Nice frontal armour angling, but just like most of the early tanks, the transmission and side armour looks very vulnerable to high-caliber gunfire, along with the optics. There isn't a machine gun to defend the tank against infantry, but it could be a great TD instead of an MBT.
@mikoyanster np, also, I noticed that there was a little detail where if you fiddle with the pitch axis of the prop, it displays some type of energy retention while climbing/cruising in flight.
@Maxwell1 Don't send hate to the build/creator, if you're going to make constructive criticism, go ahead, but I don't think it's a good idea to make a controversial, maybe hateful comment on it.
@MI Then stop trying to hurt the creator! For god's sake at least give them a little credit for the effort! You can't just turn your back because you think the whole point of the post is for questionable content, I, along with dozens of other people, the mods and the developers support this build for being well-built and made with effort. The fact that you hate it because you can't keep your eyes off of the lewd part is your problem.
@FastDan Indeed he is, you know why? Because it's a good creation, again stop focusing on the questionable stuff, it's you with the dirty mind if you think the creation is pointed only to be sexually suggestive, if you don't like it, don't look at it.
@AviownCorp OH lol, you have to mirror the whole wing, I thought you meant when you were doing a full-fold mirror.
Yeah it happens a lot :<
@breitling Tank you very much
It's not the Yak-7, it's the Jak-7
@AviownCorp Really? That doesn't happen to me.
Holy jesus that's a lot of stuff
+1(THAT DESCRIPTION AHAHA)
NNNNNooooooOOO STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP
+1If it's on a wing w/ a dihedral, then It might not work in some situations.
15/10
As much as I hate these things in War Thunder, I can't be mad at a well-built replica of it. Great work!
@Mustang51 Thanks! I'm glad you like it.
Alahooo
+4@TheLatentImage
mfw you give shoutouts to two of the most popular builders on the site
@BACconcordepilot I think it's SeanTurbineModifier's Hurricane...
+1Contragulashuns
@IAmMyBoss PineappleCannon
V war thunder players V
what?
Lower glacis looks a bit too big...
3
For a first try, it's really nice.
+1it's been there for a while
+1@CRJ900Pilot ok kool
@CRJ900Pilot Maybe I can help with those wings, I've learned a thing or two...
...And still no CRJ900.
Nice frontal armour angling, but just like most of the early tanks, the transmission and side armour looks very vulnerable to high-caliber gunfire, along with the optics. There isn't a machine gun to defend the tank against infantry, but it could be a great TD instead of an MBT.
+1Amazing, another cluttering forum post.
+1@mikoyanster np, also, I noticed that there was a little detail where if you fiddle with the pitch axis of the prop, it displays some type of energy retention while climbing/cruising in flight.
LOL no
+1Wings and fuselage mixed together looks a bit wonky, especially with the heavy armament under those thin wings, really nice plane though!
Your airliners never fail to impress...
WOW, very cool!
+1@RichardFazbear thank you!
10/10
@Duckw0rthplanes perhaps
@JBird Transformers 7
+1There is a god.
+2@breitling same
@Maxwell1 Alright then, just felt a bit off in my scope, I was a little heated up when the 'offended' people showed up.
+2@Maxwell1 Don't send hate to the build/creator, if you're going to make constructive criticism, go ahead, but I don't think it's a good idea to make a controversial, maybe hateful comment on it.
+1@Maxwell1 Stop the hate, my dude, they put in a lot of effort to make this.
+1@MrDoolittle n o u
Me: "One shot please"
Bartender: "Whiskey? Rum?"
Me: "9mm please"
@MI Then stop trying to hurt the creator! For god's sake at least give them a little credit for the effort! You can't just turn your back because you think the whole point of the post is for questionable content, I, along with dozens of other people, the mods and the developers support this build for being well-built and made with effort. The fact that you hate it because you can't keep your eyes off of the lewd part is your problem.
+1Well well well, a needless forum post. @TheLatentImage
@FastDan well, I like it because of the mechanization, try it out for yourself, the running animation is nothing short of amazing.
+1@MI Good, then stop thinking it should be removed.
+1@FastDan Indeed he is, you know why? Because it's a good creation, again stop focusing on the questionable stuff, it's you with the dirty mind if you think the creation is pointed only to be sexually suggestive, if you don't like it, don't look at it.
+1@MI @Blue0Bull Agreed, you don't make the rules here, you should not have the say on what can and what cannot be part of progress in this community.
+1@MI Andrew Garrison himself said it's not breaking the rules, so you're on your own right now.
+4