@ilovepatatos we don’t have enough FT or control inputs to simulate overheating engines (also that would be annoying to do)
I’d honestly recommend not doing that... I wanted to mention it but I knew it wasn’t easily possible
Even if it was having overheat will be annoying to fly with, I’d rather it stay like it is
@WormWithLegs no not necessarily.
With the unity engine SP uses it’s not exactly how you’d think it is. I’m not good at explaining that so I’ll let him handle it
@TriStar I made a variation of this not too long ago with the best sounds you can mockup in this game, which includes the “buzzsaw” sound. I may make a video on it sooner or later
As Bogdan stated. The F-35 is much worse than most. All it does is perform slow, can’t go as fast as it should be, payload is mediocre, and it’s way too expensive. You should be looking at that instead of acting like a shill. I’m sorry for the language (even though it’s not a curseword)
@ThatOneThiccPlaneStealer suffer, plebeian
I have a mobile device that can run 2k parts so “mobile friendly” is null :]
You know what that last piece may be just an inlet unfortunately
@WNP78 this is probably gonna get annoying so you might as well pin the answer.
I’m asking this for all,
respectfullybut how long is the ETA on the update?Like I made a forum for, nothing is more desperately required than optimization. They legit threw it out the window.
@Rsouissi I... don’t think I asked you lol
Could you possibly make the UH/MH-60L DAP late variant too?
@ilovepatatos we don’t have enough FT or control inputs to simulate overheating engines (also that would be annoying to do)
I’d honestly recommend not doing that... I wanted to mention it but I knew it wasn’t easily possible
Even if it was having overheat will be annoying to fly with, I’d rather it stay like it is
@Rsouissi I’d rather not...
I like the normal exhaust, plus the Med Evac version is sometimes literally UH-60A’s (I.E.: some in Wisconsin)
@WormWithLegs no not necessarily.
With the unity engine SP uses it’s not exactly how you’d think it is. I’m not good at explaining that so I’ll let him handle it
Oh my god that’s so prettyyyyy
The main landinggear could look so much better but it is smooth asf when landing, I really dig this
awesome to hear, can’t wait to see it finished.
@WIZARD2017 That might be true, I can see that.
Got a question, are you going to make the turrets have auto-targeting FunkyTrees?
@WIZARD2017 the racks have 4 500’s in a row in close proximity.
Here’s one of the bombay checks
You can use the diagram at the beginning of this post as a reference
@WIZARD2017 asked some friends who know more about it, they say it carry’s 32 according to the Bombay size
@Awalters38 uh... I’d rather 420 but ok
@ACEPILOT109 @JuanNotAnAlt they added more tag options if you didn’t notice.
New tag: Highly detailed cockpits and now you have more tag slots
Honestly I can’t suggest for you man, they’re all so unique.
Good luck on it tho
I saw so many of these at EAA a few days ago, they’re so adorable lmao
Ooh. I kinda wish there was a little more detail to it, so it looks right but this is as good as it’ll get I guess.
@Tydapro impossible
The UI in SR2 will me and everyone cry.
Plus that’s just a bad idea
Welcome back.
@TriStar I made a variation of this not too long ago with the best sounds you can mockup in this game, which includes the “buzzsaw” sound. I may make a video on it sooner or later
Ok I immediately lost interest after noticing the Vertical stab yaw is inverted and the controls are screwed.
I like the effort that was put into detail, but unfortunately this won’t earn my upvote or spotlight. Sorry
I definitely want to see this. T
laughs in “broken missiles”
1 interceptor and you’re dead :D
Honestly am really interested in seeing how good this is.
Dude really said “I’m browsing the Ching side of Hen Hon Chi” (don’t hurt me it’s a joke)
I’ll probably read this back tomorrow and regret saying this. It’s 2:47 AM rn
@PlayerkGaming is ok, I understand the concern
@BMilan ty! lol
@BMilan Since you’ve kicked off PWE, is it possible you could do a carrier at one point?
Weird request but can you make the HMS Glorious or the USS Yorktown at some point?
@OtakuNekoToT ... I ain’t good at FT lmao. Good luck on finding how tho
@OtakuNekoToT Bit of missed details, the MK82SE (which is the one with the drag fins, called the Snakeye ) has 4 fins on each bomb, not 2.
@KnightOfRen it’s an image
Yayyyyyy the witch is dead!
@Dathcha that’d make it look skinny
@Tookan with how some of them are very high parts he has to in order to download them. Don’t go on a witch-hunt for the love of god
Besides, they’re producing an 80’s classic. So ofc they’d charge higher
@F104Deathtrap the only failure I see is the failure to realize that everyone is disagreeing. You need to notice that.
I’m trying to stay calm here.
As Bogdan stated. The F-35 is much worse than most. All it does is perform slow, can’t go as fast as it should be, payload is mediocre, and it’s way too expensive. You should be looking at that instead of acting like a shill. I’m sorry for the language (even though it’s not a curseword)
This ship looks fantastic. The performance could be better but it’s simple, looks great, has nice lighting, perfect
Jesus that’s...
A lot of parts
@Tookan well I think the 57’s had upgrades later in the war for them. Either way, the crew would try to stabilize it manually
I big stupid
I retract my comment lmao
@Nerfaddict laughs in Northwest USA
I don’t live there actually but I have friends let’s say...
@Bluenose o...k?
Sadge. You will be missed.
But, will you be around if SP2 comes into existence?
@PapaWii guns don’t work because game doodoo code
@ACEPILOT109 I thought the server was down?
@MintLynx so wait, is the SPMC server down too? (I thought someone said that existed at one point)