Looks 5/10 looks like one of my 5 yr old Lego creations
Functionality: 8/10 is rather slow and takes a bit of time to take off, but it can rapid fire rocket pods and infernos and has a pretty cool targeting pod
13/20
Looks 3/10 helllll a ugly
Functionality 4/10 is slow, takes 4 ever to take off, and yes at has a few torpedos, but they're only enough to take out the USS Beast, and the you have the destroyers to deal with. :(
Total score 7/20 🤮
Looks: 7/10 is pretty detailed, but has no cockpit view :/
Functionality: 6/10 is extremely maneuverable and can acetate in the blink of an eye, but only has 2 cannons, and with no cockpit view, aiming them is a pain in the butt. :(
Final score: 13//20. At least you tried
Looks 6/10 The cockpit view wasn't that detailed, and you could try using fuesalage
to make the wings. It looks a lot better
Functionality 9/10 has a lot of cannon rounds, swing wings, and a few bombs and missiles. That's all I needed to hear
@BOSSentinel
Sorry about this...
Looks 3/10, not aerodynamic, has extremely blocky wings, and the gun on the nose is very ugly :(
Functionality 5/10. For what it is (which I'm assuming is a early cold war dive bomber) it has 3 machine guns 2 bomb 25s, and 2 low power cannons. This is not a lot of weapons, and they honestly can't do that much damage.
It also has no flares, so it's cooked if it goes against any modern planes.
Sorry this entire comment was basically criticism, but you are also flirting with the no ww2 rule so just consider that as well.
Looks 7/10 very detailed, but doesn't have a cockpit view
Functionality 9/10 For a bomber, very maneuverable, has a lot of flares and is pretty fast. The only thing holding it back is that I think it could have more weapons
Total score 16 out of 20 Good job!
@BOSSentinel ok
First place!!!!!!!!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😱😱😱😱😊😱😱😊😊
@planezandstuff go into the overload of the rotators, go to input controller and change it from VTOL to "FireWeapons"
@Bugati87 I mean to be tagged
@Bugati87 ok I didn't ask
@SupremeDorian ok sorry
@Bugati87 why
@Zilozite frog...foot 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
@supersoli8
@supremedorian
@rb107
@dabestock
@bosknight
@bosential
@YuYsukablyat ok
@YuYsukablyat hate to break it to you, but that's a pretty bad rating
@Kingsman472 oh cool but still meh
Looks 5/10 looks like one of my 5 yr old Lego creations
Functionality: 8/10 is rather slow and takes a bit of time to take off, but it can rapid fire rocket pods and infernos and has a pretty cool targeting pod
13/20
@YuYsukablyat one other question, how do you make it so that you can rapid fire rocket pods and infernos like that? Pls tell me!!!
Honestly I don't know what you expected
Looks 3/10 helllll a ugly
Functionality 4/10 is slow, takes 4 ever to take off, and yes at has a few torpedos, but they're only enough to take out the USS Beast, and the you have the destroyers to deal with. :(
Total score 7/20 🤮
Looks: 7/10 is pretty detailed, but has no cockpit view :/
Functionality: 6/10 is extremely maneuverable and can acetate in the blink of an eye, but only has 2 cannons, and with no cockpit view, aiming them is a pain in the butt. :(
Final score: 13//20. At least you tried
Looks 6/10 The cockpit view wasn't that detailed, and you could try using fuesalage
to make the wings. It looks a lot better
Functionality 9/10 has a lot of cannon rounds, swing wings, and a few bombs and missiles. That's all I needed to hear
Total score: 15/20 respectable
@Zilozite I also entered this challenge... Except mine's 6th gen 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
(Also how do you add screenshots to the description I need to know)
@XM803ENJOYER46 what trend?? (I don't use TikTok or Instagram so I have no idea what you mean)
@Zilozite sorry
@XM803ENJOYER46 thanks
@XM803ENJOYER46 I'm even more confused... Do you even know what a su 57 looks like?!?!?!
@SPWithLizzie fair enough
@Zilozite No... What if you are him?!?!?!
😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
Looks like flanker, why'd you name it after su 25 tho
@XM803ENJOYER46 or throw a alligator into a Wendy's drive thru window
@EagleMan010 He can also rob a Walmart in a Darth Vader costume
@EagleMan010 He can do whatever you want him to do
@BOSKINGHT
@schmoovebrain
@carguy32sp
@BOSSentinel oh well I made it in like 5 minute's so that
makes sense
@SukhoiisLegend joined yesterday
@SukhoiisLegend better than my a 6 lol
@CarGuy32SP c'est vraiment cool
@BOSSentinel ok well Switzerland was always neutral so what were they doing making a trainer/attacker anyways
@Erionh yeah, it is!
@BOSSentinel well, whatever
@CarGuy32SP oui
@BOSSentinel bruh it does not. F 104 has wingspan of like 2 meters
@CarGuy32SP and Russian, and English, and a little spanish
@BOSSentinel ok, well unfortunately I grade on usefulness and realisim, so sorry about low rating
@CarGuy32SP Merci beaucoup Mon Ami (french Speedrun vibes)
@BOSSentinel I guess wings are 2 m shorter than real su 25, but it's also 2 m shorter, so it should balance out
@SchmooveBrain oh well thanks :)
@BOSSentinel it's 2 meters shorter than a real su 25!!!! ITS NOT LONG!!!
@BOSSentinel ok well that doesn't really change my rating
@bosknight
@rb107
@aviationgeeklover444
@BOSSentinel
Looks 3/10 I have no words...
Functionality 7/10 does have quite a few toys to use on enemies, but isn't that maneuverable
Total score 10/20
@BOSSentinel
Sorry about this...
Looks 3/10, not aerodynamic, has extremely blocky wings, and the gun on the nose is very ugly :(
Functionality 5/10. For what it is (which I'm assuming is a early cold war dive bomber) it has 3 machine guns 2 bomb 25s, and 2 low power cannons. This is not a lot of weapons, and they honestly can't do that much damage.
It also has no flares, so it's cooked if it goes against any modern planes.
Sorry this entire comment was basically criticism, but you are also flirting with the no ww2 rule so just consider that as well.
Total score 8/20 sorry dude.
@RB107
Looks 7/10 very detailed, but doesn't have a cockpit view
Functionality 9/10 For a bomber, very maneuverable, has a lot of flares and is pretty fast. The only thing holding it back is that I think it could have more weapons
Total score 16 out of 20 Good job!