMoth awesome. lol, this makes my life easier and less itchy. ha ha - It was a great build by the way -
+2The challenge was closed long ago, but I appreciate your participation. Great job! Upvoted and spotlighted.
+2@KSB24 @BRNavyPilot Thanks
+2@TheMouse as fast as the MiG
+2great video edit - as well as a great build. Lots of moving parts.
+2Awesome! you pass the first test. Spotlighted and upvoted. Good luck for the challenge
+2Thank You! @Liquidfox01 @ ShinyGemsBro @LunarEclipseSP
+2Mr. Been's parking rival LOL
+2@Rjenteissussy Thank You
+2@Rjenteissussy Oh yes....
+2Mods, please take action; Erotic Ad weblink / comment at the bottom - @BaconAircraft @Seeras @Vincent sorry to bother you guys. Thanks for your help. There are so many underage users in this community
+2@DARKSKIES and you can go to the XML editor and change the maxTargetingAngle to any narrower angle, 45 degrees for instance.
+2@DARKSKIES because I changed the targeting angle to around 170 degrees for gaming purposes, (which is too large to be realistic)
+250 upvotes for the 1st prize, (and a total of 105 upvotes). That is quite a challenge for the upvoter. Are you sure?
+2@BRNavyPilot Thanks. It's hard to explain, but let me try; the elevator surface is too large (or the rotation angle is too wide if you use a rotator), while the nose (or front parts) are too heavy. then it can not handle forces correctly. It happens to me sometimes, but I will even it out before posting it. Also, making airplanes fly at a level (without the use of a gyroscope) is another good challenge. After all, it is all about Physics, CoM, CoT, and CoL, making all these work together. There may be XML or Mods to edit, but I do not enjoy them. I love working with raw Physics properties.
+2@Christiant2 @GuardianAerospace Thanks
+2