@overlord5453 No, I down't want to restrict (changing the mass and drag to zero) but not to over do it. which ruins the reality when it is over do. The planes fly like a balloon rather than "heavier than air" aircraft.
@GeneralCorpInc
Good idea with your concept, and thanks for joining. Here is my input that may be helpful for your future builds.
- I consider your build as quite a modern design built between 1980-2010 by looking at the nosecone and style of the aircraft. Also, the blade style "Scimitar" (which is a modern one) will usually paired with a turbo-prop engine. So using an (old-fashioned) radial piston engine looks a bit off to me. Not many people will be picky about it, but just sharing my knowledge. Have fun and appreciate for joining.
@F8boa will do next time. noted
+1@overlord5453 Thanks, will do next time
+1@Monarchii yes, I have read about that once. I believe Ki-61 also got a German engine (licensed copy) or such.
+1@Monarchii I see. Shape wise, I prefer the P40 look of the Ki-61
+1@Thatrano @ThomasRoderick @Ethansimmons04
+1@Christiant2 @GuardianAerospace @KPLBall
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @upperflat @imakestuffsometimes
+1@Monarchii I think you are looking this one >>> Ki-61 which uses the inline engine and not the radial engine.
+1@AviadorArgentino no problem
+1spotlighted! good luck with the challenge.
+1Huh, I got to push this challenge up so that more people may join. Currently, it is very quiet
+1@MrCOPTY you could improve the cockpit details and repost it if you want
+1Thanks @DoughDough5 that is so fast, 2 seconds after upload
+1beautiful work my friend
+1awesome
+1Merhaba! Looks nice
+1@MrCOPTY yes
+1@MrCOPTY same here... lots of idea, but not much time to play
+1@overlord5453 No, I down't want to restrict (changing the mass and drag to zero) but not to over do it. which ruins the reality when it is over do. The planes fly like a balloon rather than "heavier than air" aircraft.
+1Great plane to fly.
+1@airlinerbuilder Yes, very little
+1@GeneralCorpInc
+1Good idea with your concept, and thanks for joining. Here is my input that may be helpful for your future builds.
- I consider your build as quite a modern design built between 1980-2010 by looking at the nosecone and style of the aircraft. Also, the blade style "Scimitar" (which is a modern one) will usually paired with a turbo-prop engine. So using an (old-fashioned) radial piston engine looks a bit off to me. Not many people will be picky about it, but just sharing my knowledge. Have fun and appreciate for joining.
@GeneralCorpInc thanks for your understanding
+1beautiful
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I am working on it
+1@Christiant2 you mean the NAVY museum? I will try
+1@IQinventory hope you got to visit soon
+1Nice and fun to fly
+1@Christiant2 It is not a UFO buddy, it was a VTOL craft from the 50s, whih was not successful and stopped at the testing stage
+1@TTL i see
+1this is a notable work. Great job, added to my favorite now
+1nice one buddy
+1@MrCOPTY @Zaineman
+1good luck with the challenge
+1Tag Requests: @Pakkoyan @001 @SpEx
+1@rorrE you can do it if you want to. Since it is very lite, it does not need a long runway, but it does not really a STOL aircraft.
+1@overlord5453 good question. I have to figured it out for some time for that. Now, you got to disable the coalition response on ether one of it
+1very cool, this engine placement looks similar with the Myasishchev-M-50-Nuclear-bomber
+1Congratulations to all the winners! It looks like a nice tight challenge. Sorry I missed it.
+1looks awesome! Good luck with the challenge.
+1Also, thanks to Mod @Seeras
wow, thanks for a nice entry. I love it
+1Honda is going too far with its copyright - that is horrible-
+1It's a great build as usual.
@Trainzo Thank you
+1nice work
+1Good job! spotlighted and upvoted
+1I would love to test the Beter and give the feedback
+1@MrCOPTY awesome
+1@MrCOPTY Yoooo!
+1@IMCI yes
+1@Apollo018362 sure. Please do
+1