@OrangeConnor2 well, i mostly use feel, if something that goes 500kmh turns like a biplane, that's a problem, if you wanna know how much G atypical for airframe and arrangements, my PEAs are a good example of that
@DatTrainGuy19 yeah, public transit is damn convenient, peoples forget(or for Americans, never?) that. like, you're telling me i don't have to spend time, energy, and concentration like driving? sign me the fuck up, cycling is good but my knee sometimes glitches
@V ah alright, thanks, kinda had issues with pistons.. I wanna set it up to basically go from 0 to 1 with an input but it seems that's not possible with control bases right?
@ShinyGemsBro thanks lol; well... it's a vacuum cleaner that travels interdimensionally and interplanetary.. it's having a flu rn, idk how but it has a flu-
and that's why I save every single minute, imagine it like this... you are doing your super important alignment.. and you've succeeded! then you accidentally detached and dragged it somewhere. it's something like that taht makes me save every single minute, cause i know its only one fuckup away sometimes
I feel like the.. was it Belphegor? yeah that, might work for this... hmh...... problem is I'm pretty sure i would probably make it below 69 parts unironically because I'm like that-
(refer to my PEA series, low part, crude, and Part-Efficient Aircrafts for the general use with no lags, coughSelf-Promotioncough)
seriously though, is the minimum part unnegotiable like, 60 parts? that's the most amount I'm kinda willing to push up when my typical aircrafts are 50 parts below..
@Speedhunter depends, I'm gonna make a challenge soon(it'll end on July so pretty far, but it's relevant), the set of rules I've established is;
max 7 wing parts
max 70 parts
realistic performing; if not, atleast semi-realistic
no wingtip stall(a.k.a rolling when you pull the pitch, solve this by reducing the control surface of the pitch or reducing the angle)
it's not a solid rule, but it's a guideline, so 72 parts is fine, actual true max part count is 96 parts basing off MAPA's AI plane rules, but 70 is my max because well, simplicity; I do have a tenet of not going over 50 parts unless forced to(such is the case for Muromets, F1M2 and E15K)
i like very much, welcome aboard!
+1@CR929thenewSPplayer right up my alley then, i love obscure stuffs XD
+1@WritersCrusadersAirCo approved
+1@CR929thenewSPplayer I will make an exception since it has relatively low performance cost, approved!
+1@Graingy hm
+1@Eggplant approved! I liek ( > ~ < )
+1@Dracul0Anderson Sopwith Triplane Approved; modded to realistic specification, thanks! ( ^ ~ ^ )
+1@OrangeConnor2 well, i mostly use feel, if something that goes 500kmh turns like a biplane, that's a problem, if you wanna know how much G atypical for airframe and arrangements, my PEAs are a good example of that
+1oh, Warspite?
+1@Yish42 approved, I've gone with 2x 30mm and 2x 20mm setup since it's a bit chonk, i love how it handles too :3
+1@RomanThePlanesFan yea lol, it's more detail-saving
+1@ThomasRoderick will try lmao
+1@Majakalona it's an android able map, i think it was.. newland? a bit forgot
+1@HanakoSan it's already on the list, well.. the submarine variant anyway
+1still 1.5k away though, so quite far
+1edible
+1@Kerbango also, thanks man!
+1the predecessor darn cracks me up lmao
+1get spotlighted-
+1@DatTrainGuy19 yeah, public transit is damn convenient, peoples forget(or for Americans, never?) that. like, you're telling me i don't have to spend time, energy, and concentration like driving? sign me the fuck up, cycling is good but my knee sometimes glitches
+1@Majakalona in a sense, yes
+1I feel personally attacked- BUT THE PC GUYS HAVE IT BETTER THAN ME AAAAAAA
+1@Mousewithamachinegun123 yeee
+1@Graingy mornin
+1@V ah alright, thanks, kinda had issues with pistons.. I wanna set it up to basically go from 0 to 1 with an input but it seems that's not possible with control bases right?
+1@Harpyharold it literally is, have you not read the description?
+1@AF1 nah, maybe way way way in the future, those are old builds reposted back up
+1@Astro12 It is a Honor to serve.
+1(also thanks ( ^▽^ ))
@Astro12 I like this whimsy, it's official now.
+1@HanakoSan very obscure yes, barely had any information so it's just a guesswork or so it goes
+1@DatTrainGuy19 @Speedhunter ᵗʰᶦʳᵈ :3
+1@HanakoSan aw...
+1@malumcaedo can of whoopies indeed
+1@Graingy that, i agree; back then everyone gotta do the most devious and skillful ideas/stuff with so limited of ability..
+1@ShinyGemsBro ye
+1@ShinyGemsBro thanks lol; well... it's a vacuum cleaner that travels interdimensionally and interplanetary.. it's having a flu rn, idk how but it has a flu-
+1@Jsoeidm2 eee.. yeah? it's targets strictly though, so it's something you shoot at
+1and that's why I save every single minute, imagine it like this... you are doing your super important alignment.. and you've succeeded! then you accidentally detached and dragged it somewhere. it's something like that taht makes me save every single minute, cause i know its only one fuckup away sometimes
+1@WritersCrusadersAirCo hmh
+1@WritersCrusadersAirCo I'm still 2k far behind lol
+1@Kerbango noted; I'm just here to join for fun, idc if I'm not in top, it's available for my entry so i can tackle a few stuff at once, thanks!
+1@Speedhunter you want the eggships? i could DM you the xml, i still have it somehow..
+1@WritersCrusadersAirCo thanks, and chill, I'm taking my time nowadays, also, you're close to 30k so advance congratulations :3
+1@Hahahahaahahshs ah hm, i see
+1I feel like the.. was it Belphegor? yeah that, might work for this... hmh...... problem is I'm pretty sure i would probably make it below 69 parts unironically because I'm like that-
(refer to my PEA series, low part, crude, and Part-Efficient Aircrafts for the general use with no lags, cough Self-Promotion cough)
seriously though, is the minimum part unnegotiable like, 60 parts? that's the most amount I'm kinda willing to push up when my typical aircrafts are 50 parts below..
+1very interesting in design! i really love the look.. feels like it won't be out of place in a dieselpunk-ey world no?
+1@Speedhunter glad to have you onboard then!! ( >▽< )
+1@WinsWings my pleasure, it's fun to find a challenge that aligns with my current projects ( ^▽^ )
+1@Speedhunter depends, I'm gonna make a challenge soon(it'll end on July so pretty far, but it's relevant), the set of rules I've established is;
it's not a solid rule, but it's a guideline, so 72 parts is fine, actual true max part count is 96 parts basing off MAPA's AI plane rules, but 70 is my max because well, simplicity; I do have a tenet of not going over 50 parts unless forced to(such is the case for Muromets, F1M2 and E15K)
+1hehe fast
+1