25.6k Mustang51 Comments

  • Cormorant MkIV 5.8 years ago

    Pretty nice build!

  • Battalion Mk2 RT 5.8 years ago

    This plane is really nice but it’s a shame it needs mods to fly. When I added a motor it flew very well and it felt quite realistic to how such an aircraft would fly. Wonderfully built but use xml modded engines instead!

  • mig 21 production 5.8 years ago

    This is a pretty nice MiG-21! There’s been a lot of these being posted recently and this is one of the better ones! The armament could be more realistic but other than that it’s really good!

  • EAC-47 5.8 years ago

    This is really nicely made! Well done

  • Westland Whirlwind 5.8 years ago

    I see now you’ve been very good at this for a long time hahaha

  • Fairey Fulmar Mk.II 5.8 years ago

    This camo is really well made. That must have taken some effort

  • Dewoitine D.520 5.8 years ago

    You have a very nice taste in aircraft. You build them incredibly well too!

  • Albatros D.III 5.8 years ago

    Yet another wonderful build

  • Sopwith Triplane 5.8 years ago

    The way you make these WWI era planes is fantastic!

  • Sopwith Camel F.1 5.8 years ago

    This is a really cool build! You added a lot of detail that makes this plane look incredible

  • Flying wing 5.8 years ago

    This is pretty nice! It’s a little unstable but then again, it is a flying wing. These are some of my favourite aircraft types to build

  • ScAS-1 x4 280m 5.8 years ago

    This is really fantastic. So simple yet so well made. Lovely job!

  • La-2 5.8 years ago

    @DaDerpachu123 it’s much easier than you think! Take a look at some builds which use that technique and reverse engineer them. It will help with it

  • Su-11 Fishpot 5.8 years ago

    @DaDerpachu123 thank you for your kind comment! I suppose you figured it out yourself but the planes aren’t really related other than that they share the style of build many soviet aircraft developers were using. This plane is essentially an upgraded Su-9 which was developed at roughly the same time as the MiG-21 but for different roles. I hope that answers your question!

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @LockheedLover I’ll do my best on the Electra 10 but it’s not the kind of plane I usually make. On the other hand, the MiG-25 wasn’t able to intercept the SR-71 while the MiG-31 could. The 25 couldn’t fly fast enough or high enough to be able to do so

  • Mini Gripen 5.8 years ago

    @Johnnydaun of course! Your builds are fantastic! I wish I could fly with mods but I play on iOS so sadly it’s not possible

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @LockheedLover from a Lockheed fan I would have expected a twin SR-71 request hahaha

  • ATR 72-600v2 5.8 years ago

    Whoa! The fact that this only has 2 upvotes and less than 100 downloads is a crime! You should reupload it but with a better screenshot showing more of the plane! It would get a lot more attention I think

  • Hawker Typhoon 5.8 years ago

    @SimplyPlain it’s quite easy to build them with minimal parts actually. I uploaded an unlisted build of mine which uses them and some scaled down wings. You can scavenge those parts if you’d like or just see how to make it in a simple way. They aren’t perfect, hence why I haven’t uploaded it but they’re decent enough. Would you like me to tag you in it?

  • Hawker Typhoon 5.8 years ago

    This is really nice! My pet panzer IV saw this and ran for cover! The one thing I would make different is to either expose the control surfaces or make custom moveable ones. Fantastic job nonetheless!

  • F4-B(1) 5.8 years ago

    @ShiptyTheLucario it’s unlisted so only you can see it :)

  • Can someone please make this float properly? 5.8 years ago

    @Odst578xl small floatplanes are quite tricky to make. I remember a couple years ago I was trying to make a swordfish and I had the exact same issues

  • BUG FIXES WE NEED NOW 5.8 years ago

    Is this for mobile as well?

  • Air display team 5.8 years ago

    This is wonderfully done! Very very cool

  • Mini Gripen 5.8 years ago

    To make it more stable, move the CoM forward

  • Mini Gripen 5.8 years ago

    Hard to fly but exceptionally cool!

  • Saab J29 Tunnan 5.8 years ago

    This is a rare fighter to see on here. I’m glad you made a nice one though! Swedes make very nice aircraft

  • JA 37 Viggen 5.8 years ago

    Whoa I love this! Great build of a great plane

  • F-18 Blue Angel Display team 5.8 years ago

    This is really really cool! I love it when people make formations with aircraft like this

  • Krakabloan Desert Interceptor Mk.II 5.8 years ago

    Cool looking jet!

  • SBC Helldiver 5.8 years ago

    Cool!

  • F4-B(1) 5.8 years ago

    Nice looking plane! It flies well too. The one thing I would change is the disproportionate size of the wings to the body. That would make it look better.

  • Cobra Manuever 5.8 years ago

    Ahh yes, I really needed a wellington that could hammerhead. In all fairness, this is a really good stunt plane now hahaha

  • HEATER 5.8 years ago

    You should definitely make this fly

  • Gator13 5.8 years ago

    This one is also really good. You might want to connect the front elevator to your pitch control. It will be more manoeuvrable that way

  • Gator15 5.8 years ago

    This is a really cool build! It looks like something you would see in a movie about a dystopian future. Nice work!

  • Gator 11 5.8 years ago

    Whoa this is really cool! Very different than the aircraft it says it’s it’s predecessor hahaha. Well made for one of your first uploads!

  • AC-M47E Libellule 5.8 years ago

    @BogdanX everyone in the RAF I have spoken to seems hopeful this will actually be made, especially since other countries have offered to join in on the project. I’m also hopeful that this will result in an actual combat aircraft rather than just an experiment. As regards to BVR combat, it’s talked about time and time again but there always ends up being “dogfights” for one reason or another. Either mistakes are made or rules are set in place like those for the Vietnam war. Either way, the future sure does seem interesting when it comes to combat planes.

  • Mercury Class Cruiser 5.8 years ago

    @EvilRaven31 I was wondering what those were for if they couldn’t launch!

  • Spring Car 5.8 years ago

    @MrReact it looks really good apart from the fact that it’s not centred at the top hahaha. I’m looking forward to seeing your future builds

  • AC-M47E Libellule 5.8 years ago

    @BogdanX whoa I had no idea the X-36 was so light! It didn’t look very heavy but that’s around the empty weight of the PA-28s I fly. I won’t look at that plane the same anymore hahaha. If you look at the newly proposed Tempest II for the RAF though, you’ll see it’s tails are fairly small for its size and if I remember correctly, it’s supposed to be very manoeuvrable. However, they’ve only just made mockups so things are bound to change as they almost always do.

  • Boulton Paul Allegiant 5.8 years ago

    This is really neat! I like the normal version already and you made it somewhat cooler!

  • Blowback Gun - Bottom fed Mag v1.0 5.8 years ago

    The reason I’d prefer most guns to this one in real life is because when you have a malfunction and you eject a cartridge, it won’t blow you up one it hits the floor hahaha

  • Mercury Class Cruiser 5.8 years ago

    Pretty cool build. Very unusual but in a good way

  • AC-M47E Libellule 5.8 years ago

    @BogdanX I don’t play war thunder so I wouldn’t know what it’s like there, you seem to assume things a little fast and take everything as a personal attack lol. I specifically said I’m not saying you’re wrong but from reading and documentary watching, I heard that it could perform manoeuvres that were very good for jet aircraft of its time. Anyways, the plane also only crashed during the test flight because of engine failure (it caught fire) so it wasn’t so much to do with structural issues. The first one which crashed was also a glider and that was more of a crash landing due to pilot error. Also yes I know the Horton was developed for the 3x1000 requirements.
    On to the other point you made, it does seem really weird that the new jets being developed have tails when their main goal is to be stealthy. Planes like the X-36 showed it was possible but maybe there is just too much risk or uncertainty.

  • La-2 5.8 years ago

    This is really cool! You should add moveable ailerons and elevators. That would make this perfect! Wonderfully made!

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @DaDerpachu123 I thought about making a twin version of a bomber of some sort. I’m not sure which one I will do yet but at some point I will upload one

  • AC-M47E Libellule 5.8 years ago

    @BogdanX I’m not saying you’re wrong but what about the Ho 229? This plane was designed as a fighter and by all accounts, it had fantastic manoeuvrability for a jet aircraft of its time. Understandably modern aircraft go through more Gs so they need something extra to stabilise them but how did this work on the Horton?

  • AC-M47E Libellule 5.8 years ago

    This is really cool! Flies pretty realistically and looks like it could be real as well. Very nicely made engines too.

  • DM-21F "Mel" 5.8 years ago

    This is really great! I love the detail you put into this with the writing and tail art. The cockpit is also a great addition to this. It looks like an advanced trainer or ground attack aircraft to me and a very good one too! Well done!