@FOXHOUND26
Wow, this sounds like it's going to be a really crazy project, but it's not hard, I'll try to finish it in a few days.
So do you have a name suggestion?
Ok guys, I think there is some confusion here about the swastika, the emblem of the Finnish air force, therefore I made a short compilation from wikipedia to solve this problem:
The early history of the Finnish Air Force began with Russian aircraft stationed in Finland before their independence. During the Finnish Civil War in 1918, the Whites managed to seize aircraft from the Soviets with the help of foreign pilots and aircraft. Swedish citizens contributed with aircraft, the first of which arrived in February 1918. The Swedish count Eric von Rosen presented the White Government of Finland with a Thulin Typ D aircraft, painted by Hermann Goerig (later commander in chief of the Luftwaffe) with a blue swastika symbolising good luck. This symbol was officially adopted in March 1918 and became the emblem of the Finnish Air Force. Although the symbol was changed by Allied decision after 1944, it still appears on some unit emblems and insignia.
@Mousewithamachinegun123
6. Must be a new plane, or a reworked old plane.
It's reworked old plane but it can be only 1 successor.
But Iwill ad original's link.
@Mousewithamachinegun123
How are you going to do the awarding, you know not everyone has 50 posts (although in this case I am at the front and I think I have 50 posts)
@Gincat
If you can make your aircraft a successor, no problem, but you know that you get auto-credit if you recreate someone else's work. In this case, only this can be a problem, that is, if you can somehow make your design a successor of the challenge.
Illegal tip: (You didn't hear it from me) if you remove all parts of a design except the cockpit, sub-assemble it and add it to the design you downloaded to participate in the challenge, you have successfully stolen someone else's design and you will only get auto-credit for my challenge
@Gincat Blackburn Firebrand is a very good idea, I didn't know much about this aircraft either, and 223 units were produced, including prototypes, so it is a complete unfamous aircraft. Also NF-104 is a good experimental airctaft choice.
It's hard to do gigantic stuff on mobile, but typing "mediterranean" is even harder. First I wrote "meditarrenian" by mistake and corrected it when I realized that I misspelled it, but then I accidentally pressed undo button (again) so it saved wrong so you can save it correctly while downloading if you want
@WaterFlavouredSpitfires Im so glad to hear that and I have got good news for you I recently posted a new airship it's link is here
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/c2vNdl/Zeppelin-Otto-von-Bismarck
@Eggplant I have seen that them become a nightmare for students at my age (:
@FOXHOUND26
@FOXHOUND26 ok
@FOXHOUND26
Wow, this sounds like it's going to be a really crazy project, but it's not hard, I'll try to finish it in a few days.
So do you have a name suggestion?
@FOXHOUND26 Tell me, what do you want?
Ok guys, I think there is some confusion here about the swastika, the emblem of the Finnish air force, therefore I made a short compilation from wikipedia to solve this problem:
The early history of the Finnish Air Force began with Russian aircraft stationed in Finland before their independence. During the Finnish Civil War in 1918, the Whites managed to seize aircraft from the Soviets with the help of foreign pilots and aircraft. Swedish citizens contributed with aircraft, the first of which arrived in February 1918. The Swedish count Eric von Rosen presented the White Government of Finland with a Thulin Typ D aircraft, painted by Hermann Goerig (later commander in chief of the Luftwaffe) with a blue swastika symbolising good luck. This symbol was officially adopted in March 1918 and became the emblem of the Finnish Air Force. Although the symbol was changed by Allied decision after 1944, it still appears on some unit emblems and insignia.
@Trainzo Thanks
@kiji how can u upvote you are only 0
@Mousewithamachinegun123
Ok I will be more careful next time.
@Mousewithamachinegun123
+16. Must be a new plane, or a reworked old plane.
It's reworked old plane but it can be only 1 successor.
But Iwill ad original's link.
@Mousewithamachinegun123
+1How are you going to do the awarding, you know not everyone has 50 posts (although in this case I am at the front and I think I have 50 posts)
@Mousewithamachinegun123
I've just finished making it.
+1@Gincat
If you can make your aircraft a successor, no problem, but you know that you get auto-credit if you recreate someone else's work. In this case, only this can be a problem, that is, if you can somehow make your design a successor of the challenge.
Illegal tip: (You didn't hear it from me) if you remove all parts of a design except the cockpit, sub-assemble it and add it to the design you downloaded to participate in the challenge, you have successfully stolen someone else's design and you will only get auto-credit for my challenge
"...get to Mark 2 but it..."
Wasn't that mach?
@WaterFlavouredSpitfires
Thank you very much, I hope we have a nice year!
@waterflavouredspitfires
Perfect!
@daniboi99 I have used a modded gyroscope and bullet like spining holds it on it's path.
@Guywhobuildsstuff It's all right. Everything's fine with me. If you do it fine I will be happy to see it at this challenge.
@OrangNormal If it meets the rules, there will be no problem
@Gincat Blackburn Firebrand is a very good idea, I didn't know much about this aircraft either, and 223 units were produced, including prototypes, so it is a complete unfamous aircraft. Also NF-104 is a good experimental airctaft choice.
@Graingy Actually they were flying and they are not well-known so why not...
+1@FighterPilot04 @LunarEclipseSP @SkylieAviation @Randomplayer @Averynormaluser @LM0418 @HuskyDynamics01 @pancelvonat @SILVERPANZER @Shimamurahougetsu @ZerkkFujimi @OkaNieba @DatMaluchGuy19 @CalabooseCal @Graingy @SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore @Boeing727200F @NormalCv580enjoyer @Bryan5
@Kerbango Yes, you are true, so I will post a new version soon and I think that will be Gloster Meteor (:
The Challenge is finished and you are the second, congratulations!
Congratulations, you are the winner @LimeAir! Here are your upvotes.
@WaterFlavouredSpitfires Actually, I was based on the Bismark Zeppelin that you built wich is based on my build. :)
And I just liked your coloring.
@DatMaluchGuy19 @WaterFlavouredSpitfires Thanks!
@TinyMaus Hi, I couldn't understand what you said, which shape are you talking about?
@WaterFlavouredSpitfires
Also there is Dassault Rafale Baguette Fighter if you don't know (:
Of Course!
@YoMAma123
Actually its not hard, cover wings with fuselage and just edit corner types
I have an idea first disconnect the cockpit and create a subassembly and add it to my challenge's cockpit which you downloaded before
@EPRGxgarpun
+1What is the problem why auto credit isnt working?
+1@YoMAma123 did you mean wing shape?
@Maver1ck
OK, not problem
Yay! Now Im 2000+! Thanks everyone
Hi @Maver1ick , if you want to make your plane a successor, you must first download this challenge and build the plane on it.
How, Based?
@LM0418
Certainly
@Bryan5 Yes I was inspired by your challenge, but I wanted to add civilian experimental aircrafts as well.
+2It's hard to do gigantic stuff on mobile, but typing "mediterranean" is even harder. First I wrote "meditarrenian" by mistake and corrected it when I realized that I misspelled it, but then I accidentally pressed undo button (again) so it saved wrong so you can save it correctly while downloading if you want
@SPAircraftOfficial
NO
No baguettes were harmed while preparing this content.
Yes again
+1Because previous one's propeler's invert is wrong (:
Sorry I uploaded it again becouse in previous post I made a mistake. I placed wings wrong. Im sorry about that.
"Spirit of Onat67" is a good detail :)
+1@WaterFlavouredSpitfires Im so glad to hear that and I have got good news for you I recently posted a new airship it's link is here
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/c2vNdl/Zeppelin-Otto-von-Bismarck
@RYAviation I tried my best i'm glad you like it but it would be better if my mobile device let me build a bit more detail