@Mastereldo
- Originality: 10/10 (rare concept, rare on SimplePlanes)
- Looks: 13/15 (it's really accurate, but since the original design doesn't have many details this plane doesn't especially impress me. Also you really should use fuselage smoothing)
- Performance: 12/15 (takes off and lands well, but it can't fly at low altitude and starts spinning when its speed is less than 150km/h. What I like though is the missile-firing)
- Features: 5/5 (has all the weapons, plus cargo hold)
- Overall: 40/45 (great job for a helicopter, especially your first one!)
sorry i miscalculated
If you’re bored, you shouldn’t be sitting around here waiting for rickrolls. How about I introduce you to some planes (and other stuffs) that I made? Here’s the link to the list of my creations, hope you’ll like them!
@aurelienBTC3937
- Originality: 5/10 (I won't give you a 0, but 5 is still low)
- Looks: 11/15 (it's accurate, but the plane should be a bit longer. The cockpit interior is great though)
- Performance: 8/15 (takes off too quickly, the manouverability is quite unrealistic and when I fly the plane at supersonic speed, it starts shaking violently)
- Features: 4/5 (no droop snoot, but there is a bomb at least)
- Overall: 28/45 (well you tried)
Supersonic nuclear-capable bomber that looks like a missile and has a rocket engine at the back alongside 4 air-breathing engines and has a cockpit window like that of an F-16 placed on the top of the plane
Yes I know the design sounds weird but after I drew the plane out it looked really nice, I’m gonna build it in a month or 2
900+ parts causes orange download button (on my iPhone SE at least)
800 parts if cockpit interior is included
1000 parts is the absolute threshold for mobile devices from what I've observed, it's the benchmark for my aircraft/liveries (though I rarely go above 900)
Also about saving the aircraft, I always reload the aircraft right after saving it to make sure that I had really saved it. I don't know if this is just me being paranoid but it's always good to double-check anyway
Great tutorial, I just want to point out that I don't recommend using undo strategy #2, as saving multiple of the same aircraft will eventually clog up your save folder
@TheSonOfThunder sorry i'm late
- Originality: 10/10 (concept was almost never heard of, and only 1 other of this plane exists on the site)
- Looks: 14/15 (smooth, with fuselage parts. Accuracy is obviously perfect. And I like how you put all the labels on the plane, even though you didn't need to; it shows how you strive for maximum accuracy)
- Performance: 13/15 (no problems with the flying, except that the flaps cause the plane to crash)
- Features: 5/5 (the wings fold, and it has armament)
- Overall: 42/45 (we have a potential winner!)
@ZeroWithSlashedO and in my opinion, one shouldn’t be overly hyped on getting platinum, because once you reach it the points become effectively meaningless
I still look at my point number and try to get upvotes for my builds, but I prioritise what I want to build over how many upvotes it’ll get.
it’s a signnnnnnnnn
+2Approved
the challenge is technically over, but I haven’t released results so I’ll accept and grade this now
+1The challenge is over.
Results will be posted tonight (in about 9 hours).
@CR929thenewSPplayer results tonight
The frame rate be like
+2@aurelienBTC3937 oh i missed that, gonna add another 2 points
+1@Mastereldo
- Originality:
10/10(rare concept, rare on SimplePlanes)- Looks:
13/15(it's really accurate, but since the original design doesn't have many details this plane doesn't especially impress me. Also you really should use fuselage smoothing)- Performance:
12/15(takes off and lands well, but it can't fly at low altitude and starts spinning when its speed is less than 150km/h. What I like though is the missile-firing)- Features:
5/5(has all the weapons, plus cargo hold)- Overall:
40/45(great job for a helicopter, especially your first one!)sorry i miscalculated
If you’re bored, you shouldn’t be sitting around here waiting for rickrolls. How about I introduce you to some planes (and other stuffs) that I made? Here’s the link to the list of my creations, hope you’ll like them!
+4i will resist the updoot
.
.
.
.
.
you know what, it still deserves an updoot
@aurelienBTC3937
- Originality:
5/10(I won't give you a 0, but 5 is still low)- Looks:
11/15(it's accurate, but the plane should be a bit longer. The cockpit interior is great though)- Performance:
8/15(takes off too quickly, the manouverability is quite unrealistic and when I fly the plane at supersonic speed, it starts shaking violently)- Features:
4/5(no droop snoot, but there is a bomb at least)- Overall:
28/45(well you tried)@Legomaster0418 I’m releasing a teaser soon
@Brololxd *15k
Very epic
+1Wow that was fast, I literally commented on you reaching gold just a month ago lol
First
+1the most latest reply of all @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119
ok i’ll stop spamming before the mods come
most latest reply @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119 @Robomo00119
?
Approved
wow i didn’t even realise it was for the challenge the first time i saw this
and yes, this is your last entry
Did I just get rickrolled
+22nd upvote
+1@imannoyedonly25words it's a perfect replica of a block
+1it's the wrong way aroun-
+1RICK SHAW NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
+2Supersonic nuclear-capable bomber that looks like a missile and has a rocket engine at the back alongside 4 air-breathing engines and has a cockpit window like that of an F-16 placed on the top of the plane
Yes I know the design sounds weird but after I drew the plane out it looked really nice, I’m gonna build it in a month or 2
Train sim in a plane sim
+3@SILVERPANZER it’s nice
@TheEpicTrains3rdAccount this still has more parts than my tonk lol
your nightmares:
Deadline is now 25th of February
because I’ll be quite busy this week and won’t be able to release the results during that time
@WinsWings i just extended the deadline to 25th February, so you have time to submit it
german harrier
who needs juno when you have this-
waits to get trashed by the juno fans
+2You did it!
Also about saving the aircraft, I always reload the aircraft right after saving it to make sure that I had really saved it. I don't know if this is just me being paranoid but it's always good to double-check anyway
It looks... interesting
Great tutorial, I just want to point out that I don't recommend using undo strategy #2, as saving multiple of the same aircraft will eventually clog up your save folder
[edited]
bonus 1
+1bonus 2 (very cursed)
@TheSonOfThunder sorry i'm late
+1- Originality:
10/10(concept was almost never heard of, and only 1 other of this plane exists on the site)- Looks:
14/15(smooth, with fuselage parts. Accuracy is obviously perfect. And I like how you put all the labels on the plane, even though you didn't need to; it shows how you strive for maximum accuracy)- Performance:
13/15(no problems with the flying, except that the flaps cause the plane to crash)- Features:
5/5(the wings fold, and it has armament)- Overall:
42/45(we have a potential winner!)Approved
nah I'll still give you a 5 for the originality segment
+1@aurelienBTC3937 oh i thought you meant the one from top gun maverick
If you're making the drone, I'll approve it
NOOOOO YOU BUTTERED THE RYANAIR HOW COULD YOU YOU'RE FIRED
+1noooo i wanted to build this
nah it's fine
This is why I never use that feature
Welcome to SimplePlanes!
Thanks for following my tutorial, the livery really looks much nicer now! Keep it up! @Brololxd
+1This happens because people can better relate to aircraft that exist in real life, rather than a fictional one that only you know about
@ZeroWithSlashedO and in my opinion, one shouldn’t be overly hyped on getting platinum, because once you reach it the points become effectively meaningless
I still look at my point number and try to get upvotes for my builds, but I prioritise what I want to build over how many upvotes it’ll get.
6. German
+1It’s just german.
Example