@SimplePotato
Basically what Chii means is that the F-22 is going to need beefy landing gears to handle carrier landings. Just compare the F/A-18's landing gear with the F-16's.
@hpgbproductions
Is this with the Conveyor going against it or for it? Because in this scenario the conveyor is running against the plane trying to take off.
@CaptainNoble
The issue is, the conveyor matches the speed of the tires and whatever thrust the engines produce to accelerate the plane will be reflected on the tires cause the tires will spin faster and the moment the the tires spin faster, the conveyor will speed up to counter. So my guess is that the Aircraft will remain static.
@Nitrolord
+1Buzzkill.
@mikomiko
+1Lol, I'd liken it more to the Falken but yeah, Asian Morgan.
@USSRyang
+1Yessir.
@NapoleonPizza
+1Thanks!
I feel like you should have used a better picture for the thumbnail, I didn't think your build was all that until I actually read the description.
+1@theTaboritsky
+1Or maybe fire rises came from me? Lol, I've never heard of that, so if it does look similar then it's probably a coincidence.
@LunarEclipseSP
+1Falken from Temu to be specific.
@SkyJayTheFirst
+1Well yeah, but this has to at least warrant a podium.
@RestlessGalaxies
+1Nah, wouldn't be realistic, I'm making a VTOL craft separately. For now this is gonna be a next gen air superiority fighter.
I wish I could spotlight.
+1I like how smooth you made it.
+1T
+1T
+1@Rjenteissussy
+1Euro fighter?
@Ashdenpaw1
+1It's the mod's permission I need.
@Rjenteissussy
+1Does it have a delta wing?
The Nosferatu?
+1@XEPOH
+1What?
@Timplanes
+1Whoops, that's probably what I was forgetting lol, I'll do an XML update later.
@Pnut
+1Wonderful to know that it achieves what it sets out to do. Thank you!
Pretty damn sleek.
+1@Jd1t4b0m4
+1Well then, you have everything you need.
@blt
+1Well you've been way more active than me. So it's only fair you do.
@LunarEclipseSP
+1In theory, but the flat front of the cybertruck would not help it's case.
@SimplePotato
+1Basically what Chii means is that the F-22 is going to need beefy landing gears to handle carrier landings. Just compare the F/A-18's landing gear with the F-16's.
"I'll put it simple: if you're goin' hard enough left, you'll find yourself turnin' right."
-Hudson Hornet
+1Average SkunkWorks engineer.
+1Hey, is it possible you could extend the challenge a bit?
I have a jet on the way that I already teased.
+1@YarisSedan
+1Yeah! Have been for a little while now.
@PlaneFlightX
+1Yeah that plane might just stay in limbo forever at this rate.
@Dissent3R
+1I guess, but still, people have irl lives, we can't really spend all our gaming time on one build.
There's no way someone is gonna sell a highly classified jet on very public website.
+1VEGA industries.
Owned by me and @Quercon
+1I would also like to know.
+1Funny enough I had this same idea except for the SU-75 but Goddamn you've put mine to shame.
+1Definitely entering this.
+1@Dissent3R
+1Yeah finally!
@Axartar
+1No like A.I images struggles with getting fingers right.
The title of the forum post looks like it was made by A.I lol.
+1@32
+1Normal User who's mature enough to be a moderator.
Your best yet.
+1@hpgbproductions
+1Is this with the Conveyor going against it or for it? Because in this scenario the conveyor is running against the plane trying to take off.
@CaptainNoble
+1The issue is, the conveyor matches the speed of the tires and whatever thrust the engines produce to accelerate the plane will be reflected on the tires cause the tires will spin faster and the moment the the tires spin faster, the conveyor will speed up to counter. So my guess is that the Aircraft will remain static.
Long time no see, welcome back
+1T
@TheCommentaryGuy
+1Yup, something Linus is very familiar with.
@DOYOUMIND
+1By having a kink for punishment disguised as perfectionism.
@Graingy
+1FT yes, I think the VerticalG FT, idk I haven't played around with FT in months.
@32
+1Aw thanks man!
The raycast function also opens up the possibility of stealth.
+1Ay the grim reaper is posting again.
+1