@DaDerpachu123 thank you for your kind comment! I suppose you figured it out yourself but the planes aren’t really related other than that they share the style of build many soviet aircraft developers were using. This plane is essentially an upgraded Su-9 which was developed at roughly the same time as the MiG-21 but for different roles. I hope that answers your question!
@LockheedLover I’ll do my best on the Electra 10 but it’s not the kind of plane I usually make. On the other hand, the MiG-25 wasn’t able to intercept the SR-71 while the MiG-31 could. The 25 couldn’t fly fast enough or high enough to be able to do so
@thefalkenreich you do realise that this plane is better than any you have made right? Why hate on people for no reason? If you have constructive criticism that’s great but there is no reason to be rude and immature like that. Grow up buddy
Whoa! The fact that this only has 2 upvotes and less than 100 downloads is a crime! You should reupload it but with a better screenshot showing more of the plane! It would get a lot more attention I think
@SimplyPlain it’s quite easy to build them with minimal parts actually. I uploaded an unlisted build of mine which uses them and some scaled down wings. You can scavenge those parts if you’d like or just see how to make it in a simple way. They aren’t perfect, hence why I haven’t uploaded it but they’re decent enough. Would you like me to tag you in it?
This is really nice! My pet panzer IV saw this and ran for cover! The one thing I would make different is to either expose the control surfaces or make custom moveable ones. Fantastic job nonetheless!
To help with taking off, you should make the wheel traction as low as possible. With some adjustments, take off should be easier. Also make this a lot lighter and remove the jet. Then add another prop to the engines and more power as well as making propellor pitch control automatic instead of fixed. Also, if you want the plane to have this sort of tricycle landing gear, you’re going to want to move the wings a little back and possibly make the fuselage a little longer. If you want the wings where they are, maybe go for a tail dragged design. I did some quick changes to one if you’d like me to upload it for you unlisted. I hope that helps!
Nice looking plane! It flies well too. The one thing I would change is the disproportionate size of the wings to the body. That would make it look better.
@BogdanX everyone in the RAF I have spoken to seems hopeful this will actually be made, especially since other countries have offered to join in on the project. I’m also hopeful that this will result in an actual combat aircraft rather than just an experiment. As regards to BVR combat, it’s talked about time and time again but there always ends up being “dogfights” for one reason or another. Either mistakes are made or rules are set in place like those for the Vietnam war. Either way, the future sure does seem interesting when it comes to combat planes.
Great to see you’re still posting planes at least somewhat recently! How are you doing? Also I think this is now my favourite plane to fly on SP. it’s truly a work of art and is just a delight to fly.
@BogdanX whoa I had no idea the X-36 was so light! It didn’t look very heavy but that’s around the empty weight of the PA-28s I fly. I won’t look at that plane the same anymore hahaha. If you look at the newly proposed Tempest II for the RAF though, you’ll see it’s tails are fairly small for its size and if I remember correctly, it’s supposed to be very manoeuvrable. However, they’ve only just made mockups so things are bound to change as they almost always do.
The reason I’d prefer most guns to this one in real life is because when you have a malfunction and you eject a cartridge, it won’t blow you up one it hits the floor hahaha
This one looks pretty good as well! The wings should be a little larger I think and the landing gear could also do with some height. Other than that, this is super!
This is really good! Your elevator is fantastic and you have the overall shape done really well. Most people seem to make the wings go out too far but yours have a nice size, they just need to be straight at the back. The pitot tube also should be on top. I can tell you’re going to make very good aircraft
For one of your first posts this is excellent! One thing I would look at a little more is getting the general shape of the nose correct. Pretty nice otherwise!
@BogdanX I don’t play war thunder so I wouldn’t know what it’s like there, you seem to assume things a little fast and take everything as a personal attack lol. I specifically said I’m not saying you’re wrong but from reading and documentary watching, I heard that it could perform manoeuvres that were very good for jet aircraft of its time. Anyways, the plane also only crashed during the test flight because of engine failure (it caught fire) so it wasn’t so much to do with structural issues. The first one which crashed was also a glider and that was more of a crash landing due to pilot error. Also yes I know the Horton was developed for the 3x1000 requirements.
On to the other point you made, it does seem really weird that the new jets being developed have tails when their main goal is to be stealthy. Planes like the X-36 showed it was possible but maybe there is just too much risk or uncertainty.
Yet another wonderful build
The way you make these WWI era planes is fantastic!
This is a really cool build! You added a lot of detail that makes this plane look incredible
This is pretty nice! It’s a little unstable but then again, it is a flying wing. These are some of my favourite aircraft types to build
This is really fantastic. So simple yet so well made. Lovely job!
@DaDerpachu123 it’s much easier than you think! Take a look at some builds which use that technique and reverse engineer them. It will help with it
@DaDerpachu123 thank you for your kind comment! I suppose you figured it out yourself but the planes aren’t really related other than that they share the style of build many soviet aircraft developers were using. This plane is essentially an upgraded Su-9 which was developed at roughly the same time as the MiG-21 but for different roles. I hope that answers your question!
@LockheedLover I’ll do my best on the Electra 10 but it’s not the kind of plane I usually make. On the other hand, the MiG-25 wasn’t able to intercept the SR-71 while the MiG-31 could. The 25 couldn’t fly fast enough or high enough to be able to do so
@Evenstsrike333 chill buddy. It’s not a big deal
+1@Johnnydaun of course! Your builds are fantastic! I wish I could fly with mods but I play on iOS so sadly it’s not possible
@Evenstsrike333 hahaha that’s a bit far. Just ignore him. If you’re really bothered by him you can also block him too.
+2@Evenstsrike333 he’s a young kid so that’s why. He’ll realise it’s stupid to act like that
+1@thefalkenreich you do realise that this plane is better than any you have made right? Why hate on people for no reason? If you have constructive criticism that’s great but there is no reason to be rude and immature like that. Grow up buddy
+1@LockheedLover from a Lockheed fan I would have expected a twin SR-71 request hahaha
This is what I see in my sleep paralysis
+3Whoa! The fact that this only has 2 upvotes and less than 100 downloads is a crime! You should reupload it but with a better screenshot showing more of the plane! It would get a lot more attention I think
@SimplyPlain it’s quite easy to build them with minimal parts actually. I uploaded an unlisted build of mine which uses them and some scaled down wings. You can scavenge those parts if you’d like or just see how to make it in a simple way. They aren’t perfect, hence why I haven’t uploaded it but they’re decent enough. Would you like me to tag you in it?
This is really nice! My pet panzer IV saw this and ran for cover! The one thing I would make different is to either expose the control surfaces or make custom moveable ones. Fantastic job nonetheless!
@ShiptyTheLucario it’s unlisted so only you can see it :)
@Odst578xl small floatplanes are quite tricky to make. I remember a couple years ago I was trying to make a swordfish and I had the exact same issues
Pretty cool plane! I like your air breaks a lot but if you would show the ailerons moving, that would make this even better.
+2Is this for mobile as well?
This is wonderfully done! Very very cool
To make it more stable, move the CoM forward
Hard to fly but exceptionally cool!
This is a rare fighter to see on here. I’m glad you made a nice one though! Swedes make very nice aircraft
Whoa I love this! Great build of a great plane
This is really really cool! I love it when people make formations with aircraft like this
To help with taking off, you should make the wheel traction as low as possible. With some adjustments, take off should be easier. Also make this a lot lighter and remove the jet. Then add another prop to the engines and more power as well as making propellor pitch control automatic instead of fixed. Also, if you want the plane to have this sort of tricycle landing gear, you’re going to want to move the wings a little back and possibly make the fuselage a little longer. If you want the wings where they are, maybe go for a tail dragged design. I did some quick changes to one if you’d like me to upload it for you unlisted. I hope that helps!
+1Cool looking jet!
Cool!
Okay I just did some quick fixes to it. Do you want me to upload it unlisted and then tag you in it so you can post it if you want?
+1Nice looking plane! It flies well too. The one thing I would change is the disproportionate size of the wings to the body. That would make it look better.
Ahh yes, I really needed a wellington that could hammerhead. In all fairness, this is a really good stunt plane now hahaha
You should definitely make this fly
This one is also really good. You might want to connect the front elevator to your pitch control. It will be more manoeuvrable that way
This is a really cool build! It looks like something you would see in a movie about a dystopian future. Nice work!
Whoa this is really cool! Very different than the aircraft it says it’s it’s predecessor hahaha. Well made for one of your first uploads!
@BogdanX everyone in the RAF I have spoken to seems hopeful this will actually be made, especially since other countries have offered to join in on the project. I’m also hopeful that this will result in an actual combat aircraft rather than just an experiment. As regards to BVR combat, it’s talked about time and time again but there always ends up being “dogfights” for one reason or another. Either mistakes are made or rules are set in place like those for the Vietnam war. Either way, the future sure does seem interesting when it comes to combat planes.
Great to see you’re still posting planes at least somewhat recently! How are you doing? Also I think this is now my favourite plane to fly on SP. it’s truly a work of art and is just a delight to fly.
+1@EvilRaven31 I was wondering what those were for if they couldn’t launch!
@MrReact it looks really good apart from the fact that it’s not centred at the top hahaha. I’m looking forward to seeing your future builds
@BogdanX whoa I had no idea the X-36 was so light! It didn’t look very heavy but that’s around the empty weight of the PA-28s I fly. I won’t look at that plane the same anymore hahaha. If you look at the newly proposed Tempest II for the RAF though, you’ll see it’s tails are fairly small for its size and if I remember correctly, it’s supposed to be very manoeuvrable. However, they’ve only just made mockups so things are bound to change as they almost always do.
This is really neat! I like the normal version already and you made it somewhat cooler!
The reason I’d prefer most guns to this one in real life is because when you have a malfunction and you eject a cartridge, it won’t blow you up one it hits the floor hahaha
This one looks pretty good as well! The wings should be a little larger I think and the landing gear could also do with some height. Other than that, this is super!
+1This is really good! Your elevator is fantastic and you have the overall shape done really well. Most people seem to make the wings go out too far but yours have a nice size, they just need to be straight at the back. The pitot tube also should be on top. I can tell you’re going to make very good aircraft
+1For one of your first posts this is excellent! One thing I would look at a little more is getting the general shape of the nose correct. Pretty nice otherwise!
+1Pretty cool build. Very unusual but in a good way
@BogdanX I don’t play war thunder so I wouldn’t know what it’s like there, you seem to assume things a little fast and take everything as a personal attack lol. I specifically said I’m not saying you’re wrong but from reading and documentary watching, I heard that it could perform manoeuvres that were very good for jet aircraft of its time. Anyways, the plane also only crashed during the test flight because of engine failure (it caught fire) so it wasn’t so much to do with structural issues. The first one which crashed was also a glider and that was more of a crash landing due to pilot error. Also yes I know the Horton was developed for the 3x1000 requirements.
On to the other point you made, it does seem really weird that the new jets being developed have tails when their main goal is to be stealthy. Planes like the X-36 showed it was possible but maybe there is just too much risk or uncertainty.