@L3dg3ndary Hey, I have a question. I know that this plane has 8 parts, and got a score of 7 for that, right? I was looking at the successors to it, and saw a jet that had 9 parts, but had a score of 8 for it. That doesn’t make much sense to me.
<<Is this the craft you want me to fly?>>
<<Well, I wouldn’t say “No” it it was a freaking carrier-borne A-10, now would I?>>
And do you play Wings of Duty, WWII by chance?
@Natedog120705 Like anything you’d wanna type so that it can be clicked. An easy one is just put [>>>Link<<<]+(the actual link).
There’s a really cool thing here user Skua made about all the markdown options. I used it to learn about it
@Natedog120705 The only dumb question is the one unasked.
To answer this, it’s pretty simple, actually, once you get it down. It’s [text]+(link). Remove the plus to make it work
@Theflyingtrex Even though it’s not a successor, can I still count my F/A-18E? I also don’t have much time to work on anything else, due to a few more personal projects and schoolwork I’m doing.
@KDS I’m already experimenting on my own, I was just asking for some tips and tricks. Like:
.
How do you keep the strength of the gear up, even when it wants to fold over?
.
Or:
.
How can you make it look as realistic as possible?
.
As of current, I’m retrofitting my F/A-18E with custom landing gear (might post it as an unlisted aircraft when I’m done) as well as working on it for the Saab 37 Vikken and Fictional craft like the CFA-44 and XFA-33
If your profile was a plane, and your progress was a zoom-climb, what plane would it be?
@Blaze77gun that’s okay! If you can, just link the plane you want fixed in the forum post, and tag us!
Happy birthday!
@MTakach That’s what I’d do
@MTakach what I’d do, since it angles up, is just have a bunch of fuselage parts sort of close together to simulate the curve.
Nice!
If possible, I’d like to help, too.
I see you have something against the brits.
Though I have to agree with the most of it. Lol
@Viper3000ad @asteroidbook345 The prize need not apply when good models are made!
Off topic, but that glint off of the cockpit reminds me of the UAV converted aircraft from Ace Combat 7.
Also, that bomb is SWEET.
Ok, sweet! Thanks!@Theflyingtrex
Not a fast craft, but flies really well. Good job!
Lock on intervals for missiles (I.e. a missile can lock from 0°-45° from the nose, as well as 135°-180° from the nose)
@FishMiner THREE hind helicopters strapped to each other in a horrifying mish-mash of soviet engineering?
Count me in, comrade!
@danman12 Same, I’m actually playing right now, so maybe sooner than one might think.
@bfishing nope, iOS. I mean like the propeller engines.
@danman12 I tend to fly realistic whenever I can, but I do play that sometimes. It’s fun!
@bfishing way before. Before modifiable engines too (tho this model has one.)
@AZAMGAMING Thou hath been dethroned.
@L3dg3ndary is it even a plane tho? Cuz dang that’s impressive
@L3dg3ndary Hey, I have a question. I know that this plane has 8 parts, and got a score of 7 for that, right? I was looking at the successors to it, and saw a jet that had 9 parts, but had a score of 8 for it. That doesn’t make much sense to me.
@L3dg3ndary I ain’t even mad, that’s clever.
I. Want. It’s sweet!
@Natedog120705 best of luck, dude! And always feel free to tag me for testing!
<<Is this the craft you want me to fly?>>
<<Well, I wouldn’t say “No” it it was a freaking carrier-borne A-10, now would I?>>
And do you play Wings of Duty, WWII by chance?
@Natedog120705 haha, fair enough. I quite enjoy messing with this thing. Good job!
Would have been useful in the testing phase
*laughs in exploded guns *
@Natedog120705 Like anything you’d wanna type so that it can be clicked. An easy one is just put [>>>Link<<<]+(the actual link).
There’s a really cool thing here user Skua made about all the markdown options. I used it to learn about it
@Natedog120705 The only dumb question is the one unasked.
To answer this, it’s pretty simple, actually, once you get it down. It’s [text]+(link). Remove the plus to make it work
@Jim1the1Squid If you can pull it off, I’ll definitely tag you for it. Just don’t overwork or frustrate yourself trying to figure it out.
@Jim1the1Squid It’s okay, dude.
Hey, it works now! Nice job! And no problem! Glad you fixed the issue of the bullet snag for the most part.
@Theflyingtrex Even though it’s not a successor, can I still count my F/A-18E? I also don’t have much time to work on anything else, due to a few more personal projects and schoolwork I’m doing.
@jamesPLANESii ok, cool. Thanks for the reply and tips!
@jamesPLANESii @KDS would you guys like to be tagged in a build to test out the custom gear?
@jamesPLANESii Ok, thanks!
@jamesPLANESii oh s**t, seriously?!
Why haven’t I thought of this sooner?!
I thought this was in-game using that mod everyone talks about!
Idk... feels like it needs more bomb.
Ah shoot, it’s the 3rd and I just learned about this.
@KDS I’m already experimenting on my own, I was just asking for some tips and tricks. Like:
.
How do you keep the strength of the gear up, even when it wants to fold over?
.
Or:
.
How can you make it look as realistic as possible?
.
As of current, I’m retrofitting my F/A-18E with custom landing gear (might post it as an unlisted aircraft when I’m done) as well as working on it for the Saab 37 Vikken and Fictional craft like the CFA-44 and XFA-33
@bfishing Yessir, that they were. Crazy how the times change, eh?
@Zoomzoom999 Society is confusing, isn’t it, my duck friend?
How about the Jetstream?
@Jim1the1Squid dang. It was worth a shot.
@Jim1the1Squid can you XML modify stuff?
@belugasub y-yes Sir!
@Aeromen dang.
But I’m also gonna be using it for my own AAM. It’s on one of my builds if I can give that spoiler away.
@Jim1the1Squid maaaaaaaaybe
Gone, but not forgotten...
Mainly because better versions exist now.