In fact, the primary function of the rudder in an aircraft is not to turn the aircraft left or right, but rather to align the nose of the aircraft with the direction of the turn. Turning an aircraft without using the rudder is possible by combining roll and pitch, which becomes particularly evident in aircraft designs without vertical stabilizers.
When an aircraft rolls to lift one wing (e.g., the left side), the difference in lift between the wings generates a lateral force, causing the aircraft to turn in that direction (in this case, left). Pitching the nose upward during the roll can further enhance this turning effect by increasing torque. However, the lift generated by the wings during this maneuver comes at the expense of kinetic energy, resulting in a reduction in airspeed on the side of the aircraft that is rolled upward.
This uneven distribution of speed causes a phenomenon called adverse yaw, where the nose of the aircraft begins to point in the opposite direction of the turn (to the right, in this example). The rudder is used to counteract this adverse yaw, ensuring that the nose of the aircraft aligns with the direction of the turn.
In essence, the rudder does not create the turn but ensures that the aircraft is aerodynamically coordinated by preventing unwanted yaw, making the turn smoother and more efficient.
So rudders work on mobile devices, but instead of using them alone to turn the plane, you should use them integrated with other control surfaces. Despite this, using the rudder in its proper function is not easy on mobile, but it works.
@RepublicofWrightIsles If I understand correctly you wanted to make a Horten 18 with vertical stabilizer.
If that's the question, you can definitely make a better version of Horten 18. However, do not forget to emphasize that this feature is not supported in the real design.
@MrPigee I will download and rate soon. Currently I'm working on another Simpleplanes post.
@RepublicofWrightIsles 👍🏻
In fact, the primary function of the rudder in an aircraft is not to turn the aircraft left or right, but rather to align the nose of the aircraft with the direction of the turn. Turning an aircraft without using the rudder is possible by combining roll and pitch, which becomes particularly evident in aircraft designs without vertical stabilizers.
When an aircraft rolls to lift one wing (e.g., the left side), the difference in lift between the wings generates a lateral force, causing the aircraft to turn in that direction (in this case, left). Pitching the nose upward during the roll can further enhance this turning effect by increasing torque. However, the lift generated by the wings during this maneuver comes at the expense of kinetic energy, resulting in a reduction in airspeed on the side of the aircraft that is rolled upward.
This uneven distribution of speed causes a phenomenon called adverse yaw, where the nose of the aircraft begins to point in the opposite direction of the turn (to the right, in this example). The rudder is used to counteract this adverse yaw, ensuring that the nose of the aircraft aligns with the direction of the turn.
In essence, the rudder does not create the turn but ensures that the aircraft is aerodynamically coordinated by preventing unwanted yaw, making the turn smoother and more efficient.
So rudders work on mobile devices, but instead of using them alone to turn the plane, you should use them integrated with other control surfaces. Despite this, using the rudder in its proper function is not easy on mobile, but it works.
@Dervis
@Dervis Or i can make Anka 3
@SPsidearm OK
I will judge it as soon as possible
@MrPigee Yes
@SPsidearm Don't use a bomb as an explosive, they are generaly failing, use torpedo instead.
@SPsidearm OK
@mechakevina Yes but don't forget to give a credit for it.
@SPsidearm Can't you just edit XML and set explosion scale over 50?
@SPsidearm Is it nuclear?
• Design (2 points)
• Yeah, low effort
• Movement Performance (4 points)
• Not so mobile, but a giant lence is not intended to be that mobile.
• Weapons (5 points)
• Tracers are ok but it would be better to scale gun down to hide, also decrease the flash scale.
• Post Content (2 points)
• You know
• Playability (4 points)
• Not bad
Total: 17/50
@SPsidearm Sure
@Xper1m3ntal
@Xper1m3ntal
1) Find the image you want to add from Chrome or upload from your device to internet. (I use ibb.co to upload)
2) Right click (or long click at mobile) on picture and open in new tab.
3) Copy the URL from the top bar.
4)  paste your URL between brackets.
If you do it properly it will look like this
 and apper as image
@Numbers2
.
.
.
My honest reaction to Genova Convention
.
.
.
.
(Nvr mind that was a joke)
Man, i'm not able to accept this things as superweapons.
(Definition: Superweapon)
Can u make it a functional weapon. (Let it explode)
@Thatrando Sure, that's why there is a KV-222 in the thumbnail
@RepublicofWrightIsles If I understand correctly you wanted to make a Horten 18 with vertical stabilizer.
If that's the question, you can definitely make a better version of Horten 18. However, do not forget to emphasize that this feature is not supported in the real design.
What is wrong with it?
@foury @SPsidearm Yes you can make any type of nuclear missiles
• Design (2 points)
• Looks really cursed.
• Movement Performance (2 points)
• Controls are reversed and wings are flapping.
• Weapons (3 points)
• The main gun is cool but poorly designed.
• Post Content (2 points)
• You should try thumbnail with background, in-game pictures, more detailed info. and control details.
• Playability (2 points)
• Even i can't properly control it, sorry but it's not that enjoyible to play.
Total: 11/50
@SPsidearm @Xper1m3ntal @LowQualityRepublic As i mentioned in rules part -you can look at images too- you are allowed to build what you want.
JUST BUILD A SUPERWEAPON
@VulpesDynamics They are both OK to build. But as a SW Battlefront II player I will chose Operation Cinder Satellites.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 it's open for fictional builds too and i think nuclear weapons are superweapons too
But there are lots of pictures in photo gallery. Check again @MAHADI
@MAHADI Images from photo gallery?
You are not supposed to see them in the game.
@Logontery > Here it is <
@Logontery Just wait a little bit
@foury @Hahahahaahahshs @EmpireofWrightIsles @RedTrinity
Thanks Guys
@Logontery I am working on the post
CHALLENGE ENDED!
Winner Team: NATO
1st: @cyon
2nd:@ComradeComissar
3rd:@NermalTheBoy20
1- Design: +2 points (Simpleplane)
2- Movement Performance: +3 (Pitch and roll are unbalanced)
3- Weapons: +5 points (normal)
4- Post Content: +4 points (nice history)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +4 points (Not so much)
6- Replica: +0 points (no)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:28
1- Design: +3 points (Simple)
2- Movement Performance: +4 (Uncomfortable)
3- Weapons: +3 points (Only a low rpm gun)
4- Post Content: +3 points (Only Thumbnail)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +4 points
6- Replica: +10 points (yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:37
Part count is too low for submission
1- Design: +8 points (Just good)
2- Movement Performance: +8 (Enough agile)
3- Weapons: +8 points (Realistic)
4- Post Content: +7 points (There are not any photos in gallery??)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +8 points (Yes)
6- Replica: +10 points (yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:59
1- Design: +7 points (Perfect interior)
2- Movement Performance: +7 (Good)
3- Weapons: +9 points (Try camera aim for turrets)
4- Post Content: +9 points (Good job)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +8 points (Yes.)
6- Replica: +10 points (yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:60
Announcement:
I have to finish the judging of the Cold War Challenge, then I will post KAAN.
@Logontery Sağol
So Cool
@Meatloa Toggle camera to find gun cameras. You can use them to aim. (Try zooming for precise aiming) It can easily destroy USS Beast's carrier group.
@Meatloa It's a seaplane. It hasn't got landing gears. Try Water takeoff.
@cyon Thanks
Thank you all guys.
Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 4 points (It's a good pea again but it looks like Mirage 3000 more than F-102.)
2- Movement Performance: +9 points (Accellerating very realisticly and also very stable.)
3- Weapons: +6 points (Ralistic default weapons.)
4- Post Content: +7 points (Only problem is shortness of text. Add control list and a longer description.)
5- Is it fun to play?: +6 points (Not bad.)
6- Replica: +10 points (Yes.)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (Communist killer)
Total:
52 points
Ok
@Rb2h What is the problem? They are working.
Rated post
Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 2 points (Simple design.)
2- Movement Performance: + 5 points (Not that agile.)
3- Weapons: + 7 points (Too much missiles and these guns r going brrttt.)
4- Post Content: +2 points (I cant see anything.)
5- Is it fun to play?: +5 points (Not perfect but i like guns.)
6- Replica: +0 points (No)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (wth is a km? 🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🦅)
Total:
31 points
@TTL It seems perfect!