@Tomcatbetterthanhornet that's awesome! But please make it at least 150 parts
.
Also, what weapons will it have? During this era there were no missiles, so it would be a brick in the sky without even rockets
~USN COMMANDING OFFICER REPORT~
.
Alright, matey, this aircraft performs pretty well! Take off is smooth, the jet engine and prop engine are really nice (HOW DID YOU DO THAT WITH THE PROP?)
The weapons are pretty good, nice damage, and I think it could fare well in a Dogfight. The internal bombs bay makes for a really unique design, and it seems nice. The only downside is that, at least in real life, there is so much empty space on the inside, this aircraft would likely crunch on landing on an aircraft carrier. But those landings are pretty nice in the game. A good all-around mixed-propulsion naval fighter. I will put this in the tournament! Good luck, m8
Okay, I'm bored, so I'm going to do this.
What exactly do you want done?
I can build a complete remake of this that functions the same, and has tons of new features if you want
@Theonewithaircraft a cannon that automatically loads and shoots
Guns with more than 20mm are considered Autocannons, and almost all fighter planes have them
Anocracy
An "elected" individual put under their own power, but with minor rights to vote
.
Dictatorship
Supreme leader controlling the citizens
.
Socialism
Worker's country. People are placed in permanent working units as a family line, usually under pressured rule with little rights
.
Communism
Much like socialism, however, holds a lot of Dictorial values, and money is distributed based on social class
.
Capitalism is not a government...
And the USA is a Federal government
.
Federal
A large state separated into smaller states, usually with their own power, but limited under a larger unified government
.
Confederacy
Much like Federal government, but the smaller substates have more power
.
Democracy (more of a custom than a government)
The right to vote (also, much like Socialism, but you vote instead of working to death)
.
Republic
One large leader over States, or a separated union
.
Unitary state
Usually consisting of a Parliament and a large leader over a single, unified state. Usually smaller countries
@AWESOMENESS360 ACTUALLY you noob...
.
The F-22 was superior! Just because the dumb YF-23 was faster, had the same maneuverability, better Stealth figure, more unique, longer range, larger and overall having more weapons. Ugh, so pitiful
.
This is a joke btw. I agree with you
I love the F-22 a lot and want to fly it in the Air Force, but the YF-23 had better specs. The only reason it lost was because Northrop decided not to fly at the show-off for it. And therefore didn't catch any attention. And the thrust-vectoring was seen as better anyways. Either way, I think both could have fared well
@edensk I'm not referring to G-LOC (G-Force Induced Loss of Conciousness). I'm referring to the phenomena during WW2 where dive bombers would crash because of control surfaces locking up at high speeds, which is why until 1947 it was thought that surpassing the speed of sound was impossible
@WarHawk95 oh, thanks!
Before the "Fighter" Designation was used, P for Pursuit was used until the first purely jet aircraft were created. I just did some research and yes, you are correct, it should be XF, not XP. My bad
@MrGreen okay, thanks!
And of course! I'm going to build the tank, but I'm on mobile, so no real tracks, sorry. Is it okay if I use a jet engine just for sound effects?
Okay, I don't have a great knowledge on tanks, so please educate me.
.
I have designed a tank based on the Mark V from World War One, but with the addition of a top turret, a Turbo-Hybrid Turbine Engine, and 3 20mm autoloading autocannons.
Technically, it is called a landship, but in modern terms, would it just be a heavy tank?
The THI is mainly meant for Air/slightly sea superiority, but maintains a ground force. So only one tank design is there to take up all the roles
@PapaWii I thought that was what you were doing XD
+1Thank you so much!
@PapaWii lol thx
+1Thanks! @Rodrigo110
.
Are you thinking of joining?
@Tomcatbetterthanhornet that's awesome! But please make it at least 150 parts
.
Also, what weapons will it have? During this era there were no missiles, so it would be a brick in the sky without even rockets
Airbus
Sorry, that was delayed lol
~USN COMMANDING OFFICER REPORT~
.
Alright, matey, this aircraft performs pretty well! Take off is smooth, the jet engine and prop engine are really nice (HOW DID YOU DO THAT WITH THE PROP?)
The weapons are pretty good, nice damage, and I think it could fare well in a Dogfight. The internal bombs bay makes for a really unique design, and it seems nice. The only downside is that, at least in real life, there is so much empty space on the inside, this aircraft would likely crunch on landing on an aircraft carrier. But those landings are pretty nice in the game. A good all-around mixed-propulsion naval fighter. I will put this in the tournament! Good luck, m8
@Tomcatbetterthanhornet I mean, sure, but the issue comes down to how will it fight then?
.
And I will say yes, but only if it is at least 150 parts
Awesome! I will test it in a minute. The first entry!
+1Okay, I'm bored, so I'm going to do this.
+1What exactly do you want done?
I can build a complete remake of this that functions the same, and has tons of new features if you want
@MrGreen what is the max number of cannons/guns?
I think mine will have 3 cannons, and 4-5 20mm anti-personell autocannons
XB-51
Tea
@PapaWii YES agreed
It's been over a week
+2@11qazxc @Rodrigo110 agreed. This will keep it moving smoothly, and without much change
+2Sexy
+2Cool!
@SkyBoogie1the1oringle that's why your post got removed
@SkyBoogie1the1oringle it's copyrighted
T!
+1lols, jk. It's for the challenge
Flies like a beast, and I love it
Afterburner is beautiful too
Awesome!
@Theonewithaircraft and you're fine lol
@Theonewithaircraft a cannon that automatically loads and shoots
Guns with more than 20mm are considered Autocannons, and almost all fighter planes have them
Thanks! @MiiWini
It's up to you, so long as you meet the other requirements!
@chibikitsune nope. It can be a mixed prop, a pure propeller, or a very slow pure jet
Sorry, I took AP Human Geography this year and had to learn about all the countries XD
Also, an Autocracy is a Dictatorship/Communism
Anocracy
An "elected" individual put under their own power, but with minor rights to vote
.
Dictatorship
Supreme leader controlling the citizens
.
Socialism
Worker's country. People are placed in permanent working units as a family line, usually under pressured rule with little rights
.
Communism
Much like socialism, however, holds a lot of Dictorial values, and money is distributed based on social class
.
Capitalism is not a government...
And the USA is a Federal government
.
Federal
A large state separated into smaller states, usually with their own power, but limited under a larger unified government
.
Confederacy
Much like Federal government, but the smaller substates have more power
.
Democracy (more of a custom than a government)
The right to vote (also, much like Socialism, but you vote instead of working to death)
.
Republic
One large leader over States, or a separated union
.
Unitary state
Usually consisting of a Parliament and a large leader over a single, unified state. Usually smaller countries
Thanks! @WisconsinStatePolice
+1Thanks! @rexzion
@AWESOMENESS360 lol
@WarHawk95 will do
Also, Tea on el
Russian Raptornt@AWESOMENESS360 ACTUALLY you noob...
.
The F-22 was superior! Just because the dumb YF-23 was faster, had the same maneuverability, better Stealth figure, more unique, longer range, larger and overall having more weapons. Ugh, so pitiful
.
This is a joke btw. I agree with you
I love the F-22 a lot and want to fly it in the Air Force, but the YF-23 had better specs. The only reason it lost was because Northrop decided not to fly at the show-off for it. And therefore didn't catch any attention. And the thrust-vectoring was seen as better anyways. Either way, I think both could have fared well
@WarHawk95 and thank you so much!
@edensk it's related to pressure though, yeah?
IAS is based on the pressure in the Pitot tube
@WarHawk95 and thank you too. That was my bad
@edensk OHHH. Okay, thank you!
@MrGreen okay, thanks
@rexzion would you like to join?
@rexzion indeed
@edensk I forgot what it was called, though. Sorry
@edensk I'm not referring to G-LOC (G-Force Induced Loss of Conciousness). I'm referring to the phenomena during WW2 where dive bombers would crash because of control surfaces locking up at high speeds, which is why until 1947 it was thought that surpassing the speed of sound was impossible
@WarHawk95 oh, thanks!
Before the "Fighter" Designation was used, P for Pursuit was used until the first purely jet aircraft were created. I just did some research and yes, you are correct, it should be XF, not XP. My bad
@MrGreen okay, thanks!
And of course! I'm going to build the tank, but I'm on mobile, so no real tracks, sorry. Is it okay if I use a jet engine just for sound effects?
Also, you might want to pin the scoreboard
Okay, I don't have a great knowledge on tanks, so please educate me.
.
I have designed a tank based on the Mark V from World War One, but with the addition of a top turret, a Turbo-Hybrid Turbine Engine, and 3 20mm autoloading autocannons.
Technically, it is called a landship, but in modern terms, would it just be a heavy tank?
The THI is mainly meant for Air/slightly sea superiority, but maintains a ground force. So only one tank design is there to take up all the roles