@Graingy No.
@XEPOH Are you entirely unfamiliar with the concept of a second set of eyes? I am quite confident with what I’ve built and any flaws I’ve encountered I consider to be acceptable within the margins of its type. I do not need someone to fix it, I need a second opinion on whether others consider it pleasant to fly, and if there’s any finer visual details I could add that I overlooked. If you’re going to fling accusations that I am wholly dependent on others to make an adequate aircraft, do it elsewhere. Or, preferably, not at all.
I opted for the boring but functional activation group route. If Eject=1 then ActivateX.
On a related note, anybody recall how to make something activate only if two activation groups are active?
Of course, any aircraft can always be made larger simply by making it longer. There are absolutely not problems or limitations to this.
I still cannot fathom what this aircraft is actually for…
The Goliath got a remodel, I see.
It’s a lot shinier now.
A Canuck, eh?
Interesting.
@Trainz448 Hyperlinks can be created as [Text](Link)
@TechCreator Not what I asked for. I’m asking for a second pair of eyes and an opinion on experience, not modifications.
@TechCreator damperMultiplier. That has a known solution, if not a great one.
Likewise, I cannot tell where the Acro input connects.
@Rjenteissussy TVC?
Would this be akin to... whatever the VR Pigpen does?
I'm afraid not.
@JSTQ I am extremely annoyed that did not work when I tried it.
@V Despicable Profanity
Nose may be a tad large, eh?
@Jaspy190 I am fine, thanks.
@JSTQ Eject is an input. No custom variables (in the sense of the dedicated variable menu) were used.
@JSTQ What?
@Jaspy190 Grain would want to eat it.
@MonsNotTheMonster Never happened in my experience. If the editor is reloaded, perhaps, but not spontaneously on its own.
@Graingy I was right.
I have a theory.
@Graingy.
That is ugly.
@Graingy No.
@Graingy For someone who cannot eat you are shockingly food-motivated.
You're leaving your class. Social class.
Welcome to the slums.
Economic woes have you out of a home?
@MonsNotTheMonster What do you mean? Returns after what?
That's not how you play War Thunder.
Throw it sideways, not forwards.
Find the part connected to the cockpit, move it to X 0.0000 with connected parts move on.
Then move the cockpit to X 0.0000 after it.
@Boeing727200F How would we not be trustworthy?
@Boeing727200F Denied.
@Boeing727200F I suppose so, so long as you can meet requirements.
@Boeing727200F I beg your pardon?
@Graingy Which are you, pot or kettle?
@CaptainBrayden I will provide a link later. Thank you.
@XEPOH You accused me of needing someone else to “fix my crafts” when I asked for testers.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff This is a pile of intentionally crude imitation and a healthy serving of filters.
@Graingy No.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff I… I am the designer? I am looking for test pilots, however, if you’d check my previous forum.
@Graingy No.
@XEPOH Are you entirely unfamiliar with the concept of a second set of eyes? I am quite confident with what I’ve built and any flaws I’ve encountered I consider to be acceptable within the margins of its type. I do not need someone to fix it, I need a second opinion on whether others consider it pleasant to fly, and if there’s any finer visual details I could add that I overlooked. If you’re going to fling accusations that I am wholly dependent on others to make an adequate aircraft, do it elsewhere. Or, preferably, not at all.
@Graingy No.
???
To clarify: No, this is not, in itself, a combat aircraft.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff
@GuyWhoBuildStuff
Got something working. Excessively complicated, probably, but it works.
I opted for the boring but functional activation group route. If Eject=1 then ActivateX.
On a related note, anybody recall how to make something activate only if two activation groups are active?
@BagelPlane Unfortunate.
Read this.
Minecraft Classic is free with a keyboard.
I'm not sure what I'm looking at.