4,290 Lixcuudis Comments

  • JAPANESE YOKOSUKA KAMIKAZE OHKA 3.5 years ago

    Oh lord that explosion is gigantic, how many tonnes of TNT are packed into that one bomb?

  • P-36 Hawk 3.5 years ago

    Neat plane! For what it is, it actually flies pretty realistically funnily enough.

  • Wanna see my drawing? 3.5 years ago

    Always happy to see someone do traditional art, love it!

  • TANK 3.5 years ago

    Neat build, love it!

    +1
  • backless stool 3.5 years ago

    Okay who the heck featured this, it's glorious but still lol

  • How would do you stop detachers from getting affected by G's? 3.5 years ago

    SOLVED: Made it so that a part is destroyed by a wing gun, that said part is what connects the wing to the fuselage.

  • How would do you stop detachers from getting affected by G's? 3.5 years ago

    @rexrexThezion @RankStarfish201 It's not a problem with rotators, its a detacher like I said. The mass of the detacher itself is 1 ( I even tried setting it to 2). As for drag, I'll see if turning off it for the entire wing would do anything. I'm pretty sure this is affected by G's though, not drag, but it's worth a try.

  • Multiple inputs? 3.5 years ago

    @edensk Thank you so much!

    +1
  • Multiple inputs? 3.5 years ago

    @rexrexThezion https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/2r9VZe/Updated-Mitsubishi-Ki-51-Sonia unlisted build acquired

  • Am I making a realistic car for once? ( teaser) 3.5 years ago

    @PapaKernels It's most likely cause you set the the suspension's mass to 0. If not that, I'm not sure.

  • Grandeur Guide 3.5 years ago

    @rexrexThezion Do whatever you feel is best, I don't mind

  • Grandeur Guide 3.5 years ago

    @rexrexThezion Sorry for tagging you here. I just wanted to ask you something, and the comments here aren't too crowded. Since I don't want to get this wrong again, do you think you could do a 'flight test' of one the builds I'm working on to see if the flight characteristics are accurate? I fined tuned the build to the best of my abilities, but I'm not entirely sure if it's spot on or way off. Thank you for reading this, and sorry if I wasted your time. You'll be credited for flight testing as well, when it gets posted.

    Craft: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/R34EAD/Mitsubishi-Ki-51-Sonia

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @WarHawk95 D’accord, I’ll give it a go then. I might have some trouble talking, but I’ll try!

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @WarHawk95 I wish I could, but I don’t think I know enough french (since I’m still learning)

  • Golden Hornet [5k CELEBRATION!] 3.5 years ago

    Congrats on gold!

    +1
  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @HeavyHeavytheC22 That may or may have not been the aircraft I heavily based this on, I can't build anything without a few references for the life of me lol

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @WarHawk95 Oui, mais pas beacoup

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @rexrexThezion for some reason all the first few comments were removed. No idea why that happened though, i havent touched them.

  • S.7A-2 Biplane Fighter 3.5 years ago

    Great build, flies incredibly well!

    +1
  • XPco is now hiring! 3.5 years ago

    Finally, I can engage minimal social interaction, count me in .

  • XPco is now hiring! 3.5 years ago

    Does joining include the sign-on bonus of what some may refer to as (tell me if I'm wrong) 'friends?' imlonely

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @DarDragon Yeah, a conflict started to spark up, thankfully it didn't escalate all too much

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @rexrexThezion I'll try.

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @WiiMini @rexrexThezion I mean, I never really wanted to get involved in any drama, but rex was kind of right about me neglecting the fact about reducing drag and power. It's something I asked how to solve before (which he answered), but just didn't have the motivation to put the effort into applying into this build. So he was in right for pointing some of those things out. Thank you for supporting me, though, Wii. I appreciate it.

  • Grandeur Fortuna 3.5 years ago

    @WiiMini It barely compares to other builds with a similar part counts, though lol

  • MP WAR Event!! 3.6 years ago

    I plan on going, if time allows. It’s no guarantee, but I’ll try!

  • MiG-28 aka F-5, a Ruski Tiger 3.6 years ago

    T, it looks amazing!

  • why do this always happen when i'm building? 3.6 years ago

    When that happens, I usually just reload the build. It’s inconvenient, but its a fix nonetheless.

    +1
  • Trouble getting past the 'creative block' 3.6 years ago

    Sorry the grammar and construction is horrible, I was just had to speak my mind out.

  • MIG_21i Analog 3.6 years ago

    Pas de probleme @MRpingouin

  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21PF Fishbed 3.6 years ago

    You should give blueprints a try, it could help get some of the proportions and shapes of your build right. Otherwise, good build!

  • How would you decrease acceleration without decreasing top speed? 3.6 years ago

    @rexrexThezion Now that you say that, i feel kinda stupid for not realizing that. Thanks though!

  • Grandeur Guide 3.6 years ago

    @AerialFighterSnakes you were warned

  • [CLOSED] Amphibian Challenge 3.6 years ago

    @FeiWu Noted. Thanks, finally got some motivation to give flying boats a try!

  • [CLOSED] Amphibian Challenge 3.6 years ago

    For the innovation category, will points be taken off if it's not an original design? (e.i. a replica of an already existing craft in the real world)

  • Quickkkk question 3.6 years ago

    It should fire 3.3rps, which can be found by dividing 200 by 60. The delay for the cannon should be a round every 0.303 seconds, which correlates with 3.3rps.

  • Grandeur OH-7 Caracal 3.6 years ago

    @WarHawk95 Well, I can kind of talk in french, I'm just not all that great at it. I'm still learning though!

  • Grandeur Derecho MkIV.D 3.7 years ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle Yeah, I’d have to agree with the aerodynamics, I think I oversized the air intake for the radiators

    +1
  • CTC Nexus Field Mouse 3.7 years ago

    Would it still be so effective at destroying Thomas if it had a bad relationship with its friends?

  • Grandeur Derecho MkIV.D 3.7 years ago

    @CreeperOfTheFortress Ive been caught! Really though, it actually started out as one, then I got a little sidetracked and it went way downhill from there

  • Grandeur Derecho MkIV.D 3.7 years ago

    @WolfSpark @Treadmill103 Thanks! First time writing a history of an aircraft, great to hear it turned out well!

    +2
  • Boeing B777-9X 4.2 years ago

    How dare you trick me with the coronavirus cure.

  • S50-3 Chimera 4.2 years ago

    @MrPorg137 Thanks!

  • S50-3 Chimera 4.2 years ago

    @Mustang51 Alright, I'll keep that in mind and see if any that fixes it- terribly sorry if this was somewhat a wastd of your time! I'll try to stop bothering you

    Happy landings!

  • S50-3 Chimera 4.2 years ago

    @ArcturusAerospace Thanks mon ami!

  • LC-2 LeClerc 4.2 years ago

    @Mustang51 https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/jB824G/S50-3-Chimera

    For some reason, the aircraft seems to roll to the right; especially noticeable when turning left. This problem only occurred after I added two rotators on the on horizontal stabilizers, but it doesn't make sense how that happened as the characteristics of both are identical. I know for sure it isn't any of the extraneous details outside of the center, as the ones that do not have a mirrored counterpart have their mass and drag values disabled. So it must be with the rotators, I have tried redoing it but the problem persists every time I add them (I sent a friend request on discord, so I can send any additional information quicker, if need be).

  • LC-2 LeClerc 4.2 years ago

    @Mustang51 Terribly sorry this is a bad time, or a bad place to say it, but would you be able to help with a problem I'm having with one of my builds?

  • S50-3 Chimäre 4.2 years ago

    @MasterKiryu Thanks mon ami!

  • LC-2 LeClerc 4.2 years ago

    @Mustang51 Thanks, and I hope you get a chance to fly a cub!