198k SledDriver Comments

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @Spectre2520 Not as far as I know. I've hit it with 200 Boom 50s to no effect.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @NicePlanes Thank you. As far as I'm concerned, it's good to not be too good at expressing emotion.

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @ChickenMcNuggets007 The differences are caused by drag. If you keep the drag points about the same as the demo aircraft, it will fly the same. It's also important not to add mass to the build.

  • Sentinel 6.7 years ago

    @Spectre2520 I just happened to reload the page just as you posted. Couple of things, yaw is reversed and the landing gear are too far back.

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @REXTHEDINO Hmm, I'll think about it.

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    Thanks, @REXTHEDINO, glad to hear that.

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @ChickenMcNuggets007 Because you announced that your account was now live, that's all.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot thanks

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    Thanks, @Freerider2142

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @Nzlcafa I don't think you'll be able to import curves from any other software. The Y-value defines the increment in slope for each block. So if you have:

    0,0.25;1,-0.005;51,0;60,-0.0002;

    This translates to:

    • at the zeroth point, the slope should be 0.25;
    • from the next point until the 50th point, the slope should decrease by 0.005 for each successive block;
    • at the 51st point, stop changing the slope;
    • starting at point 60, decrement the slope by 0.0002.

    If, instead of copying and pasting the control points above in one go, you type them in manually, you'll be able to grasp how it works. A positive number gives you a line curving upwards; a negative number gives you a line curving downwards.

    The thickness of each block is automatically determined by the Number of segments and y-Scale fields. If you set the y-Scale to 100 and the number of segments to 400, each block will be 0.25 units thick. Use thicker blocks for shallow curves, and thinner blocks for sharper curves.

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @ChickenMcNuggets007 What happened, did you get banned?

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    Thanks, @AWESOMENESS360

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    Thanks, @Spectre2520

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @DeathStalker627 Well, a sci-fi spacecraft, anyway.

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    Thanks, @Redvis

  • Cuneus II 6.7 years ago

    @ColonelStriker The perfect Valentine's Day.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @ViciousTNT I have made plenty of low part count builds. Hundreds of them. If people really wanted those, they would upvote them a lot more. But the same people who complain that a build has too many parts, fail to upvote the low part count versions. So why should I care?

  • Smooth Shape Generator 6.7 years ago

    @Nzlcafa Yeah, I don't know why they haven't done that already. Although if most of the user base is on mobile devices, that would explain it.

  • Vector 6.7 years ago

    @Nzlcafa Nice. I've always been interested in architecture.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @Spectre2520 You really think I'm that dumb?

  • Vector 6.7 years ago

    @Nzlcafa Pretty much. Are you a 3D modeler?

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    Thanks, @BaconRoll

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @Spectre2520 Yes, 120 of them to be exact.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @ViciousTNT Smooth in looks, smooth in flight.

  • Vector 6.7 years ago

    @Nzlcafa Thanks. There's no plugin, it's a browser-based application. Instructions here.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    Thanks, @AWESOMENESS360, glad you like it. Also, check out the way the cockpit fairing smoothly blends into the vertical stabilizer.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @CptJacobson Which one?

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @CptJacobson Likewise. Haven't seen you around in a while.

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    Merci, @grizzlitn. What do you think of the afterburner?

  • Wolfhound 6.7 years ago

    @Hexcorpz Well, I based it off the MiG-21, but the ships in Destiny 2 look pretty cool.

  • Ribald 6.7 years ago

    I like the bawdy on this one.

  • USSR-71 Blyatbird 6.7 years ago

    @suvorov Well, "blyat" is the only Russian cuss word I know...

  • USSR-71 Blyatbird 6.7 years ago

    @CookieDefender Spasiba, comrade. Glad you like.

  • XB-70 Valkyrie mobile friendly 6.7 years ago

    @Bones11226 Well, you could try this build or this one. They have much lower part counts.

  • XB-70 Valkyrie 6.7 years ago

    @Stingray Yeah, company workstations and fun are mutually exclusive. Personally, I prefer a massive desktop workstation with the largest/highest resolution monitor I can find, mechanical keyboard, a full-tower case with plenty of room for upgrades, and a sound system to match. But I understand portability is a requirement for some. There are "desktop replacement" gaming laptops around, even ones with full-sized mechanical keyboards. Expect a fair dent in the bank account with one of those, though.

    Securing your new PC is the tedious (and important) part, I agree. I recommend limiting the C: partition to something like 50 GB, and only installing Windows and some core apps on it (no large apps or data). That way you can backup to a reasonably-sized image and restore your PC's last good state in minutes if you ever have to reinstall.

    I can also recommend disabling auto-update ("download updates in background, ask to install" option). There's a history of auto updates bricking systems (occasionally, but once is too often with that kind of thing).

  • An update on the Avion III and other things. 6.7 years ago

    @ThePrototype Hmm I don't get it, but I guess without a flow visualization experiment we'll never know.

  • An update on the Avion III and other things. 6.7 years ago

    @ThePrototype I'm assuming the roll happens because the wingtip that's drooped causes the wing on that side to have less lift?

  • An update on the Avion III and other things. 6.7 years ago

    @ThePrototype Cool. Does your Avion also roll when you droop a wingtip?

  • Mechanical Soapbox car 6.7 years ago

    @ThePrototype Look forward to seeing the more advanced version.

  • XB-70 Valkyrie 6.7 years ago

    @Stingray I can recommend it. PCs make the best gadgets.

  • XB-70 Valkyrie 6.7 years ago

    @Stingray I'm very glad to hear that. I suppose it's somewhat realistic that flying with the gear partially down affects handling :)

    Ideal landing speed is about 150 mph, it lands quite well at that speed.

    That's a lot of devices... you like your gadgets, huh?

  • Mirage 2000 6.7 years ago

    @Sarpanitu Scripts like mine don't come out of ignorance... Keep telling yourself whatever helps you sleep at night.

    And that's about as much time as I have to waste on lowlifes like you. You are now blocked. Have a nice life :)

  • USSR-71 Blyatbird 6.7 years ago

    @Akali I find the colours in SP to be too bland and muddy, so I wrote some custom shaders to make them more vivid and increase the contrast a bit.

  • Mirage 2000 6.7 years ago

    @Sarpanitu

    Your criticism about "one construction" method is about as valid as criticizing an architect for building all his skyscrapers out of concrete. If I've developed a better construction method, why would I not use it for everything?

    no moving parts, no landing gear

    Not true.

    no scale in mind

    I've explained many times why I build big. If you can't understand it, that's your problem.

    even though I was already aware of what an insufferable douchebag you are

    If you were so aware, why did you use my work? Where's your integrity?

    whilst depending entirely on my ONE pathetic gimmick

    I have at least a dozen innovations in SimplePlanes, thus far unmatched. I have over 400 largely unique designs, that perform their functions exceedingly well. What do you have? A few cockpits, and a few mediocre planes. If my work counts as one gimmick, yours counts for about... 0.05?

    I could get insane points if I JUST built cockpits,

    That's what it comes down to for you and your buddies, doesn't it? It's all about points. Forget fun, forget creativity, it's all about points. Well then, if points are so important to you, then build cockpits. Let's see you build 400 unique cockpits.

    You done yet? You should be.

    I'm just getting started, boyo. Meanwhile, you feeling dumb yet? You should be. :)

  • XB-70 Valkyrie 6.7 years ago

    @Stingray OK, which device(s) does auto-roll happen on?

  • XB-70 Valkyrie 6.7 years ago

    @Stingray Heavy-pitch mode is only meant to be used up to 1000 mph, for high-G turns, landings, and slow flight. Enabling afterburner (AG1) and AG2 together will result in very violent turns.

    I'm not sure why handling should be different on mobiles than on desktops -- with a keyboard, every control input is either 1, 0, or -1. On mobiles, I believe it can be any number in that range, but the range is still -1 to 1. So max pitch input on desktop should have the same effect as it does on mobile.

    Another thing, have you ever noticed auto-roll on any of my builds?

  • XB-70 Valkyrie 6.7 years ago

    @Stingray Thanks for the feedback, every bit helps. To increase pitch authority, you need to activate AG2 -- or do you mean you'd like the pitch to be even stronger than that?

  • USSR-71 Blyatbird 6.7 years ago

    @huaishushu2333333 It means "damn" in Russian, more or less.

  • USSR-71 Blyatbird 6.7 years ago

    @AWESOMENESS360 Da, comrade. Strong like bull, clever like tractor.

  • USSR-71 Blyatbird 6.7 years ago

    @Yeagerskibbiers No, why?