@Seeras @EternalDarkness @Squirrel
This post (and its uploader) has violated these articles in the rules: Politics and Religion: Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate. Be kind: No hate speech. You will be banned immediately. No sexually suggestive content or foul language: We are not going to moderate every curse word, but please try to keep it clean.
Following this article: Be courteous if you find a violation of this rule. New players may not be aware, so just link them to the rules and tag a moderator., I tag you.
@Zokowi
J-20 and MiG 1.44 has large difference.
To start with MiG 1.44 has belly air intake with variable geometry ramps. J-20 is side-mounted DSI intake.
Then, about the canards. MiG 1.44's canard is mounted much higher than the main wing. On the other hand, J-20's canard is mounted on the same level of the main wing. This is a very large difference in aerodynamics because calculating the vortex generation of a canard is very complicated.
Base on these, I don't think the China can get any useful imformation from MiG 1.44 data. If they really has the data in the first place.
Two things look similiar doesn't directly mean they copy each other. Like F-15 and MiG-25.
@asteroidbook345 Lmao my friend. It's even not a plane. The start of this drama is just a PLAAF roundel. And this guy, jumped out and bring in Sino-Indian border conflict topics and Rafale. Also he developed a new theory: Because of J-20, China is aggersive.
@BoganBoganTheWoman Yes, peace, peace is everything. As Homo sapiens sapiens all I want is human could develop themselves better than they are and keep.
Let's talk about. Peacefully talk. This is not going to debate, these questions are what I want to ask you. Please answer.
1. How did you come to the conclusion that "China is aggressive" from a J-20 aircraft?
2. Why put Rafale and Sino-Indian Border conflict topic under just a PLAAF roundel?
3. Who told you J-20 came from F-117 debris?
4. Why J-20 post = Propaganda?
5. If J-20 post = propaganda as you said, can I consider these Rafale posts and Mirage posts as French propaganda?
. coughs. discalmer: no offence to France.
@SPairforce It's acturally pretty good! But if you could do some XML and reduce that drag point count will be better.
Great if have a better thumbnail!
@EternalDarkness true eh. =_=
but why dont make the rules page pops up when creating an account... bruh i don't think people will check it but at lease... it pops. doesn't like now
a terrible fact that I didn't know there's a rule page til july '19 lol
Why add rocket pods to the wingtip? F-16's wingtip could only hold an AIM-120 lol.
Here's my advices about ground attack payload
First you should at least get 2 air-air missiles. Why? First the wingtip could only hold them and in case of an enemy aerial target appears and there's no friendly A-S jets nearby, you're gonna deal with it with a CAS. A missile will be definitely a great tool you use to defend yourself.
Second you should add more rocket pods... Two rocket pods each pylon will be ok.
Dont forget to add activation groups to weapons ;) these weapons without activation groups makes lots of trouble in multiplayer session.
Tags:
@Aarons123
@Inuyasha8215
@CodenameMorgan
yeet
the cobra.
@asteroidbook345 today is the celebration day of the PLA in China
Nice battleship
time teller
yeah. clear enough.
Your helicopters are great
@ollielebanania ok
Could you do a Mirage? Mirage III or M2K Thankx
Great
@Empergyd Urwelcome
@painworkshop Got it
Goood
these ERA's are fit for urban warfare right?
WOW.
JUST
WOW.
@GRECHAN lol
@Aarons123 lol
@Aarons123 The question's isn't for you
You misunderstanded.
Medpack
@Seeras @EternalDarkness @Squirrel
This post (and its uploader) has violated these articles in the rules:
Politics and Religion:
Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate.
Be kind:
No hate speech. You will be banned immediately.
No sexually suggestive content or foul language:
We are not going to moderate every curse word, but please try to keep it clean.
Following this article: Be courteous if you find a violation of this rule. New players may not be aware, so just link them to the rules and tag a moderator., I tag you.
@Frenchguyn666 lmao.
@asteroidbook345 that's enough. let's stay away from this topic... that's really toxic.
@Sm1ley_FaCe lol ok
@asteroidbook345 lol
@Zokowi
J-20 and MiG 1.44 has large difference.
To start with MiG 1.44 has belly air intake with variable geometry ramps. J-20 is side-mounted DSI intake.
Then, about the canards. MiG 1.44's canard is mounted much higher than the main wing. On the other hand, J-20's canard is mounted on the same level of the main wing. This is a very large difference in aerodynamics because calculating the vortex generation of a canard is very complicated.
Base on these, I don't think the China can get any useful imformation from MiG 1.44 data. If they really has the data in the first place.
Two things look similiar doesn't directly mean they copy each other. Like F-15 and MiG-25.
@asteroidbook345 Lmao my friend. It's even not a plane. The start of this drama is just a PLAAF roundel. And this guy, jumped out and bring in Sino-Indian border conflict topics and Rafale. Also he developed a new theory: Because of J-20, China is aggersive.
@BoganBoganTheWoman Yes, peace, peace is everything.
As Homo sapiens sapiens all I want is human could develop themselves better than they are and keep.
Let's talk about. Peacefully talk. This is not going to debate, these questions are what I want to ask you. Please answer.
1. How did you come to the conclusion that "China is aggressive" from a J-20 aircraft?
2. Why put Rafale and Sino-Indian Border conflict topic under just a PLAAF roundel?
3. Who told you J-20 came from F-117 debris?
4. Why J-20 post = Propaganda?
5. If J-20 post = propaganda as you said, can I consider these Rafale posts and Mirage posts as French propaganda?
.
coughs.
discalmer: no offence to France.
Finally, Why starting this drama?
321
lmao
lol
agh chemical
@831143 你这迫真机翻把我看笑了。。如果有些单位名称不知道的话可以去百度一下千万不要机翻啊喂=_=
Is the cockpit acturally yours? I don't think so
很有精神！
stop copying others crafts
ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
DC-3 yes
First
owo
Wow, i didn't got any farmers on this site before
10/10
@SPairforce It's acturally pretty good! But if you could do some XML and reduce that drag point count will be better.
Great if have a better thumbnail!
@EternalDarkness eh ok =_=
@EternalDarkness true eh. =_=
but why dont make the rules page pops up when creating an account... bruh i don't think people will check it but at lease... it pops. doesn't like now
a terrible fact that I didn't know there's a rule page til july '19 lol
@Nukeit1234 lol then
@50CalChicken He made a loadout variant of my F-16 lol
Why add rocket pods to the wingtip? F-16's wingtip could only hold an AIM-120 lol.
Here's my advices about ground attack payload
First you should at least get 2 air-air missiles. Why? First the wingtip could only hold them and in case of an enemy aerial target appears and there's no friendly A-S jets nearby, you're gonna deal with it with a CAS. A missile will be definitely a great tool you use to defend yourself.
Second you should add more rocket pods... Two rocket pods each pylon will be ok.
Dont forget to add activation groups to weapons ;) these weapons without activation groups makes lots of trouble in multiplayer session.
Dang you got me
Acturally became hungry
@AerialFighterSnakes Lol
Glad that I made you laughed XD
name
T
Great