@Graingy No.
@XEPOH Are you entirely unfamiliar with the concept of a second set of eyes? I am quite confident with what I’ve built and any flaws I’ve encountered I consider to be acceptable within the margins of its type. I do not need someone to fix it, I need a second opinion on whether others consider it pleasant to fly, and if there’s any finer visual details I could add that I overlooked. If you’re going to fling accusations that I am wholly dependent on others to make an adequate aircraft, do it elsewhere. Or, preferably, not at all.
I opted for the boring but functional activation group route. If Eject=1 then ActivateX.
On a related note, anybody recall how to make something activate only if two activation groups are active?
@TechCreator Not what I asked for. I’m asking for a second pair of eyes and an opinion on experience, not modifications.
@TechCreator damperMultiplier. That has a known solution, if not a great one.
Likewise, I cannot tell where the Acro input connects.
@Rjenteissussy TVC?
Would this be akin to... whatever the VR Pigpen does?
I'm afraid not.
@JSTQ I am extremely annoyed that did not work when I tried it.
@V Despicable Profanity
Nose may be a tad large, eh?
@Jaspy190 I am fine, thanks.
@JSTQ Eject is an input. No custom variables (in the sense of the dedicated variable menu) were used.
@JSTQ What?
@Jaspy190 Grain would want to eat it.
@MonsNotTheMonster Never happened in my experience. If the editor is reloaded, perhaps, but not spontaneously on its own.
@Graingy I was right.
I have a theory.
@Graingy.
That is ugly.
@Graingy No.
@Graingy For someone who cannot eat you are shockingly food-motivated.
You're leaving your class. Social class.
Welcome to the slums.
Economic woes have you out of a home?
@MonsNotTheMonster What do you mean? Returns after what?
That's not how you play War Thunder.
Throw it sideways, not forwards.
Find the part connected to the cockpit, move it to X 0.0000 with connected parts move on.
Then move the cockpit to X 0.0000 after it.
@Boeing727200F How would we not be trustworthy?
@Boeing727200F Denied.
@Boeing727200F I suppose so, so long as you can meet requirements.
@Boeing727200F I beg your pardon?
@Graingy Which are you, pot or kettle?
@CaptainBrayden I will provide a link later. Thank you.
@XEPOH You accused me of needing someone else to “fix my crafts” when I asked for testers.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff This is a pile of intentionally crude imitation and a healthy serving of filters.
@Graingy No.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff I… I am the designer? I am looking for test pilots, however, if you’d check my previous forum.
@Graingy No.
@XEPOH Are you entirely unfamiliar with the concept of a second set of eyes? I am quite confident with what I’ve built and any flaws I’ve encountered I consider to be acceptable within the margins of its type. I do not need someone to fix it, I need a second opinion on whether others consider it pleasant to fly, and if there’s any finer visual details I could add that I overlooked. If you’re going to fling accusations that I am wholly dependent on others to make an adequate aircraft, do it elsewhere. Or, preferably, not at all.
@Graingy No.
???
To clarify: No, this is not, in itself, a combat aircraft.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff
@GuyWhoBuildStuff
Got something working. Excessively complicated, probably, but it works.
I opted for the boring but functional activation group route. If Eject=1 then ActivateX.
On a related note, anybody recall how to make something activate only if two activation groups are active?
@BagelPlane Unfortunate.
Read this.
Minecraft Classic is free with a keyboard.
I'm not sure what I'm looking at.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff That hurts to look at.
@BagelPlane At an arbitrary speed? Seems odd.
Wetted area means what?
@YarisHatchback I may have overdone it a bit.
All in the name of being eye-catching.
@JBPAviation It's hard plastic.
Soviet?