@Gbhole A lot of people like to create songs that use multiple instruments using MIDI software because they either don't have access to some of the instruments or an entire band/orchestra. The soundboard is pretty similar in this case, that it allows people without having to buy multiple instruments for their song and having to either learn them all or trying to find some people that just so happen to play these instruments. And like my earlier point, $200 may not sound like a lot to you, but it can still be a pretty hefty price for others. And besides, you are setting aside the effort that it takes to make a song - figuring out the ideas for the song, the way the instrument(s) would be played in particular parts, revising parts to make it sound better with the song, mastering the song, and a lot of other things. I get that you are disappointed with people not playing instruments as much anymore, but you don't have to know how to play an instrument to have a talent for creating songs.
@Warhammer55 That was actually my main inspiration for this plane, the save it was in was called the i-17 because I couldn't think of a name at the time XD
(Wait this plane is was what made you made that one 🥺)
Also this didn't serve in the Pacific War, right? It's Soviet, and the Soviet Union only declared war on Japan less than a month before the end of the war.
Some people just don't happen to have a 1000+ dollar/pound/euro/whatever currency instrument lying around, if they want to use a soundboard, it could just be used as a cheaper alternative. Some people also like music that comes from one. And the whole "doesn't require talent" thing for making a tune sounds pretty BS. If you ask me it's nice that people are discovering their little talents and creating songs using tools that are becoming more accessible to them.
This is also somewhat generalizing... Not all of today's music comes from this certain instrument...
Hellkeska, Little Bugger, Bush Plane, Wasp, Pigpen, Vertigo, Kicking Fish, Twin Prop, Gator 2, Jackhammer, Seaplane (I think that's what it was called)
Does TutorialPlane, Bomber, Drone, and Enemy count?
I support this heavily. My screenshots are really blurry and pixel-y because of the stupid UI in the way that you cannot turn off. I try my best to make them look cool though.
@QingyuZhou Congrats on 200k! I think it's a really nice Mustang build, glad to see it at a mobile friendly part count (Loving the functional interior and the retracts!). It happens to be pretty maneuverable too, quite a few of my own planes have a hard time fighting this thing. Even though I mostly support the PRC, and am part-mainlander, I'm not at all offended, but happy about seeing more ROCAF aircraft on this website! I think that we should just set our political ideologies aside and just build planes and enjoy others builds no matter the origin of country of the aircraft :). (By the way, have you heard of the Chu X-P0 and XP-1? They are indigenous Chinese aircraft from WWII and are probably some of the most obscure aircraft from the war. You should check them out!)
I would like to see that ballast block have capability to make airships by making it buoyant enough. Also would like to see more AI ships/better AI that can use things like turrets on user created ships in case this update is implemented.
So for some reason my plane was not considered a successor even though I used the same “file” for it. Something went wrong when I reuploaded it, would you still accept it?
Here’s the plane
@Mustang51 Oh thanks! I didn’t give this folding wingtips because I couldn’t figure out how to do that when it’s a jet (the wings would be floppier than if it was a slower plane). Thank you though!
@Gbhole A lot of people like to create songs that use multiple instruments using MIDI software because they either don't have access to some of the instruments or an entire band/orchestra. The soundboard is pretty similar in this case, that it allows people without having to buy multiple instruments for their song and having to either learn them all or trying to find some people that just so happen to play these instruments. And like my earlier point, $200 may not sound like a lot to you, but it can still be a pretty hefty price for others. And besides, you are setting aside the effort that it takes to make a song - figuring out the ideas for the song, the way the instrument(s) would be played in particular parts, revising parts to make it sound better with the song, mastering the song, and a lot of other things. I get that you are disappointed with people not playing instruments as much anymore, but you don't have to know how to play an instrument to have a talent for creating songs.
+1I love all the fun little details and an interior in a low part count! You’ve earned an upvote!
@Warhammer55 by the way it makes for nice screenshots! Here’s another
@Warhammer55 That was actually my main inspiration for this plane, the save it was in was called the i-17 because I couldn't think of a name at the time XD
(Wait this plane is was what made you made that one 🥺)
Fridge tank
Also this didn't serve in the Pacific War, right? It's Soviet, and the Soviet Union only declared war on Japan less than a month before the end of the war.
+1@Warhammer55 That's awesome to hear! I had a lot of fun with this little thing as well!
@TitanIncorporated Sure!
Some people just don't happen to have a 1000+ dollar/pound/euro/whatever currency instrument lying around, if they want to use a soundboard, it could just be used as a cheaper alternative. Some people also like music that comes from one. And the whole "doesn't require talent" thing for making a tune sounds pretty BS. If you ask me it's nice that people are discovering their little talents and creating songs using tools that are becoming more accessible to them.
This is also somewhat generalizing... Not all of today's music comes from this certain instrument...
+1I'm pretty sure it was the server host that momentarily went down, bringing the website with it. That was a long outage
+2It could also be omitted for simplicity's sake
@WarHawk95 What are the last three? I never seen those names before
Bf 109 < He 112
+3Hellkeska, Little Bugger, Bush Plane, Wasp, Pigpen, Vertigo, Kicking Fish, Twin Prop, Gator 2, Jackhammer, Seaplane (I think that's what it was called)
Does TutorialPlane, Bomber, Drone, and Enemy count?
XB-15 or a YB-35
I support this heavily. My screenshots are really blurry and pixel-y because of the stupid UI in the way that you cannot turn off. I try my best to make them look cool though.
My birthday is close to yours apparently
@QingyuZhou Congrats on 200k! I think it's a really nice Mustang build, glad to see it at a mobile friendly part count (Loving the functional interior and the retracts!). It happens to be pretty maneuverable too, quite a few of my own planes have a hard time fighting this thing. Even though I mostly support the PRC, and am part-mainlander, I'm not at all offended, but happy about seeing more ROCAF aircraft on this website! I think that we should just set our political ideologies aside and just build planes and enjoy others builds no matter the origin of country of the aircraft :). (By the way, have you heard of the Chu X-P0 and XP-1? They are indigenous Chinese aircraft from WWII and are probably some of the most obscure aircraft from the war. You should check them out!)
+1@NightmareCorporation Like sticking one inside of another with part positioning?
The details on this thing are insane! How did you make it have a louder engine sound?
@RAAF I had it unlisted while preparing it for publishing and I commented on it while it was unlisted
@TitanIncorporated here’s your t h i c c target drone, hope you enjoy it as much as I had building it
Why don't you want any upvotes? Also, where even is that plane?
@TitanIncorporated Hmm ok
What are the results?
@Nademaj I have, actually! The planes in the big dogfight screenshot are Fox E-3's.
da bes plan on sp
This challenge propelled me to silver! Good planes everyone!
@asteroidbook345 @TheMachinist He did rate them, the ratings themselves are in the individual airplane’s comments
I would like to see that ballast block have capability to make airships by making it buoyant enough. Also would like to see more AI ships/better AI that can use things like turrets on user created ships in case this update is implemented.
+1@MSGamezYXZ360 A lot of the fuselage was inspired by the Ki-46 III recon airplane, especially the stepless cockpit. It's such a cool looking plane!
Those are quite the props
Airplanes in movies:
@EternalDarkness How does it float in the air? I really like this airship and I kinda want to build my own.
@Wheatman1 Oh wait, I just realized you are running that challenge, lol
+1Can't wait to see the results of the challenge!
@Wheatman1 this challenge
I made a picture of both of our Cormorants flying together because I was bored
So for some reason my plane was not considered a successor even though I used the same “file” for it. Something went wrong when I reuploaded it, would you still accept it?
+1Here’s the plane
@Mustang51 Oh thanks! I didn’t give this folding wingtips because I couldn’t figure out how to do that when it’s a jet (the wings would be floppier than if it was a slower plane). Thank you though!
So I made this for that WWII Naval Jet Challenge but for some reason it’s not a successor? I used the same cockpit
This helicopter has an incredibly cursed energy to it
+2@Mustang51 Thanks for the review! I am pretty proud of how the canopy went
+1I like the build a lot! The working bomb trapeze is a nice touch!
I too have a plane called the Cormorant, this plane fits it’s name better than mine
+1@Mobius1Cyka Awesome!
@Inviticus same
+1That float retraction mechanism is genius.
+1oops, sorry for saying it was trim, I mixed it up in my head
@TOMJeb117 I usually like to call it the chonker f-35
The pancake of doom!
+3@Hpaccelli Yeah, mixed propulsion aircraft are pretty underrated. I wonder if it counts if it has a propeller/turboprop on it with the jet engine...
@Hpaccelli the Ryan FR is one though, and it had gone into production in March 1945.
+1