@PyrusEnderhunter There is no real similarity between the E-1 Dragon GV and the A-1 Pummeler other than it's origins as a fighter turned attack plane.
The A-1 Pummeler is a slow, long-loitering and highly-maneuverable prop-driven ground pounder known for its power, accuracy, durability, and economy. It is a favorite around the world as a result, and sees service for over a century and a half.
The E-1 Dragon GV is a fast, low-endurance, and unmaneuverable jet interceptor with bombs and rockets strapped to it. Although it has plenty more power over the Pummeler, it lacks the accuracy, durability, and economy that makes the Pummeler so effective.
The A-1 Pummeler can, and most often does, operate on short, unprepared airstrips in the most astute conditions. It's hangar is most often a simple tent on the side of an airstrip, often shared by its aircrew and mechanics. These airstrips are carved from the wilderness itself, and Mother Nature will spare no effort remind you.
Most Pummelers are best described as a Frankenstein mix of parts from a dozen different airplanes and field improvisations. The fact the airplanes are even functional in such a state is a testament to the design, something not helped by the often contaminated fuels that leak their way to their airfields.
Its pilots rarely close their canopies; they fly by the roar of the engines, the cold wind in their face, and their own gut. Only when Mother Nature is at her worst do they resort to instruments. They know their plane as well as a mother knows her baby. Every quirk and habit is not lost to the pilot.
Without the aid of a computer other than their own brain, they can drop bombs and fire rockets so precisely that they can drop a bomb through a bunker's firing aperture.
This is impossible with a plane as complex as the E-1. The E-1 needs things like smooth concrete runways, proper hangars, regular maintenance, good fuel, and proper logistics. The Pummeler sees them as luxuries.
@PyrusEnderhunter We can deliver the rifles in short order. For an extra $10, we can replace the wooden furniture with a nylon-polymer stock to make it more suitable in colder climates.
M11A1SM is basically the M11A1 semi-automatic rifle with a scope mount. Rifles chosen for this modification are one's that have unusually high accuracy.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation That's exactly what it is lol.
@PyrusEnderhunter There is no real similarity between the E-1 Dragon GV and the A-1 Pummeler other than it's origins as a fighter turned attack plane.
The A-1 Pummeler is a slow, long-loitering and highly-maneuverable prop-driven ground pounder known for its power, accuracy, durability, and economy. It is a favorite around the world as a result, and sees service for over a century and a half.
The E-1 Dragon GV is a fast, low-endurance, and unmaneuverable jet interceptor with bombs and rockets strapped to it. Although it has plenty more power over the Pummeler, it lacks the accuracy, durability, and economy that makes the Pummeler so effective.
The A-1 Pummeler can, and most often does, operate on short, unprepared airstrips in the most astute conditions. It's hangar is most often a simple tent on the side of an airstrip, often shared by its aircrew and mechanics. These airstrips are carved from the wilderness itself, and Mother Nature will spare no effort remind you.
Most Pummelers are best described as a Frankenstein mix of parts from a dozen different airplanes and field improvisations. The fact the airplanes are even functional in such a state is a testament to the design, something not helped by the often contaminated fuels that leak their way to their airfields.
Its pilots rarely close their canopies; they fly by the roar of the engines, the cold wind in their face, and their own gut. Only when Mother Nature is at her worst do they resort to instruments. They know their plane as well as a mother knows her baby. Every quirk and habit is not lost to the pilot.
Without the aid of a computer other than their own brain, they can drop bombs and fire rockets so precisely that they can drop a bomb through a bunker's firing aperture.
This is impossible with a plane as complex as the E-1. The E-1 needs things like smooth concrete runways, proper hangars, regular maintenance, good fuel, and proper logistics. The Pummeler sees them as luxuries.
@PyrusEnderhunter I personally prefer the Pummeler for attack duties.
@PyrusEnderhunter Describe it.
@YuukaNeko I suppose.
@YuukaNeko Found it.
@YuukaNeko lol
@PhantomBladeCorp I also gave the TC a girlfriend. Her name is Ma Deuce.
They actually made this. @YuukaNeko
I once had 66.6k.
But lol. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
China already does. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Look at other builds like mine to get an idea about ergonomics. @PyrusEnderhunter
Now you do. @PINK
@PyrusEnderhunter No. The basic ergonomic appearance.
@PINK lol. It's a commentary by a Paternian Army Jungle Reconnaissance Scout. She felt that the rifle was of lower quality to the Paternian rifles.
@DankDorito Cool.
I am totally not planning to take India for Britain, or planning to remove ISFOS presence in Australia.
@PINK Your forces played an important role certainly.
I would have been more active on the chat if I didn't have to sleep.
@PyrusEnderhunter Ehhh...
The aesthetics and ergonomics of your guns could be improved. Our soldiers found it clumsy and awkward. We suggest buying M16 or M18 rifles from us.
@PyrusEnderhunter We can deliver the rifles in short order. For an extra $10, we can replace the wooden furniture with a nylon-polymer stock to make it more suitable in colder climates.
@PyrusEnderhunter We have plenty of surplus M11A1SM. For cheap.
$75 each rifle.
The Paternian Army's M11A1SM is a decent rifle.
M11A1SM is basically the M11A1 semi-automatic rifle with a scope mount. Rifles chosen for this modification are one's that have unusually high accuracy.
@DankDorito Promise not to invade Pakistan?
@Nef680 Lemme get to it.
I think it was an NB-52B "Balls 8" that dropped the plane.
They call it "Balls 8" because its tail number was "52-008".
Who do you mean by "hostile nation"?
@PyrusEnderhunter Nope.
I doubt they can stalk ROC troops without them noticing.
Do they eat what they eat?
No, because we kill them all. @PyrusEnderhunter
Geographically, the forces in Korea are fcuked.
Total troop numbers on both sides may be similar, but his is all concentrated on the peninsula. @PyrusEnderhunter
And he has millions of those. As powerful my navy is, his control of the waters around Korea is not to be contested without significant losses.
His forces outnumber the forces in Korea to shiet. He has a significant logistic and strategic advantage if he attacks Korea. @PyrusEnderhunter
Got you an upvote. @ElectricVolta16
If you like planes like this, there's my Pummeler.
Well my first suggestion is to cede Korea. Its indefensible. He CAN simply rush down and cut them off from reinforcements via Navy. @PyrusEnderhunter
In the meantime, would you like M-16 or AR-18? @PyrusEnderhunter
Ok. :(@PyrusEnderhunter
Is that a yes? @PyrusEnderhunter
Ok. @PyrusEnderhunter
Will tell GoldenEagle. Would you mind if I manage your territories in the time you are grounded? @PyrusEnderhunter
Np! Looks too modern though. @PyrusEnderhunter
Yes. @Dllama4
It's the red-headed cousin of the AR-15. A decent gun who did great things, but always in the shadow of the AR-15. @YuukaNeko
Wide tracks = lower ground pressure = not sinking in sand.
Yes, it's coming. Do you want me to link you to a private upload or make it public. @PINK
@Supercraft888 Hi.
@TheBroadside Nope. Howa Machinery Co. made the AR-18 alright. They didn't make it for long, though.
However, their experience making the AR-18/AR-180 was put to use when making the Type 89.
lol
I have plenty of tanks you can work with. As a member of the PC Master Race, I extend my hand to the iOS peasants and offer my assistance.
Okay.
Good-looking tank!
@YuukaNeko Did you know they actually made these in Japan?
They were only made from 1970-1974, when export controls on Japanese military hardware prevented it from being exported, and production ceased.
Np! You fine with the story? @TemDesBur