There are many things that attribute to people wanting to download/comment on a build. And only the former is the most popular as many people tend to not comment, but only download and leave.
Furthermore, custom thumbnails, and even just a better build quality is better
@tsampoy I don't really know, but when I went on a trip to Las Vegas, it appears to be something like an American-style restaurant (burgers, fries, fried chicken, barbeque, et cetera)
@SPMTB you're absolutely fine! I have nothing against you for the rules or anything, I guess I'm just salty at what I lost to, but it WAS a fair game. I just wish that it wasn't so overpowered
@11qazxc just fyi, I'm not arguing with you, I'm just trying to explain my point.
And yeah, but then you will have broken bones, and likely can't hold a stick. No human has felt more than 46 g forces. And even then, he had severe damage (that healed). He also is the person who invented, and forced companies to use, the seatbelt. And most electronics fail once a certain force is met, which is why F-22s have computerized systems to stop it from going over 9 Gs, or there will be inrepairable damage. And certainly not lol, but nonetheless, that's why I'm just saying that it was... erm... a little TOO open for interpretation. It's like asking a southerner what the 2nd amendment means, and then asking an Aussie what American gun rights are. Completely different results. People will do as they please. But nonetheless, it's just weird that there are really good, realistically functioning aircraft that lost to crafts that literally destroy a plane before they fall put of the sky.
@11qazxc sorry, but what human can withstand 200 g-forces?
Real aircraft can't even survive that. Yes, it's a dogfight challenge, but you really shouldn't make a flying penis in two seconds that has missiles that immediately decimate a plane in 0.01 seconds. I find it, ultimately, to make it not as fun. Yes, dogfights don't last more than a few seconds to a few minutes on average, but it is far better if it ends quick fair and square and realistic
I'm really glad @TMach5 managed to get to the first place spots. It shows that you don't need to heavily modify your plane, and you can still focus on the looks for functionality
@AntiAirNuri aww, thank you so much. I see flaws in the usefulness of my aircraft (making afterburner function on throttle rather than activation group) but it hurt to have lost to a heavily XML modded plane. I loved some of the other XKL modded planes, but some of them went overboard in my opinion
@Weebhater12
I'm sorry lad (or lass), but this is exactly why the community is falling apart. People like you decide to slander a small aspect of the community, and you have now gotten at least 20 people here cursing you out. Certainly, there are a lot of anime builds, and I may not like anime, but I'm not petty enough to go around going "screw you, screw you, screw you." Just calm down. I'm certain you can put something GOOD into the community versus this bullcrap.
And if this is your alt, I'd suggest leaving before the real storm comes.
@asteroidbook345 out of curiosity, could I have access to the FT codes sheet?
I'm going to try and put automatically extending autocannons that have autoaim. I have the code for the pistons and door of the autocannons, but I would like some help on the autoaim for the rotators. I completely get it if you can't or don't want to though
@K2K okay, thanks!
Cool!
There are many things that attribute to people wanting to download/comment on a build. And only the former is the most popular as many people tend to not comment, but only download and leave.
+11Furthermore, custom thumbnails, and even just a better build quality is better
I think this line of planes was really interesting. 'Tis a shame that jets took over, and also a great thing at the same time
+2Coolio!
+1@KnightOfRen lmao
@tsampoy I don't really know, but when I went on a trip to Las Vegas, it appears to be something like an American-style restaurant (burgers, fries, fried chicken, barbeque, et cetera)
+1@PapaKernels ohhhhh. Okay XD
@PapaKernels they said derp sixteen
lol, I got pinned
dErP SiXtEeN
Were you just banned?
@AntiAirNuri lol, thanks
+1@MrGreen ohhh gotcha. Thanks
+1Yeah, the Blitzableiter (one of my plane designs) is a BWB, then
Either way, neat challenge!
So... basically flying wings?
@PapaKernels uhh... uhhh smoke bomb
+1@Astro12 okay, thanks!
Can I do a replica?
It would be of a Peacemaker (B-36)
@SPMTB you're absolutely fine! I have nothing against you for the rules or anything, I guess I'm just salty at what I lost to, but it WAS a fair game. I just wish that it wasn't so overpowered
@11qazxc just fyi, I'm not arguing with you, I'm just trying to explain my point.
And yeah, but then you will have broken bones, and likely can't hold a stick. No human has felt more than 46 g forces. And even then, he had severe damage (that healed). He also is the person who invented, and forced companies to use, the seatbelt. And most electronics fail once a certain force is met, which is why F-22s have computerized systems to stop it from going over 9 Gs, or there will be inrepairable damage. And certainly not lol, but nonetheless, that's why I'm just saying that it was... erm... a little TOO open for interpretation. It's like asking a southerner what the 2nd amendment means, and then asking an Aussie what American gun rights are. Completely different results. People will do as they please. But nonetheless, it's just weird that there are really good, realistically functioning aircraft that lost to crafts that literally destroy a plane before they fall put of the sky.
@asg and yeah, lol. Agreed
+1@PapaKernels agreed
@11qazxc sorry, but what human can withstand 200 g-forces?
+1Real aircraft can't even survive that. Yes, it's a dogfight challenge, but you really shouldn't make a flying penis in two seconds that has missiles that immediately decimate a plane in 0.01 seconds. I find it, ultimately, to make it not as fun. Yes, dogfights don't last more than a few seconds to a few minutes on average, but it is far better if it ends quick fair and square and realistic
I'm really glad @TMach5 managed to get to the first place spots. It shows that you don't need to heavily modify your plane, and you can still focus on the looks for functionality
+2@AntiAirNuri aww, thank you so much. I see flaws in the usefulness of my aircraft (making afterburner function on throttle rather than activation group) but it hurt to have lost to a heavily XML modded plane. I loved some of the other XKL modded planes, but some of them went overboard in my opinion
Imagine sitting in traffic, and it just suddenly turns dark. And this thing just flies over you... holy crap XD
Amazing replica
@realSavageMan lol
+1@SPMTB also, you should probably change the
[OPEN]
To "in progress" or "Closed"
@SPMTB woot woot! I look forward to this. Good luck, everybody!
And resizing your blocks
@F1849 You should start using blueprints
This is really cool! Reminds me of a YF-23
+2Amazing!
@ChrisPy hmm. Interesting. Thank you for your feedback
@032 cool, that's what I was thinking too
@asteroidbook345 yeah, and they're amazing! I honestly just want to take up the challenge of making my own
@Weebhater12
I'm sorry lad (or lass), but this is exactly why the community is falling apart. People like you decide to slander a small aspect of the community, and you have now gotten at least 20 people here cursing you out. Certainly, there are a lot of anime builds, and I may not like anime, but I'm not petty enough to go around going "screw you, screw you, screw you." Just calm down. I'm certain you can put something GOOD into the community versus this bullcrap.
And if this is your alt, I'd suggest leaving before the real storm comes.
@MrGreen lol, thanks. It was originally going to be a twin-boom, but I already had made the wings and I was lazy (and time was running out)
+1@Nerfaddict I think they deleted them all?
Noice
Thanks! @CatHoldingTheSun
Vomit
@PapaKernels lmao
lmao
+3Thanks! @Stinky
@ChrisPy spelling facts fax
My Post
~Tags:~
@PapaKernels
@ACEPILOT109
@Stinky
Posting in ~30 minutes >:)
@asteroidbook345 out of curiosity, could I have access to the FT codes sheet?
I'm going to try and put automatically extending autocannons that have autoaim. I have the code for the pistons and door of the autocannons, but I would like some help on the autoaim for the rotators. I completely get it if you can't or don't want to though
@realSavageMan okay, thanks!