No worries at all, @ComradeComissar Life always comes first, and I totally understand how school and holidays can get in the way. You definitely didn’t waste the extension. It provided me extra time for judging, and it’s always a pleasure seeing you take part in my challenges. You’ve already made an awesome mark in the previous one, and I’ll be looking forward to seeing your work in the next!
Wishing you all the best with your studies—hang in there and take care!
@SemedianIndustries If i can test it properly i will accept. My device starts lagging at aprx. 1500 pieces but i think i can test it with some huge fps loss.
@Numbers2 So congurats, you made a jammer proof missile. This is how combat technology works. Somebody makes a jammer and other makes a missile which is not effected.
I just tested it against all 4 level of sam evasion. It doesn't matters is missile is already launched. It can evade already launched missiles too - even mad ones.
@ComradeComissar The BTR-80 is an 8×8 wheeled amphibious armoured personnel carrier (APC) designed in the Soviet Union. It was adopted in 1985 and replaced the previous vehicles, the BTR-60 and BTR-70, in the Soviet Army... wikipedia
Friends, there was an earthquake 4 hours ago. It shook Istanbul with a magnitude of 6.2 and aftershocks reached up to 5.9. There are no exact figures yet but it seems there was no serious damage. However, even though I live 200 km away from Istanbul, I felt it strongly and there are still questions about whether there will be more countershocks. I hope this will be overcome with minimal damage.
• Thiscan be the highest part count to design point build in this challenge with incredible 1/10.
• Movement Performance (9 points)
• Only two very little problems that makes it kinda annoying. 1- It's yaw is hard to control. It takes a while to stop turning. (You need to say that there is camera aim)
• Overall good but some details are not enough worked.
• Movement Performance (6 points)
• Average Russian engineering. Built unstable, it has to provide multimanueverability if stabilized well but your plane - pardon submarine (or over-marine?) is using a gyro which limits most of manuevers.
• Weapons (7 points)
• Overarmed and generally performing well but there is a problem with esthetic details like weapon bays. But i like what you did with the gun.
• Post Content (4 points)
• Good thumbnail but text and photos are not enough.
@SemedianIndustries Thanks, I see. It's awsome and it looks like it will provide lots of information while judging. Still, if you can find more feedbacks i want to consider all.
@jedreubeng From transform part menu. Press zero locations.
+4@WaterFlavouredSpitfires Yes why not?
+4No worries at all, @ComradeComissar Life always comes first, and I totally understand how school and holidays can get in the way. You definitely didn’t waste the extension. It provided me extra time for judging, and it’s always a pleasure seeing you take part in my challenges. You’ve already made an awesome mark in the previous one, and I’ll be looking forward to seeing your work in the next!
Wishing you all the best with your studies—hang in there and take care!
+3@SemedianIndustries If i can test it properly i will accept. My device starts lagging at aprx. 1500 pieces but i think i can test it with some huge fps loss.
+3@NermalTheBoy20 Now NATO has taken the lead.
+3@Aviancabuilder I added too but they are not working when you detach planes. I searched a way a lot but they are not working.
+3@AeroTactical Will you build something in 4 days?
+2@Rb2h Oh, thanks
+2@IMCI Something like a superwepon base will be ok.
+2@IMCI Yep
+2Your locking circle will not align with enemy if you rotate cockpit.
+2@Numbers2 So congurats, you made a jammer proof missile. This is how combat technology works. Somebody makes a jammer and other makes a missile which is not effected.
+2@SuperSuperTheSylph Actualy its simple but for aesthetic look im a designing 50-75 part case. It will be really easy to pick jammer system in it.
+2I just tested it against all 4 level of sam evasion. It doesn't matters is missile is already launched. It can evade already launched missiles too - even mad ones.
+2• Design (10 points)
• Perfect
• Movement Performance (7 points)
• I think this thing is not intended to fly
• Weapons (10 points)
• Weapons go boomboom
• Post Content (10 points)
• Perfect, long and full of pictures!
• Playability (10 points)
• Yes
Total: 47/50
+2@Rb2h Prototype Freedom Bringer
+2If you build Jaguar your you will increase NATO's point.
+2@Apollo018362 Post your build as a succesor like other challenges. According to your builds nation your point will be added to appropriate team.
+2@ComradeComissar The BTR-80 is an 8×8 wheeled amphibious armoured personnel carrier (APC) designed in the Soviet Union. It was adopted in 1985 and replaced the previous vehicles, the BTR-60 and BTR-70, in the Soviet Army...
+2wikipedia
@IQinventory
1- I know but sombody said they will make 1000+ parts, to judge equaly im not giving high points.
2- I flied at fast forward between 5k to 10k feet for minutes. It couldn't pass 1000 mph.
3- No problem at manuvering, problem is that the nose involuntarily goes up during the flight.
4- Description pictures. Like this. (Click the link and scroll down to see them.)
+2Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 5 points (Normal)
2- Movement Performance: +7 points (Speed is not high enough)
3- Weapons: +7 points (Games default weapons/ realistic)
4- Post Content: +4 points (Description is short there aren't any photos.)
5- Is it fun to play?: +5 points (Not bad)
6- Replica: +10 points (Yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (Pure Bias)
Total:
48 points
+2@Bryan5 Yes I was inspired by your challenge, but I wanted to add civilian experimental aircrafts as well.
+2Friends, there was an earthquake 4 hours ago. It shook Istanbul with a magnitude of 6.2 and aftershocks reached up to 5.9. There are no exact figures yet but it seems there was no serious damage. However, even though I live 200 km away from Istanbul, I felt it strongly and there are still questions about whether there will be more countershocks. I hope this will be overcome with minimal damage.
+1@MobileBuilder21
+1@ComradeComissar
@SemedianIndustries As there are any more people judging this i'm using the judging from @PlaneFlightX with satisfication.
+1@Grob0s0VBRa sadge
+1@Bugati87 I think you should tell this in description. Most of people will try to aim without knowing this function.
+1• Design (5 points)
• Thiscan be the highest part count to design point build in this challenge with incredible 1/10.
• Movement Performance (9 points)
• Only two very little problems that makes it kinda annoying. 1- It's yaw is hard to control. It takes a while to stop turning. (You need to say that there is camera aim)
• Weapons (7 points)
• Explosions makes game too laggy.
• Post Content (6 points)
• This is better.
• Playability (7 points)
• Really fun.
Total: 34/50
+1• Design (6 points)
• Cool
• Movement Performance (6 points)
• Overall good. Speed is really high but and average maueverability.
• Weapons (4 points)
• Bomb is not exploding when contact.
• Post Content (5 points)
• No description photos.
• Playability (5 points)
• Bomb is not functioning.
Total: 26/50
+1• Design (1 points)
• 2 parts
• Movement Performance (1 points)
• Not moving and no drop physics.
• Weapons (2 points)
• only changing couple of xml doesn't makes it good.
• Post Content (1 points)
• No
• Playability (2 points)
• Maybe?
Total 7/50
+1• Design (3 points)
• Good work for 60 parts.
• Movement Performance (4 points)
• Good speed but not flying stable. Heading down. It needs trim.
• Weapons (5 points)
• Low effort superweapon.
• Post Content (6 points)
• A fictional story and photos, they are ok but its not same for thumbnail.
• Playability (4 points)
• Uncontrolable
Total: 22/50
+1• Design (5 points)
• Overall good but some details are not enough worked.
• Movement Performance (6 points)
• Average Russian engineering. Built unstable, it has to provide multimanueverability if stabilized well but your plane - pardon submarine (or over-marine?) is using a gyro which limits most of manuevers.
• Weapons (7 points)
• Overarmed and generally performing well but there is a problem with esthetic details like weapon bays. But i like what you did with the gun.
• Post Content (4 points)
• Good thumbnail but text and photos are not enough.
• Playability (7 points)
• Yes, it is fun.
Total 29/50
+1@Icey21 Its already uploaded
+1• Design (2 points)
• SimpleMissiles
• Movement Performance (7 points)
• Fast and agile.
• Weapons (4 points)
• Explosion is huge but lack of esthetics.
• Post Content (6 points)
• Text are short and there are not anybdescription photos.
• Playability (4 points)
• No launch mechanism, plain, can't see explosion.
Total: 23/50
+1@SemedianIndustries Thanks, I see. It's awsome and it looks like it will provide lots of information while judging. Still, if you can find more feedbacks i want to consider all.
+1@MalaySmoker
+1• Design (7 points)
• Detailed but nose shape is awkward.
• Movement Performance (9 points)
• Super-
• Weapons (9 points)
• Weapon
• Post Content (7 points)
• Pic is ok but no description
• Playability (8 points)
• Good
Total: 40/50
+1Unfortunately this is not a superweapon but i like this so i will upvote.
+1@PUMKINSIDD I can't play this. I don't know why but my device crashes when i press play button.
+1@Riyadqadri Ok. Here is an upvote as honorable mention reward.
+1@bumaxi I will announce winners after challenge ends.@Riyadqadri
+1@bumaxi Click on the blue text it's the link
+1@bumaxi CL-1201 is already done
+1@MalaySmoker Make it as powerful as you can.
+1@Rb2h
+1and why?
@blt I really appreciate your work but this gun is not a superweapon.
+1.
Dictionary meaning of superweapon
@AquaViT Yes, but don't forget to set it to zero-rotation. When it's finished press AG1 to start jammer.
+1@Panzerwaifu69 What kind of spaceship is it?
+1@Rb2h
+1Wait what is this? I have 9999 missed calls from Jundroo.
Damn they noticed that because of your report. I hope they won't ban us💀💀
@XEPOH If there is no cockpit how to lock your wepons on enemy or calculate speed?
+1