21.5k MsMuseumJanitor Comments

  • North American XF-51 one month ago

    @Pakdaaircraftindustries is there still some negotiation room for me to squeeze in? what if you allow fusalage wings but you need to deduct 0.2 - 0.5 in all categories of the rating system?

  • North American XF-51 one month ago

    @Pakdaaircraftindustries, nevermind actually I'll just post it normally since you clearly stated it


    "It can't have a VR cockpit or custom fuselage wings! Neither it can have Custom weapons (you can change the name and parameters of the default weapons)"


  • North American XF-51 one month ago

    @Pakdaaircraftindustries I'm actually thinking of posting another one since it's part of the rules. also thanks for the good rating, I hope I can still exploit thee loopholes again ;)

  • Simple but cool challenge! [CLOSED] one month ago

    Can I participate? what if I lessen the small details and replace it with fuselage wings to make it semi realistic

  • Sikorsky, biggest helicopter in the US arsenal one month ago

    @DasAbhinab I actually have a Blackhawk just not the seahawk with the landing gear and grey finish

  • Sikorsky, biggest helicopter in the US arsenal one month ago

    @Kav Sure I can tag you and no worries I'll probably figure it out. I'll it post tomorrow

    +1
  • Sikorsky, biggest helicopter in the US arsenal one month ago

    @Kav very near to posting, it still needs tweaks and fixes. also do you know how to solve the vibration? I've already set it past the maximum and went straight to 5 instead of 2.5 yet it still vibrates..

    +1
  • Sukhoi is big one month ago

    @Kav thanks

    +1
  • Sukhoi is big one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph thanks but it's already past 100 parts and it's still not true super maneuverability because if it were a true cobra the canards would be facing the front, it's still got some tweakin to do. thanks :)

    +1
  • Navantia SMART-6000 one month ago

    @Andyj15 because I don't have the time or capabilities to arm an entire warship, I intend to use this as target practice or props

  • Su-27SM one month ago

    tag me next time too

    +1
  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @ChaseRacliot I do have a Mig-21 but it's the one used for the Tu-144 wing tests

    +1
  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @DasAbhinab Tejas Mk-1 is postponed for now since the airframe is not at the optimal performance, I'll be delaying Tejas for other projects

    +1
  • Rockwell B-1b Lancer one month ago

    @LTHank the windows are giving me nightmares because I am not accustomed to those types of windows

  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @MobileBuilder21 I think these will do

  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @Boeing727200F nuclear pipe bomb

    +1
  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph I'll try after I finish my current one

    +1
  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @DasAbhinab ohh I never touched blender before. for the SP controls.. it'll probably be fine

  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @DasAbhinab yes, I am on it. but I underestimated the little guy because it has the most complex wing shape I've ever encountered. it's very deceiving at a glance

    +1
  • Open to suggestions because I ran out one month ago

    @Kav hmmm, I did build a fictional 'variant' of it. but messed up the acceleration=top speed thingy which I can't fix because everytime I get a good acceleration or top speed it's at that point that you don't lose too much speed when pitching hard

    +1
  • Rockwell B-1b Lancer 2 months ago

    @MomoDesigns hmmm.. not sure

  • Rockwell B-1b Lancer 2 months ago

    @ZealousKestrel the device is just old

  • Rockwell B-1b Lancer 2 months ago

    @ZealousKestrel hmm, my device crashes at 700

  • Rockwell B-1b Lancer 2 months ago

    @B1, here it is

  • Rockwell B-1b Lancer 2 months ago

    sorry everyone for going pass 105 parts which for me is not 'simple'

  • Mikoyan Mig-29 Fulcrum 2 months ago

    @Nonso thanks

    +1
  • Mikoyan Mig-29 Fulcrum 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab yeah sure, add pylons/hardpoints

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-160M BlackJack 2 months ago

    @B1 Sure, I'll try

    +2
  • Tupolev Tu-160M BlackJack 2 months ago

    @ZealousKestrel pffft I say it's not the best but at least not the worse :)

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-160M BlackJack 2 months ago

    I just realized that the wing roots where it blends with the fuselage is a bit too thick...

  • Mikoyan Mig-29 Fulcrum 2 months ago

    @Kav thanks :)

    +1
  • Ilyushin IL-76 Candid 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab I'll try, but it's probably gonna take me 5-8 days since I'm busy

    +1
  • Ilyushin IL-76 Candid 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab what variant?

  • Ilyushin IL-76 Candid 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab not really, it's actually just an Su-30SM with changed colors but don't plan on publishing yet it since it's not 'simple' enough for me. plus I'm working on other stuff like things from beriev

    +1
  • Northrop B-2a Spirit 2 months ago

    @Ihateuglyplanedesign, I have improved since last year

    +1
  • Northrop B-2a Spirit 2 months ago

    @SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore yep, except the pilots get a slightly better view because of the windows being ever so slightly taller..

  • Northrop B-2a Spirit 2 months ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph hahaha lol, literally 😂

    +1
  • Sukhoi Su-25 Grach 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab I did not know that.... I'm so sorry, my fault.

    +1
  • Sukhoi Su-25 Grach 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab, here is the Su-25. I couldn't make it fully stabilized, it wobbles a bit..

    +1
  • FA-18F Super Hornet 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab okay, I'll try to make it

    +1
  • FA-18F Super Hornet 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab also what Su-25? the one with the bigger cockpit that is colored blue?

  • FA-18F Super Hornet 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab ohh sure I'll try :)

  • FA-18F Super Hornet 2 months ago

    @DasAbhinab I'll try, expect it in 4 days. also what's fully stabilized mean??

  • F-16C Viper 2 months ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph aww dammit.. maybe next time for the F-117 nighthawk, I've got a new building technique for the panels I want to try

    +1
  • F-16C Viper 2 months ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph, are PEA and Low part builds under 100 parts? if so I'm setting a new rule for myself to not exceed 100 parts

    +1
  • F-16C Viper 2 months ago

    Also when you are in the cockpit cam, THERES A PERSON

    +1
  • what do you think when you hear the word "Aromatic Ginger" 2 months ago

    can I use 'PEA' in my title for a project? it's bellow 100 parts

    +1
  • Independence Class LCS 3 months ago

    @Indo666 yeah, I didn't really do the code, I just copied it from a forum post after autoaim turrets. I'm not that good in that area

  • Independence Class LCS 3 months ago

    @MomoDesigns ah.. the nostalgia is coming back