@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Yeah, that’s fine, but let’s make sure to get explicit permission before hand.
(I give you my permission to do it on any of my posts now)
I like them, but only when it is used correctly. A PEA should not be just an excuse to do less work. Some people do this, but I hate that type of “PEA”
I think a PEA should actually be just that. Part efficient. Use parts efficiently, but that does not mean just be lazy. IMO, this is the problem with PEA. New players can just use them as an excuse to make a “high quality” plane while actually just being lazy.
They can be great, but only when people actually put work into them. This type is the only type I consider a true PEA, so yes, I love PEA. However, some people use PEA on things that should not be considered PEA, and this, I hate.
@Graingy
No. Flaps were fine. I just hate backwards flaps, that also go above the wing. I understand the weapons things, it just seemed like a bit to few for my trigger happy self.
@WinsWings
Lol, that would be funny. I doubt it though, as the one he gave me is actually quite nice, and I doubt he wants to buy another ipad already.
Have you tried using a different web browser, such as safari or google? I have never used opera gx, so that may be the problem. When you click the download button, does a screen pop up with the code? Or does nothjng happen?
The only time I have ever had roll reverse, is fairly recently, working on my xb-70. I made the real wings much smaller to fit inside the fuselage wings, but forgot to set them to wing-2 instead of wing-3, so they were swinging all over the place, and making roll reverse.
Idk about the first one. However, the second one is called wingtip stall. Its fairly easy to fix, just reduce the control surface for pitch. (Or, reduce its angle in overload.)
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer
I am still scared.
(I would help, but I havr never make a walker, so I would probably hurt more than help.)
Cool concept. I wonder how it will fly…
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Yeah, that’s fine, but let’s make sure to get explicit permission before hand.
(I give you my permission to do it on any of my posts now)
Shiny!
+1Amphibious combat vehicle sounds fun. P
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer
A plane with legs? This reminds me of wasp woman.
I ask.
WHY?
+1@Graingy
+1He must use his new vocab words!
I am afraid of this.
I like them, but only when it is used correctly. A PEA should not be just an excuse to do less work. Some people do this, but I hate that type of “PEA”
+2I think a PEA should actually be just that. Part efficient. Use parts efficiently, but that does not mean just be lazy. IMO, this is the problem with PEA. New players can just use them as an excuse to make a “high quality” plane while actually just being lazy.
They can be great, but only when people actually put work into them. This type is the only type I consider a true PEA, so yes, I love PEA. However, some people use PEA on things that should not be considered PEA, and this, I hate.
@Graingy
No. Flaps were fine. I just hate backwards flaps, that also go above the wing. I understand the weapons things, it just seemed like a bit to few for my trigger happy self.
@Graingy
Absolutely no idea. However, you could try adding more lift, by setting the liftScale to 1.5 or 2. Idk just an idea.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
You tagged yourself lol.
@Graingy
lol. You bad sand.
@GeneralCorpInc
+1Yep, out. Remind me later, and I will.
@GeneralCorpInc
+1Sure, I may be out though. If I am, I will later.
Armadillo lol.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Thanks.
@theNoobCountry2withM1911
Did you figure it out?
@theNoobCountry2withM1911
In the rotators that control the rear wings.
Very nice!
You may have disabled popups, so I suggest trying a different browser first, and then other stuff.
@TalonTheCRTguy
Yeah, and that is fine, I am just trying to avoid more of the needless comments.
@WinsWings
Ik lol
@WinsWings
+1Lol, that would be funny. I doubt it though, as the one he gave me is actually quite nice, and I doubt he wants to buy another ipad already.
@WinsWings
+1The great philosopher has spoken ;)
@Weaponcollection
Agh!!!
@WinsWings
Lol, thats backwards!
Have you tried using a different web browser, such as safari or google? I have never used opera gx, so that may be the problem. When you click the download button, does a screen pop up with the code? Or does nothjng happen?
@theNoobCountry2withM1911
Lol, I was tagged here. I did not ever read the title. Let me see this then.
@WinsWings
+1Nice!
@TheultimatePlaneLover
Could you tag a couple of the others pls? I dont remember all their long usernames ;)
Agh! He is gonna eat me!
T
Hi
Hi
Hi
+1Hi@Rjenteissussy
+2Lol. Thats what upvotes do.
@DLAERODYNAMIC
Read this
@Rjenteissussy
+1Glad to help!
@HazerzIsBack
+1No longer…
Why all the rickrolls lol?
@Rjenteissussy
He was temp banned. It was related to the “andrewREDACTED” incident.
Hmm. Let me see if I can, rush time.
+1Oh wait, that was actually really cool!
@Majakalona
+1Lol. I did not realize strikes transferred, as well as bans. But an “osama flight simulator”
Was that really wise lol?
Hmm. Very cube.
@Majakalona
+1Lol.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1Great.
The only time I have ever had roll reverse, is fairly recently, working on my xb-70. I made the real wings much smaller to fit inside the fuselage wings, but forgot to set them to wing-2 instead of wing-3, so they were swinging all over the place, and making roll reverse.
Idk about the first one. However, the second one is called wingtip stall. Its fairly easy to fix, just reduce the control surface for pitch. (Or, reduce its angle in overload.)
+1@Graingy
+2True.
Scary.