Auto Credit Based on SleepyKitty's AIR TO GROUND PLANE CHALLENGE (Closed)
Yourpanese trainer from the 1940’s..
the irl plane was the 1960’s though.
Details
- 3 seater
- A rear gunner! Made by pakda
- Attacker trainer.
- Minigun instead of two 7.5mms…
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor AIR TO GROUND PLANE CHALLENGE (Closed)
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 31.2ft (9.5m)
- Length 28.0ft (8.5m)
- Height 7.3ft (2.2m)
- Empty Weight 5,673lbs (2,573kg)
- Loaded Weight 7,362lbs (3,339kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.135
- Wing Loading 36.4lbs/ft2 (177.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 202.5ft2 (18.8m2)
- Drag Points 2978
Parts
- Number of Parts 66
- Control Surfaces 8
- Performance Cost 360
@SPWithLizzie
Uncultured, cultured
@SchmooveBrain
Just to really emphasise everyone
@SPWithLizzie
okay, jevil, jevil
But the real question is, is
Why did you specify specify everyone twice twice?
@SPWithLizzie fair enough
@SleepyKitty
They defended their airspace from everyone
Everyone
So they needed planes to defend airspace
@BOSSentinel ok well Switzerland was always neutral so what were they doing making a trainer/attacker anyways
@SleepyKitty wdym realism..? The Swiss, Who built this plane’s IRL counterpart, didn’t have jets until the very late 60’s. This plane, wasn’t ment to fight modern planes. It was designed for WW2, used in the 1950’s. And the usefulness is completely irrelevant, as you or I might think. Useful could mean a lot of things.
@BOSSentinel ok, well unfortunately I grade on usefulness and realisim, so sorry about low rating
@SleepyKitty also, my “style” that I use is simple.. [I.E. no fuselage wings and little XML]
@BOSSentinel ok well that doesn't really change my rating
@SleepyKitty it’s a trainer and an early 1950’s attacker.
@BOSSentinel
Sorry about this...
Looks 3/10, not aerodynamic, has extremely blocky wings, and the gun on the nose is very ugly :(
Functionality 5/10. For what it is (which I'm assuming is a early cold war dive bomber) it has 3 machine guns 2 bomb 25s, and 2 low power cannons. This is not a lot of weapons, and they honestly can't do that much damage.
It also has no flares, so it's cooked if it goes against any modern planes.
Sorry this entire comment was basically criticism, but you are also flirting with the no ww2 rule so just consider that as well.
Total score 8/20 sorry dude.
@SPWithLizzie its technically call the C-36, but I am not going though 400 hours of digging, so I looked on the wiki, and it said the one with retractable landing gear was called… well this.
@BOSKnight
Dude
The first few results are literally your plane
But still, makes some sense
@SPWithLizzie its a “replica” of sorts. Like This
@BOSKnight
Yes, but it has a propeller, so it's a propeller driven aircraft, trainer or not
Also why is it tagged as Switzerland?
@SPWithLizzie Trainer
@BOSKnight
Still, it has props, so prop plane
@SPWithLizzie its a ground attack trainer:
Look so cool
So we either have jets that are definitely to advanced for the 50's
Or this 1942 lookin prop plane
@BOSKnight
Yeah, I don't wanna deal with him
@RepublicofWrightIsles sorry. I was strapped on time.
@BOSKnight no credits?
@RepublicofWrightIsles yes. Sorry!