Profile image

XB-70 Valkyrie mobile friendly

197k SledDriver  5.5 years ago
466 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on SledDriver's XB-70 Valkyrie

Low-part-count version. It has no rotators, so flight performance is not degraded. The windshield ramp and drooping wingtips are implemented using control surfaces, so they don't affect handling at all. A downside (or upside, depending on your point of view) is that the wingtips can also be folded upwards with VTOL up.

Controls

  • Custom camera 1: Gun camera view
  • AG1: Afterburner
  • AG2: High agility mode
  • FireGuns: Fire plasma cannons
  • VTOL down: Supersonic configuration
  • VTOL up/down rapidly: Ornithopter configuration

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor XB-70 Valkyrie
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 114.9ft (35.0m)
  • Length 192.9ft (58.8m)
  • Height 22.7ft (6.9m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 217,244lbs (98,540kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.62
  • Wing Loading 21.2lbs/ft2 (103.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 10,252.4ft2 (952.5m2)
  • Drag Points 56769

Parts

  • Number of Parts 390
  • Control Surfaces 20
  • Performance Cost 1,358
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Phantom1 Look here for really low part count builds.

    5.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,637 Phantom1

    Aw i can run it then :(

    5.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Phantom1 No lower. No more.

    5.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,637 Phantom1

    Lower more

    5.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Bones11226 Well, you could try this build or this one. They have much lower part counts.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thx for making it mobile friendly but it’s a little laggy by the ground

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Strikefighter04 Oh, part count wasn't the primary reason I removed the gear -- the main gear are only 25 parts each. I removed them because they have rotators, which make heavy builds wobbly in flight. Also, if you tested the original, you might have noticed that the gear clips through the body during hard turns. That kind of thing really annoys me.

    +1 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    Well thank you, @Spectre2520. I think it shows that if the basic shape is good enough, you can drop a lot of detail and have your build still look good.

    +2 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Np man! I saw the original, I didn't realize the landing gear had that much parts! @SledDriver

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,169 Spectre2520

    It still looks gorges even with low part count @SledDriver

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    Thanks, @Strikefighter04. Well, I already made the original with the cool three-axis landing gear. This one is purely for performance. I wanted to keep it under 400 parts as some people complained they couldn't run the original.

    +1 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    So, no cool landing gear then? Oh well, it still looks cool!

    5.5 years ago