@LimesLusania since you don't have enough posts yet, you now only have 8 out of 10 upvotes received. For the next 2 of your builds, tag me and I'll upvote them.
@WinsWings
- Originality: 9/10 (very rare concept, but another high-quality Do-31 exists on the site, so I can't give full marks.)
- Looks: 14/15 (very accurate, I really like that even though you only had less than 1 week to build this, you still pulled it off excellently.)
- Performance: 13/15 (it isn't actually able to VTOL, since the CoL and the CoM aren't right on each other, but I understand that making something VTOL is extremely difficult, and also you had the time constraint thing.)
- Features: 5/5 (i mean, it does still have the VTOL engines and near-VTOL capability...)
- Overall: 41/45 (great job!)
@Mastereldo
- Originality: 10/10 (rare concept, rare on SimplePlanes)
- Looks: 13/15 (it's really accurate, but since the original design doesn't have many details this plane doesn't especially impress me. Also you really should use fuselage smoothing)
- Performance: 12/15 (takes off and lands well, but it can't fly at low altitude and starts spinning when its speed is less than 150km/h. What I like though is the missile-firing)
- Features: 5/5 (has all the weapons, plus cargo hold)
- Overall: 40/45 (great job for a helicopter, especially your first one!)
sorry i miscalculated
@aurelienBTC3937
- Originality: 5/10 (I won't give you a 0, but 5 is still low)
- Looks: 11/15 (it's accurate, but the plane should be a bit longer. The cockpit interior is great though)
- Performance: 8/15 (takes off too quickly, the manouverability is quite unrealistic and when I fly the plane at supersonic speed, it starts shaking violently)
- Features: 4/5 (no droop snoot, but there is a bomb at least)
- Overall: 28/45 (well you tried)
Supersonic nuclear-capable bomber that looks like a missile and has a rocket engine at the back alongside 4 air-breathing engines and has a cockpit window like that of an F-16 placed on the top of the plane
Yes I know the design sounds weird but after I drew the plane out it looked really nice, I’m gonna build it in a month or 2
900+ parts causes orange download button (on my iPhone SE at least)
800 parts if cockpit interior is included
1000 parts is the absolute threshold for mobile devices from what I've observed, it's the benchmark for my aircraft/liveries (though I rarely go above 900)
Also about saving the aircraft, I always reload the aircraft right after saving it to make sure that I had really saved it. I don't know if this is just me being paranoid but it's always good to double-check anyway
Great tutorial, I just want to point out that I don't recommend using undo strategy #2, as saving multiple of the same aircraft will eventually clog up your save folder
@ZeroWithSlashedO and in my opinion, one shouldn’t be overly hyped on getting platinum, because once you reach it the points become effectively meaningless
I still look at my point number and try to get upvotes for my builds, but I prioritise what I want to build over how many upvotes it’ll get.
@realSavageMan
1. Yeah
2. I mean it’s true, that’s why I put the “at the cost of your mobile device’s lag” disclaimer. Although I think provided that it’s a simple logo is (like the one in the tutorial) and not fuselage art, and they make the background transparent, having 2 text logos are still acceptable for a mobile device, correct me if I’m wrong
All upvotes given (phew!)
@LimesLusania since you don't have enough posts yet, you now only have 8 out of 10 upvotes received. For the next 2 of your builds, tag me and I'll upvote them.
Results are Out! (click here)
@LimesLusania
@WinsWings
@TheSonOfThunder
@Mastereldo
@5cmPak38aufPzKpfwIISfl901
@CR929thenewSPplayer
@WinsWings
- Originality:
9/10(very rare concept, but another high-quality Do-31 exists on the site, so I can't give full marks.)- Looks:
14/15(very accurate, I really like that even though you only had less than 1 week to build this, you still pulled it off excellently.)- Performance:
13/15(it isn't actually able to VTOL, since the CoL and the CoM aren't right on each other, but I understand that making something VTOL is extremely difficult, and also you had the time constraint thing.)- Features:
5/5(i mean, it does still have the VTOL engines and near-VTOL capability...)- Overall:
41/45(great job!)The challenge is over.
Results will be posted tonight (in about 9 hours).
@CR929thenewSPplayer results tonight
@Mastereldo
- Originality:
10/10(rare concept, rare on SimplePlanes)- Looks:
13/15(it's really accurate, but since the original design doesn't have many details this plane doesn't especially impress me. Also you really should use fuselage smoothing)- Performance:
12/15(takes off and lands well, but it can't fly at low altitude and starts spinning when its speed is less than 150km/h. What I like though is the missile-firing)- Features:
5/5(has all the weapons, plus cargo hold)- Overall:
40/45(great job for a helicopter, especially your first one!)sorry i miscalculated
i will resist the updoot
.
.
.
.
.
you know what, it still deserves an updoot
@aurelienBTC3937
- Originality:
5/10(I won't give you a 0, but 5 is still low)- Looks:
11/15(it's accurate, but the plane should be a bit longer. The cockpit interior is great though)- Performance:
8/15(takes off too quickly, the manouverability is quite unrealistic and when I fly the plane at supersonic speed, it starts shaking violently)- Features:
4/5(no droop snoot, but there is a bomb at least)- Overall:
28/45(well you tried)@Legomaster0418 I’m releasing a teaser soon
@Brololxd *15k
Wow that was fast, I literally commented on you reaching gold just a month ago lol
the most latest reply of all @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119
ok i’ll stop spamming before the mods come
most latest reply @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119
?
Approved
wow i didn’t even realise it was for the challenge the first time i saw this
and yes, this is your last entry
Supersonic nuclear-capable bomber that looks like a missile and has a rocket engine at the back alongside 4 air-breathing engines and has a cockpit window like that of an F-16 placed on the top of the plane
Yes I know the design sounds weird but after I drew the plane out it looked really nice, I’m gonna build it in a month or 2
@SILVERPANZER it’s nice
@TheEpicTrains3rdAccount this still has more parts than my tonk lol
your nightmares:
Deadline is now 25th of February
because I’ll be quite busy this week and won’t be able to release the results during that time
@WinsWings i just extended the deadline to 25th February, so you have time to submit it
german harrier
You did it!
Also about saving the aircraft, I always reload the aircraft right after saving it to make sure that I had really saved it. I don't know if this is just me being paranoid but it's always good to double-check anyway
It looks... interesting
Great tutorial, I just want to point out that I don't recommend using undo strategy #2, as saving multiple of the same aircraft will eventually clog up your save folder
[edited]
@aurelienBTC3937 oh i thought you meant the one from top gun maverick
If you're making the drone, I'll approve it
noooo i wanted to build this
nah it's fine
This is why I never use that feature
Welcome to SimplePlanes!
This happens because people can better relate to aircraft that exist in real life, rather than a fictional one that only you know about
@ZeroWithSlashedO and in my opinion, one shouldn’t be overly hyped on getting platinum, because once you reach it the points become effectively meaningless
I still look at my point number and try to get upvotes for my builds, but I prioritise what I want to build over how many upvotes it’ll get.
@Hahahahaahahshs you’re not wrong…
Electric airliners look like this
@aurelienBTC3937 but the Darkstar is fictional, I won’t be able to approve it
Note that this post will be updated from time to time as I receive suggestions; the added bits are marked as [Edit].
@realSavageMan
1. Yeah
2. I mean it’s true, that’s why I put the “at the cost of your mobile device’s lag” disclaimer. Although I think provided that it’s a simple logo is (like the one in the tutorial) and not fuselage art, and they make the background transparent, having 2 text logos are still acceptable for a mobile device, correct me if I’m wrong
Be sure to read the comments for more helpful tips!
And finally,
@ReinMcDeer
@MeekhunSP
@Mastereldo
Even more requested tags:
@Dragoranos
@JeskoGoesVROOM
@XAircraftManufacturer
More requested tags:
@Legomaster0418
@Brololxd
@airlinerbuilder
This tutorial is really long and complex, so if there's anything you want to ask me, go ahead.
Requested Tags
Includes those who upvoted that post.
@Turbo18
@SPAircraftOfficial
@Korzalerkle
@Magnavox20MS233S i know
The cockpit looks a bit… strange
@FirstFish83828