It’s a shame curated crafts need to have such low performance cost. Granted I prolly go overboard with details but whats the point in be if you can’t provide the most realistic experience possible 😭
@TheAvgeekNextDoor there was an experimental 109 with pontoons called the 109w so ill just throw in a final modified 109f4 when i post my 209h and 109g-0. itll have a new paint scheme and of course pontoon/landing system but shoudlnt be anything special from my last few builds! i got a couple cool new ones in the works tho
@Noname918181818181818181 builds with lower performance cost may perform badly because of excessive amounts of moving parts/weird aerodynamics, but I suppose performance cost is prolly the best way of gauging its compatibility with vr
@AviationLoverGEEK444 me 209s were a group of experimental successor variants to the bf109g in late ww2 germany - i thought they looked cool so i went at it
inbred plane?
+12freaky trees
+12hola
+6can i steal your nose section for a 727 im makin
It’s a shame curated crafts need to have such low performance cost. Granted I prolly go overboard with details but whats the point in be if you can’t provide the most realistic experience possible 😭
+4@TheAvgeekNextDoor there was an experimental 109 with pontoons called the 109w so ill just throw in a final modified 109f4 when i post my 209h and 109g-0. itll have a new paint scheme and of course pontoon/landing system but shoudlnt be anything special from my last few builds! i got a couple cool new ones in the works tho
+4@Siiis because other people make better mobile friendly builds
+4@BaconEggs is this what they did to my dogs balls
+4Details!!
+4@Noname918181818181818181 builds with lower performance cost may perform badly because of excessive amounts of moving parts/weird aerodynamics, but I suppose performance cost is prolly the best way of gauging its compatibility with vr
+3@AviationLoverGEEK444 me 209s were a group of experimental successor variants to the bf109g in late ww2 germany - i thought they looked cool so i went at it
+3@keiyronelleavgeek566 idk man thats clearly a big star of david there
+3@ThatRandomCouchPotato make that two planes hehehe
+3part limit :(
+2We need more player content reviews
+2@AviationLoverGEEK444 maybe when sp2comes out! im stocked up rn
+2@SuperSuperTheSylph the double bubble
+2@SuperSuperTheSylph @Solent @TheAvgeekNextDoor
+2@Dragoranos do335 pookie
+2@BOSKnight YIPPEE <3 <3 <3
+2@AdlerSteiner much love pookie <3
+2Holy schmoly?
+2he left vtol on guys its somewhere near the moon rn
+2looks lovely. maybe a tad too dark/unsaturated
+2can you rebuild my parents marriage
+2@begula69 its okie :)
+2@TheAirAsiaA330 TRUE guys i didnt forget
+2@Diego76095 I’m lazy lmao
+2@Dissent3R @Solent19 @Boeing727200F
+2@NordicAerospace much love man. Means a lot ❤️
+2@Onat67 ill make a 1.6-2k part version for you
+2@TheAllNipponAirwaysA380
+2Based
+2im so lost, is it original?
+2@XanderMakesStuff shhhh it’s okay
+2@DELTAa330 Nice. Runs better than my 2010s laptop I bet
+2@TheMouse HIGH PART REPLICA CHALLENGE
+2if you want me to give a full run down of where the parts are coming from, Add me on discord - malone_92051
+2holy moly
+2@Majakalona more than you
+2@Noob101 @Mal0ne strap in guys theres a 3.8k build coming soon :3
+2@Noob101 yep the plane is in fact sinking into the map lol
+2moar parts
+2@Apollo018362 shhhhh
+2@SKLV95 hehehehe okie
+2*2200
+2hi can u up the part limit to 2300 :3333
+2beautiful shape man, might have to steal some building techniques
+2damn I’ll have to see how mine compared hahahaha! Lovely work
+1How many more creator content videos will be made?
+1@DEUTSCH good idea yeah
+1