14.3k MsMuseumJanitor Comments

  • [TGT_AIRSHIP] T2 Type-IIB Aerial Destroyer VAN Hursoye 12 days ago

    I have a question, why are the guns on the top along side the bridge and other components?

    It makes it top heavy and could flip over, maybe try making an airship with one front turret with the mechanics similar to how the bottom ball gunner on the B-29 so it can point down a bit, up a bit, and on the sides a bit. Also place the engines, props and other stuff on the other end to 'stabilize' the weight of the turret, the bridge should be under and just a few meters behind the main cannon from the airship to get greater visual cover and a smaller secondary bridge on the top for top view, the AA would be on the sides along with 2-4 secondary cannons 2 on each side. Worth noting that whatever gas is lifting inside it probably not gonna lift it. :)

    Anyways here's my upvote, it's very nice

  • Tu-22M3 Backfire-C 28 days ago

    @BuildModifier thanks, but there are much much much more realistic both physically and function.. mine is more for AI control, simple and easy to fly

  • Su-35S with TVC one month ago

    @Luchibat6 yeah, I'm somewhat responsible for the wonky housing because I just used an intake and connected it to the fuselage, but thanks again :)

  • Su-35S with TVC one month ago

    @Luchibat6 no worries, it's fine. Also the TVC you implemented is pretty good, thanks bruv ;)

  • Sikorsky UH-60 Black hawk one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph thanks, it's my first 'successful' main rotor and tail rotor helicopter :)

    +1
  • Sikorsky UH-60 Black hawk one month ago

    @Convex it's perfect on other eyes, from the creators point of view it's only flaws.. thanks :))

  • 1.000!!!! one month ago

    @Attach055 np :)

  • 1.000!!!! one month ago

    Congrats bruv ;)

  • Sikorsky UH-60 Black hawk one month ago

    @MonsNotTheMonster go ahead, also note that activate 1 gyro is level 1 stability, and activate 2 is level 2 stiff stability. :)

    +1
  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @SumateraIndustries lol haha 😂

  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @LunarEclipseSP teach me how you do it :))

    +1
  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @dekanii you gave me an idea ;)
    @SuperSuperTheSylph I'll do something commercial :)

    +1
  • Tu-22M3 Backfire-C one month ago

    @SPWithLizzie lol 😂

    +1
  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph what's better to build a cold war fighter or something commercial for once? I am thinking of what to build

    +1
  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @JayStream Adam pak

    +1
  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @Bugati87 yeap 👍

  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph I think it's on par with the Northrop B-2a's width but noticeably longer in length, so it's technically skinnier than the B-2a ;)

    +1
  • PAK DAM one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph haha, I thought so too :)

    +1
  • kir f-3 target one month ago

    @Morsele ah okay, also it's like the gripen in what it's meant for right? Fast reaction, simple, for defense not offense?

  • kir f-3 target one month ago

    @Morsele I want to join but I used translator and my school year is coming up, I'd join if it was English and if I was in an academic break. ;')

  • kir f-3 target one month ago

    It's very nice with the delta-canard configuration and low part, though the landing gear looks a bit small :)

  • Tu-22M3 Backfire-C one month ago

    @Mitterbin thanks ;)

    +1
  • Tu-22M3 Backfire-C one month ago

    @Bugati87 yep :)

  • Tu-22M3 Backfire-C one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph it's not better, it's unique. Each replica or any aircraft by another user is unique and has his or her fingerprint not better nor worse, unique. And yes I try very hard to go below 100 parts but constantly fail due to over doing it sometimes or just make very smooth angles. Thanks again <3 <3

    +1
  • Tu-22M3 Backfire-C one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph thanks it's just a piston with throttle input nothing complicated and thanks again for the spotlights very appreciated<3

    +1
  • Su-57SK Korshun one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph yep ;)

    +1
  • Su-57SK Korshun one month ago

    @NotRob119 😂😂

    +1
  • Su-57SK Korshun one month ago

    @Convex your su 57 has a cockpit, ejection seat, psm mode and the LERX (Leading-Edge Root Extension. Mine is just looks and an angled intake, so yours is better in my opinion :)

  • Su-57SK Korshun one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph yep very sleek and even though it doesn't have a very realistic performance it looks like the AI actually conserves energy instead of just absolutely pulling the stick all the way to the back, and thanks again :) <3

    +1
  • Aegis Defense System one month ago

    @CrestelAeronautics very old post.., I may do a remake.

    +1
  • Su-57SK Korshun one month ago

    @Mitterbin thanks

    +1
  • Su-57SK Korshun one month ago

    Honestly, I'd say this is one of the worst front profiles I tried to replicate, and it's over 100 parts, flies like gravity doesn't exist, but at least it's off my back and yes the gun pod is floating.

    +2
  • YF-23 Black Widow II one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph ohhh, that's very useful thanks for the info, have a nice day :))

    +1
  • YF-23 Black Widow II one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph no problem, also I'm empty minded so I didn't actually have any plans for the last 19 hours, so I just did what you requested while trying to think on what to do next after this YF-23, and 19 hours still counts as 'near future' because it was the 'near future' when I said it back at the F-22 post. <3 <3

    +1
  • YF-23 Black Widow II one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph

    +1
  • YF-23 Black Widow II one month ago

    Also note: do not pull up too hard or else it will go to a spinny thing, not a falling leaf style.

    +2
  • Mikoyan Project 1.44 one month ago

    @50CalChicken yep

  • F-22 Raptor one month ago

    @Mitterbin thanks :)

    +1
  • F-22 Raptor one month ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph sure, maybe sometime in the near future. Sure :)

    +1
  • Mig-21i 'Strela' one month ago

    @wdjyyds yeah I based it off the Mig-21i analog which help test the.. delta wing? I think for the Tu-144

  • Su-35S one month ago

    @SumateraIndustries thanks :)

  • Su-35S one month ago

    @SyntheticL yes, it doesn't have it but I placed it there so I can just turn it into a Su-27 if I want to because I don't really know the differences of the two externally I just know the Su-35/27M has better electronics suite.

  • Su-35S one month ago

    @Mitterbin thanks :)

    +1
  • Mig-21i 'Strela' 2 months ago

    @Mitterbin thanks

    +1
  • Mikoyan Project 1.44 2 months ago

    @Mitterbin thanks

  • Btr-80NM [100 Parts] 2 months ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph thanks, take rest :)

    +1
  • Btr-80NM [100 Parts] 2 months ago

    @SuperSuperTheSylph thanks, and yes I actually forgot to soften. Thanks and sorry :)

    +1
  • Btr-80NM [100 Parts] 2 months ago

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 thanks. :)

  • [AI] Pod of Narco LPV 2 months ago

    @Hughey6576 np <3<3

  • [AI] Pod of Narco LPV 2 months ago

    @Hughey6576 on the ending of the lead sub there is a winch just take that away, it is connected to the other two. :)